Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FDA called 'cozy' with drugmakers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:20 AM
Original message
FDA called 'cozy' with drugmakers
http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2007-06-11-fda-drugmakers_N.htm?csp=34

FDA called 'cozy' with drugmakers
By Rita Rubin, USA TODAY

While revising their drug-review policy last year, Food and Drug Administration officials met 112 times with industry representatives but only five times with consumer and patient groups, according to data out Monday from the House Appropriations Committee.

The FDA provided the data in response to questions submitted in March by Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y.

The meetings occurred between October 2005 and December 2006 and focused on the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, under which manufacturers help pay for the review of their new drugs.

The House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health today is to discuss reauthorization of the measure; the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, of which Hinchey is a member, is to debate the FDA's 2008 budget.

"The FDA has essentially become the government affairs office of the pharmaceutical industry," Hinchey said in a statement, which called the relationship between the agency and industry "far too cozy and inappropriate." Hinchey is the author, and Bart Stupak, D-Mich., the chief co-sponsor of an FDA reform bill that would prohibit the agency from collecting fees from the companies it regulates. Instead, the money would be deposited into the general fund of the U.S. Treasury.

According to the Appropriations Committee, two officials of the Biotechnology Industry Organization and two officials of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association attended at least half of the 112 meetings.

In a statement, the FDA's Susan Cruzan said the agency faced a number of technical problems to be resolved before submitting the proposal. The FDA had "extensive discussions" with the industry about financing, marketing and infrastructure. She added that the agency also met with consumer groups and that each meeting followed the law's requirements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. They call them their 'clients.' WE are their clients. Grrrr! Stupid FDA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, criminee.
Ya think???????????

And in other news, the sun came up today. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hahaha. You beat me to it!
But I was going to say "Water is wet."

I do hope nobody was blindsided by this news. I sure don't want to hear another disingenuous chorus of "If we only knew then what we know now."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. You could add some Democratic senators on the "cozy" list...
Such as Kerry and Kennedy, who made it their business to vote for the 'poison pill' amendment that gutted the Dorgan amendment recently. The pharmaceutical lobbyist groups were happy about that! We do have our whores! Plus all the media who never reported who did the damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Isn't cozy that new drug that inhibits your morals.
Some of the side effects include a unquestioned admiration for President Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC