If the GOP really feels that progress is being made in Iraq, why not hold a debate there?

[BushOut06]

And not in some heavily fortified bunker either. If progress is being made, and areas really are that much safer, just hold the debate in a regular Iraqi building, with minimal security. After all, they shouldn't have much to worry about, should they?

[ingac70]

1. Yeah! Smack dab in Sadr City.

With minimal security to prove just how fiscally conservative they are.

[MadMaddie]

2. Actually that's not a bad idea...

All of the Repubik nominees will not be given flak jackets, helmets or hundreds of guards....they think that the Iraqi people are doing great then they can drink the water and eat the food the Iraqi's are eating...but they will only be afforded 3 hours of electricity to have their debate....

[Hekate]

3. Outside the Green Zone, with no air cover. Good idea.

:evilgrin:

Hekate

[StClone]

4. They don't want to abort their Campaign

With a premature death no matter how glorious the backdrop would be.

[blondeatlast]

5. Excellent idea and let the grunts ask the questions. nt

[blondeatlast]

6. Good time for George to pay a visit to the troops he supports so well, too.

It did Bert the Turtle a world of good.

[Bjorn Against]

7. They can invite all the "grateful Iraqis" that they keep telling us about to come watch it

[BrotherBuzz]

8. Brown suits would be the attire for the day

:rofl:

[B Calm]

9. I'm sure the Iraqi people would welcome them with open arms

and throw flowers at them for liberating them. They will be treated as royalty!

[shadowknows69]

10. Best. Idea. Ever. n/t