Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rather Blasts Couric For Dumbing Down, Tarting Up Evening News

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ariesgem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 07:14 PM
Original message
Rather Blasts Couric For Dumbing Down, Tarting Up Evening News
As already noted on NewsBusters, former CBS anchor Dan Rather appeared on Monday’s edition of "Morning Joe" and lobbied for a "a strategic withdrawal from Iraq." He also found time to twice bash his "Evening News" successor Katie Couric for dumbing down and "tarting up" the news. After giving the standard caveat that Couric is a "nice person," he went in for kill. Speculating on the program’s declining ratings, Rather complained to MSNBC host Joe Scarborough that "the mistake was to try to bring the ‘Today’ ethos to the evening news and to dumb it down, tart it up in hopes of attracting a younger audience."

Rather vociferously derided the media’s obsession with celebrities, in particular the hyperbolic coverage of the Paris Hilton affair. (This is a fair point, but it’s a little odd to be making it on MSNBC, one of the worst offenders in Hilton overkill.) For a second time in the 7:30am hour, he attacked the "superficial changes" made in his absence:

Dan Rather: "You know, she tried to change networks, which is always difficult and change the programs at the same time. They've done all of the usual things. They changed the set. They changed the executive producers. They changed the graphics person, lately, forced out a guy who had been there, Ned Steinberg, for many, many years. They make all those kind of the superficial changes. I do want to say that, I think, under Rick Kaplan, that they have tried to harden up the broadcast in recent days, but that is a relative phrase, harden it up. That , you know, the trend line continues, as I say, dumbing it down, tarting it up, going to celebrity coverage rather than war coverage."

http://newsbusters.org/stories/dan_rather_bashes_katie_couric.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. It was hard to imagine the news coverage getting worse than Rather's
but yes, it does get even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Rather was better than anyone on currently. And IMO was
the best then, except for Jennings. He speaks truth to power. That is what the purpose of the press is, and why a free press has to be defended and guarded. The press should keep the electorate informed, not pander to the powers that be. Rather fulfilled that role like no one else currently except for K.O., Helen T. , Moyers, the late Jennings, and few others. The internet is now serving the role of the press because the M$M has become prestitutes for the corporate and Israeli POV. They no longer represent the view of average Americans. I applaud all of those courageous enough to speak truth to power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kokonoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dan Rather pushed the edges and kept his job.
Up untill...... he pushed too far. God bless Dan Rather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Ditto! God bless Dan Rather. ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. She doesn't have the control over image and content that he had. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. She's an absolute bore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. If CBS Had Any Nads (They Don't), They'd Hire, No BEG, Dan To Come Back, However
Edited on Mon Jun-11-07 07:30 PM by Dinger
I have a feeling Dan likes it just fine right where he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Do you know that I started watching Rather solely after he
got into trouble? I had previously been watching my favorite at that time, Peter Jennings, only intermittently watching Rather. I never stopped watching him in total support of what he stoood for and was smeared for.

Do you also know that I have not once tuned in to Katie Couric, and I never will? The only time that I have viewed her was because of the interview with the Edwards ... I had to. And she did not disappoint me in my disappointment. I will never watch CBS news again, as long as Couric is on.

I wonder how many are out there like me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
6.  but some people's lives depend on....tarting up the news!
junyer bush's, for one. rush limbah-humbug is another. tim russert would be executed if ever the NEWS got loose to where significant numbers of citizens were exposed to it- the same fate would befall the entire mob at fox 'news' and the gucci'ed criminals at cnn....john gibson is a DEAD MAN if 'the news' ever escapes its handlers/tamers/doctors/spinners....same with tom friedman, grover norquist, tony snow, bobs woodward novak your uncle...hell Dan knows full well that the news is TOXIC and the tender shoots of lying mediawhores aren't built to withstand the burning, the eating away and the bitter pain, he KNOWS THAT! Mr Rather is being nice, like Katie, like always. He's a nice man, who wants nice people to act nice, and all this mass murder and lying and criminal activity in high places corrupting our newsmedia and poisoning the future AINT NICE, and Dan Rather wishes someone would stop acting so darn unprofessionally, at least for awhile...
go Dan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Uh YUP! Dumberer and dumberer. Just the way we like it!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado thinker Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. I have NO respect for her.
She could have played the job as a serious journalist but she chose to be fluffy while pretending to be a serious journalist. Women like her make it more difficult for the rest of us to be taken seriously, I'm afraid.

Christianne Amanpour, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cami715 Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I agree completely.
She is no journalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado thinker Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Can you imagine her
standing on a street in Baghdad, with flat hair, no makeup, and a flak jacket?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Tarting up" ???
What did she do that was "tartish" ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. well, for starters...








(Charles Tart professor of psychology UC Davis)

All of which would make better news anchors than Katie Couric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The word "tart" suggests she was doing something sexual
was she doing something sexual during the newscasts? I think she's an awful anchor and therefore never watched her. But I hadn't heard about her behaving in a sexual manner before this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I like my "tarts" with cherries or strawberries and cream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Are you asking if she did something sexual during the evening news
Edited on Mon Jun-11-07 08:59 PM by SaveAmerica
newscasts? I don't think he's saying she's done something sexual during the evening newscast, his quote seems to be talking about the execs who made the decision to hire her; "Rather complained to MSNBC host Joe Scarborough that "the mistake was to try to bring the ‘Today’ ethos to the evening news and to dumb it down, tart it up in hopes of attracting a younger audience." They made the decision based on how she was on the Today show and her popularity (?) there. In the today show bits I saw in the past and some of her evening interviews she was very flirty and sexual when she interviewed men (unless they opposed Bush's policies - ie Kerry, she was very frosty during that interview). I don't think he's saying she's a tart, but they are trying to tart up the show with her sexuality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. "Tarting up"! ROTFLMAO! What a great phrase for him to use. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. It is a real Ratherism! I so miss his soft southern condemnation! ..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Tart means "prostitute" or "promiscuous woman". If he'd said she made the news slutty or whorish
would you think that was OK too? Why is it considered OK to call women these kinds of things? He chose that word not because of her great lack as a newscaster, but because she's a woman, and that's just plain wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I haven't watched her but to me the statement meant she was flirting her way
through the news. If she is indeed doing that then perhaps that was called for. Otherwise, it wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. There are plenty of real women journalists
CBS could have recruited. Linda Ellerbee, Susan Stamberg, Judy Woodruff, Martha Teichner, ... I"m sure I'm leaving out a bunch. But those came immediately to mind.

Katy was only ever mildly amusing as a morning show host, she's not a real journalist. And CBS is now paying for their perfidy in selecting a fluffball over a woman of substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. Well - he should have - FOLLOWED UP - on the Shrub AWOL story nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC