Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Lieberman favors military strike on Iran" and other crazy talk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 11:22 AM
Original message
"Lieberman favors military strike on Iran" and other crazy talk

Lieberman favors military strike on Iran

9 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Sen. Joseph Lieberman (news, bio, voting record) said Sunday the United States should consider a military strike against Iran because of Tehran's involvement in Iraq.

"I think we've got to be prepared to take aggressive military action against the Iranians to stop them from killing Americans in Iraq," Lieberman said. "And to me, that would include a strike over the border into Iran, where we have good evidence that they have a base at which they are training these people coming back into Iraq to kill our soldiers."

The U.S. accuses Iran of fostering terrorism and Tehran's nuclear ambitions have brought about international reproach.

Lieberman, the Democratic nominee for vice president in 2000 who now represents Connecticut as an independent, spoke of Iranians' role in the continued violence in Iraq.

link


U.S. general paints candid picture of Iraq army, police

By Ross Colvin 40 minutes ago

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraqi security forces should be in a position to take control of 14 of Iraq's 18 provinces by year's end, although they will not be ready to fight on their own for some time, a top U.S. general said on Sunday.

Giving a candid assessment of their capabilities, Lieutenant-General Martin Dempsey, in charge of U.S.-led efforts to reconstruct Iraq's security forces over the past 22 months, also said there was a critical shortage of good senior officers.

Creating a new police force and army, disbanded after the U.S.-led invasion to oust Saddam Hussein in 2003, is a prerequisite for a U.S. withdrawal. U.S. soldiers though have voiced frustration at what they see as slow progress.

Dempsey's efforts to rebuild Iraq's security forces, which now comprise 154,000 soldiers and 194,000 policemen, have been dogged by accusations that the forces, especially the police, are beset by sectarianism, corruption and poor discipline.

link


They'll be ready to take over by the end of the year, but not stand on their own for some time?

Nine weeks of basic training prepares a U.S. high school student for combat. If the Iraqis are already trained and battle tested, why the hell can't they stand on their own? Withdraw the troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. There ya go
Edited on Sun Jun-10-07 11:25 AM by seemslikeadream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Has any concrete evidence of Iranian involvment been brought
before the UN security council?

By hard evidence I mean "Hard Evidence" and not Colin Powell with a fake WMD prop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thank You, Connecticut!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why did the people of Ct. vote for this pos? eom
Edited on Sun Jun-10-07 11:43 AM by bluerum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The Republicans of CT did, with a very small percentage of the
Dems.

A lot of the latter I've spoken to since have extreme buyer's regret.

The rest of us were disgusted, and continue to be disgusted, with the jr. Senator from CT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Put Lieberdweeb on the front line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. memo: Dear Mr. Lieberman: STFU! Sincerely, Edweird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. He's got kids, right?
Ship 'em over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. 70% of suicide bombers in Iraq are Saudis
The funding for the Sunni insurgency comes from Saudi Arabia.
Where is Lieberman's comment on that?

"Martyrs' In Iraq Mostly Saudis"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/14/AR2005051401270.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Which government is Joe working for again? (and every other warmonger?)
A war with Iran would bury us right now. But maybe, certain representatives are representing interests other than those of the American people and their nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Be careful
Even thinking such thoughts here can get one labeled.

But I question his loyalties, and to whom his true allegiance is owed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I am referring to the whole cabal that got us into this self-destructive war
They are clearly not working for American interests. I just wonder whose interests the ARE working for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. So Joe wants what PNAC wants.
What a surprise! NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good job fuckwipe jackass warmongering Connecticut electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC