Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vitamin D Council's report on Autism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 07:08 AM
Original message
Vitamin D Council's report on Autism
http://www.vitamindcouncil.com/health/autism/

They even discusses how vaccines might play a part in compounding the problem.

After doing MY OWN RESEARCH, I have found that studies on the sun's effect on the skin suggest that for a fair skinned person, it takes at least 20 minutes of direct sun between 10 am and 2 pm before the UV B (the burn part of the sun) begins to cause damage to the cells. (for the darkest skins it may take up to 120 minutes to make enough) In that amount of time, you are getting a good dose of non-toxic, non-overdoseable D. The BEST kind of D.

Getting sun before 10 am and after 2, doesn't provide the D and can increase the susceptability to burn.

In the last discussion on D, I had to pull up sources for all of the above. Not today. I'm busy all day. I suggest you do your own research or look up the thread on Cancer and Vit. D from last week.

Get some sun today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. interesting... Recomended
Edited on Sat Jun-16-07 07:31 AM by sam sarrha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosillies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have never heard of this. This is incredibly interesting.
Thanks for providing the link.

I have two little boys, and autism has always been scary to me. We all either play outside or go to the beach almost every day. I think I've always intuitively felt that there was something wrong with hiding inside, covering up from head to toe or slathering on zinc oxide. We play in the sun safely, but we revel in the health benefits we gain from being active in the outdoors. Nice to know that there may be something to it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Be careful
Many doctors don't agree with this stance at all. Oh and ANY UV/sun exposure is damaging to the DNA, but its commonly repairable. Thats why people who have spent a lot of time outside have wrinkles--sun damage from exposure. Vitamin D is important, I agree and limited sun exposure does have its benefits for SOME but not all (patients with SLE-Lupus CANNOT have ANY sun exposure or they get very sick). You have it backwards on the sun exposure times..its best to go out BEFORE 10am and AFTER 2pm, thats when its LESS likely that you will get burned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I would add to that
that there is no epidemic of vitamin D deficiency in children under school age, the age when autism is generally first diagnosed. All the milk in this country, unless you own the cow, is fortified with Vitamin D. Vitamin D deficiency was problematic in children in northern climates in the winter before vitamin D was added to milk, but it produced rickets, not autism.

I would also caution people to please consider that these websites often have agendas of their own. For instance, did it occur to anyone that the Vitamin Council might be interested in <gasp!> selling vitamins?

Turtlensue is correct about the sun exposure times. Fair skinned people should avoid exposure between 10 AM and 2 PM, not court it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Milk is fortified with 100 IU of vitamin D per 8oz, and the current RDA
for people under 50 is 200 IU per day BUT there is a lot of research indicating that the optimum levels may be well above 1000 IU per day. I was stunned when I did a little googleing to see good research by people studying diabetes, depression, immune diseases etc. all confirming that Vitamin D has many subtle effects that weren't observed until recently. These weren't vitamin manufacturers boosting their product by outfits like NIH. GIven the chemical loads we all carry these days from pesticides, herbicides and manufacturing, who knows how much of any vitamin we need these days to repair and prevent damage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Funny about those "optimum levels," they were
developed by outfits with an interest in pushing supplements, including vitamin D. The researchers in Russia (cancer) and Minnesota (pain transmission) didn't go so far as to recommend new guidelines, not in the articles I have read.

Oil based vitamins accumulate in the body and can become toxic at very high levels. Another toxic substance in the body will not detoxify the ones already there.

If the RDA levels are increased for adults, and they have been increased for older adults, appropriate action needs to be taken.

Until then, the deficiency diseases are osteomalacia and rickets. Any other research into it is still too preliminary to act upon, IMO, because the links have been studied in people who were deficient in Vitamin D.

A discussion of development of the numbers plus some food sources is at http://dietary-supplements.info.nih.gov/factsheets/vitamind.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Take a look
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. See response above. Before 10 and after 2 does not provide D. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. You're right about sun exposure times..
As the song says, "Mad dogs and Englishmen go out in the midday sun"; but it's not the safest time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. That's what I thought too. re: 10 and 2
But according the study I found, researchers found that against all commonly held belief, the sun before 10 and after 2 does not penetrate to the cells that help manufacture D in the skin. That's why it's important to limit exposure. Because at those hours, you can burn.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diddlysquat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ohio Scientific makes a "personal UV monitor"
I saw them in Target for $20.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dr. Reinhold Vieth on vitamin D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dropkickpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah, sure
I am very fair skinned and if I go out in the sun between 10-2 for even 15 minutes I get BURNED. Everybody at work thinks that's a hoot. I'm sure you do too. I'd rather NOT get skin cancer, thankyouverymuch!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. This is kind of damned-if-you-do or don't as exposure to sun between 10 and 2
is the worst time of the day for skin cancer risk though it may be good for vitamin D. I think I'd take my vitamin D from other sources rather than risk skin cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. vitamin D needs a council? and advocates?
isn't that a little... odd?

i wonder if i can get a grant to start a council extolling the virtues of water to living things... }(
"moisture is the essence of wetness, and wetness means life..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. *hee hee*: My initial reaction too. WTF? Vitamin D Council?!!
The reason I keep harping on this FREE Vit. D via the sun thing is I'm incredibly afraid that this will be yet another instance of big Pharma selling us "health"; when, in the end, all we have to do is show a little common sense.

As in the case of the incredibly fairskinned person upthread. Too fair? Well, then, don't go outside. But most of us can build up to 20 mins. 3 times a week by staying out 3 mins. then 4, then 7.

It's like exercising. You have to start somewhere.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC