Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton supposedly granted a respite to someone while he was President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:11 PM
Original message
Clinton supposedly granted a respite to someone while he was President
I am wondering if anyone knows to whom and for what reason. A respite is not a pardon but a delay of sentence pending appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. I never heard the term before today. Maybe Clinton did it but it's damn rare...
dunno...
??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Clinton did it to ensure someone's Civil RIghts were upheld
not to hand them out like political party favors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. It was a federal prisoner
I don't know the name.
More recently, President Clinton twice delayed the court-ordered execution of a federal prisoner in order that a study of discrimination in federal sentencing might be completed. The respite power has not disappeared.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZWY2MzRiNTAwZmE3NjZhMzZmODNhMTcyYjUzYzc4MjQ=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. So it didn't keep the guy out of Prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. No.
It simply stayed his execution while they assured his Civil Rights weren't violated. Prudent IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I should have known
it was something like that. The feds had just reuped the DP so it figures this sort of thing happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Good find dsc.
This obviously is how they are planning on saving Libby.
The scenario isn't even close, but details were really never their strong suit.
Just excuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You are the one who did the finding
Clearly they are intending to try this and using Clinton's sensible use of this power to justify their behavior. They are behaving more like Wilson did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. IF the talking point is out there
wherever it originated from has to be on the top of google.
And there it was...ready to be picked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Fascinating. I certainly learned something today!
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. The mighty Clenis strikes again.
I had never heard of a respite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here is what I found....
Most recently, Bill Clinton delayed the execution of Juan Garza in order that an ongoing study of bias in the federal death-penalty system might be completed.<6>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respite

Garza was executed June 19, 2001

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Garza
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. Didn't bush do that for the Enron culprits
and they guy died before he was sentenced. And also how about Abramoff. So they must think we have short memories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. no he didn't
In both cases he let the legal process do its thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC