|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:02 AM Original message |
TOOBIN: WH Will NOT Allow Former Admin Officials To Testify-EVEN IF They Want to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
1. Then let them cite it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 12:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Executive Privilege Cannot Be Used In Criminal Matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Right. It's basically need to know, and investigating crime = need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 02:28 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. King Dick Head would be obstructing justice at that point, hiding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
2. Boo hoo. Send the papers and arrest those who don't come to tesitfy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:14 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. 100% correct n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
3. I'm incredibly confused. According to Bartlett and Tony Snow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catmandu57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:17 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. If you talk to yourself while taking a dump in a whitehouse john |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanglefoot (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 11:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
16. nice catch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VP505 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
4. Sounds as if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
5. I do not recall who said it but I find it quite telling of anyone associated with bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:37 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Wasn't everything said to Clinton made public? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. yes, indeedie do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-14-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. Is it possible to get glasses or mental short-sightedness? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-14-07 01:39 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. i think so, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 01:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
22. I Know You Didn't Mean Me, But. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 01:14 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Maybe it was You Prof !!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
6. Get these self-serving thugs OUT OF THE WH! They have never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
7. So Meiers & Taylor will fight the subpoenas, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
8. In U.S. vs. Nixon: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 01:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. Bush goons on SCOTUS Alito and Roberts supported the martial law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 01:22 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Maybe SCOTUS won't support it if THEY don't want to get impeached later! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
10. I'd ask how is that legal but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
11. Under normal circumstance that would be obstruction of justice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
14. Claiming executive privilege for aides and staff members didn't work with Clinton, so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
15. There is no such thing as "executive privilege". It is a made up term. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
17. The wh may not have the final say so: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
19. "The illegal stuff we do here is none of your business, public." n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morgana LaFey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Exactly. Could it BE any more transparent and obvious? Hardly. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-13-07 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
28. And Toobin will probably explain that EVEN IF the President was not party to the conversations in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Oct 18th 2024, 04:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC