Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry On Hardball: "Iraq is worse than Vietnam"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:23 PM
Original message
Kerry On Hardball: "Iraq is worse than Vietnam"
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 06:23 PM by Hissyspit
Gave various reasons including that "Iraq was a war of choice."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Iraq was a war of choice." -- So was Vietnam. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ron Christie.... ugh.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Ugh is right. He makes Buchanan sound
almost lucid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Buchanan usually is lucid, but a lucid bigot
can be quite revolting.

The other guy Christie, is just a Rove bot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. but nam was fightin the commies!
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 06:26 PM by Jim4Wes
probably Kerry needs to rethink that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Full quote
Quote;
'Iraq is worse than Vietnam, and the reason it's worse is because came about as a war of choice, not the extension of a major ideological effort like the cold war, and I think that the deception and inadequacies of leadership have been far greater in the long run.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Its a problematic statement
that he will have to explain over and over again. Doesn't ring true to the average bloke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. How would you communicate to the "average bloke"?
Since you are a politician and have done more for the "average bloke"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Assuming I know what he meant
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 07:12 PM by Jim4Wes
I would have said..."Iraq was a bigger mistake than Vietnam".

Enough of this...can't we all get along now?

O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Well, it's better than saying nothing.
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 07:16 PM by politicasista
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. same here.
:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. He made perfect sense!
There is a history of past and current statements about Iraq and Vietnam here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. disagree. How many died in Nam, all told
it dwarfs the numbers in Iraq. The statement requires multiple qualifiers and too much explaining to "make sense".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. The rate of casualty in Iraq has surpassed Vietnam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. So thats another qualifier then.
Read my posts or leave me alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Well, it proves his point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. It does
But some people have blinders on and can't accept reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. So did Tweety ask him
why he voted for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. thankfully, spittle-guy is on break
who is this man subbing for him? I kinda like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Why don't you give it a rest?
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 07:12 PM by politicasista
I was hoping the guest would ask the question why "progressives" keep letting Bush and Rove get away with the "voting for the war" lie instead of reading the statements about the vote and people that have been against it from the start.

Bush he was going to invade Iraq without a vote period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. For someone who was there
That is a strange statement.

Horrible as over 3,500 casualties are (and untold thousands of civilian deaths), the U.S. lost 58,000 troops in Vietnam. Vietnam had more longevity (so far), and a draft to keep troop numbers sustainable.

Both were/are wars of ideology, the Cold War bolstering the former, and neoconservatism pushing the latter. Both undergirded by capitalism and its rapaciousness. The entire century-plus since the Spanish-American War has followed a similar pattern - American exceptionalism, greed, jingoism, and racism, all a very potent brew for endless wars and mindless bloodshed, lining pockets from United Fruit to Halliburton along the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. His main point was that we started this one for no good reason. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I would say that about both
The one thing which is worse about Iraq is its long-term ripple effect. The 'blowback' will last decades, even centuries. To many in the middle east, this is yet another incarnation of the Crusades. Then there is the oil angle. The endless cycles of vengeance, and so on.

From a sociopolitical and economic standpoint, Iraq is proving it could be worse in the long run.

I would slightly amend what I said in my earlier post and say they are both very tragic and wasteful in very different ways, but for underlying reasons which are remarkably similar and not without precedent in American history. I could even go back as far as the Mexican War to make a few more points, but I think since we're mainly in agreement about Iraq, they're not needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Why is it strange for someone who was there to say that?
Hagel has said Iraq is like Vietnam, and he was there.

There is a history of past and current statements about Iraq and Vietnam here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. I think it is the longterm EFFECT it will have on the world is worse. Way worse.
Vietnam didn't spawn a whole movement against the US by the rest of the world.

Bush's policies reIraq under the guise of a War on Terror will be blowing back at this country for generations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bravo Zulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
26. I tend to agree with John Kerry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC