Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So what else does Victoria Toensing decide?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:11 AM
Original message
So what else does Victoria Toensing decide?
She apparently believes that she is the sole arbiter of who is a covert agent. Director of the CIA? What could he possibly know that Victoria Toensing doesn't? Pull out Valerie Plame's file, and it may say covert, but could she possibly be covert without Toensing knowing about it? After all, she wrote the law and therefore must be the final judge of every case where the law could be applied.

But why stop there? Victoria Toensing must be in charge of deciding other things too, like whether it is going to rain today or what will be on sale at the grocery store. What else does she get to decide?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. She decides how her hubby's not gonna get it tonight...
That's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. There was an article----
about when the regulations for this bill were written. The person who helped the congress and Lloyd Bentson write the bill said Toensing was only a typist who help get the bill ready. SHE DID NOT HAVE ANYthing to do with any of the regulations that were written. Now that's from someone who really did have the bill written.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. But that's not what she says!
Edited on Mon Jun-04-07 08:58 PM by EstimatedProphet
According to her, she's the foremost arbiter on covert agentness in the world, because she wrote the legal language defining it. Since she wrote the bill, she's automatically in touch with every agent in the CIA, and gets to decide their status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. She once tried to keep her husband from making an a** of himself
Edited on Mon Jun-04-07 08:42 AM by kskiska


(snip)

Perhaps no recent incident has drawn as much interest and speculation as diGenova's role as an anonymous source for the Dallas Morning News. The melodrama began when Toensing was approached by an intermediary for a Secret Service agent who was said to be willing to testify that he saw Clinton and Lewinsky in a compromising situation. DiGenova passed this on to Morning News reporter David Jackson ("Joe and I exchanged a few words over that," Toensing says), and the paper published the story in its Internet edition, attributing the account to an unnamed lawyer "familiar with the negotiations." But by then the intermediary had told Toensing the agent was backing off.

Hours later, the Morning News retracted the report, saying the "longtime Washington lawyer" had said the information was "inaccurate."

The couple now say that Toensing, taking a call from Jackson hours before deadline, told the reporter: "If Joe is your source, it's wrong."

"The bottom line is, they were told not to print and they chose to print," diGenova says. "I don't know how much more helpful you can be to a newspaper than to tell them not to print."

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/couple022798.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's a shame he doesn't return the favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC