Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Christopher Hitchens: Scooter is going to jail because he made a telephone call to Tim Russert

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:36 PM
Original message
Christopher Hitchens: Scooter is going to jail because he made a telephone call to Tim Russert

http://www.slate.com/id/2168642/

Free Scooter LibbyThe case gets weirder by the day.
By Christopher Hitchens


If Scooter Libby goes to jail, it will be because he made a telephone call to Tim Russert and because Tim Russert has a different recollection of the conversation. Can this really be the case? And why is such a nugatory issue a legal matter in the first place?

...

The call to Russert was not about Plame in any case; it was a complaint from the vice president's office about Chris Matthews, who was felt by some to have been overstressing the Jewish names associated with the removal of Saddam Hussein. Russert was called in his capacity as bureau chief; any chitchat about Wilson and Plame was secondary.

Does it not seem extraordinary that a man can be prosecuted, and now be condemned to a long term of imprisonment, because of an alleged minor inconsistency of testimony in a case where it is admitted that there was no crime and no victim?

I know of a senior lawyer in Washington who is betting very good money that if the case is heard again on appeal, the conviction will be reversed. This is for three further reasons, which I call to your attention.



:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. "No crime and no victim"?
OK, Chris. Put down the bottle of Tanqueray and slowly back away from the keyboard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Have another drink, Hitch.....Christ, that guy is a piece of work!!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does that drunk
actually believe the stuff he writes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's like saying someone is going to jail for moving their arm.
If they stabbed someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Bingo.
Hitchens' brain is succumbing to drink. In the past this kind of lame logic would have not even occurred to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hey, Tosser! Scooter is going to jail because he
OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE.

If he'd gone states' evidence and had sung like a little birdie about Cheney and Rove, he'd be a free man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. He is going to jail because he lied and obstructed justice
All he had to do was tell the truth... All this other crap is just that, crap, and right wing talking points....

He was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice, not outing a CIA agent... He broke the freaking law....


Christopher Hitches is either drinking or needs a drink, I am not sure which one it is....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hitchens--once again, about as useful as tits on a bull
I see he's reverted to his apparently natual state, that of dumbass neocon thug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. how funny is that?
all three of us were thinking the same thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. ...shaking my head slowly.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is worse, because Hitchens is not stupid. He's simply
obtuse and purposefully ignorant of the effect that the lies spread by Cheney, Libbey et al had on starting Hitchen's favorite war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't read writers who use the word "nugatory"
And the fact that Hitchens is using it as part of the "Free Scooter" movement is doubly disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Noooooo.....
Edited on Mon Jun-18-07 01:51 PM by lisa58
...Scooter is going to jail because he remembered, in detail, a conversation that never happened and couldn't remember anything else - and thought that Russert would never testify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. "Can this really be the case?" Um...no. It really CAN'T, and it ISN'T, and you KNOW THAT!
Whatta douchebag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. "Tim Russert has a different recollection of the conversation"
Well, Russert and the other witnesses against Scooter's version of events. It's amazing the talking points never include those people or the fact that the jury convicted on all counts except one.

It's almost like they are trying to obfuscate the matter. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. A.S.S.H.O.L.E.
no offense to actual anuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hitchens reminds me of the Bruce Willis character in "Bonfire of the Vanities"
A once decent reporter, now on the downside thanks, in part, to excessive vices.

Still a hoot at parties, no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. "it is admitted that there was no crime and no victim?"
:wtf: Who admitted that? It wasn't the CIA or the prosecutor. The only people I've heard admitting to that are the right wing gasbags that keep repeating every chance they get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. "no crime". . . uhhhh can you say "obstruction of justice & perjury"
in an investigation that was looking into treasonous behavior?

"no victim". . .ahh tell it to the Wilsons and the worldwide network of employees and contacts of Brewster Jennings and the speculative claims that outing has resulted in more than 70 directly related deaths. To say nothing of the further allegations that B & J may have sabotaged the planting of WMD's in Iraq via Turkey in '03 or that they may have had leads to expose crashcart's connection with the Pakistani running a "nuclear WalMart" who sold nuclear technology to Iran and South Korea or that it's totally trashed a half a century of diplomatic efforts.

Okay taking off my tin foil now. It's getting hot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. Eventually, Hitchens will end up in prison for killing someone while intoxicated.
I'm sure he'll defend his, Libby's and the neocons' crimes 'til the day he dies 'cause, well, they are all innocent DONCHA' KNOW?!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. "...Given the unsoundness of the verdict,..."
Given the unsoundness of the verdict?

Gee, I guess the jury should have convened in Hitchens favorite pub so he could have counseled them during their deliberations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. Who gives two shakes of a rat's ass
what that inebriate thinks? My dog's opinion is more relevant--because she thinks more clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. Hitchens is not great - at logic or facts
1. It's true the call to Russert was a complaint, but not about Jewish names or Saddam Hussein: "Tim Russert recounted that he had a conversation with the vice president's then-chief of staff, Scooter Libby, on or around June 10, 2003. Basically, Scooter Libby called him, had a complaint, was very angry, used some very clear and firm language, and wanted Chris Matthews and 'Hardball' to stop saying that the vice president had sent someone to Niger." http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/jan-june07/libby_02-07.html

2. It's true that Scooter wasn't charged with breaking the IIPA - so shut up about it. He was charged with & convicted of PERJURY & OBSTRUCTION!

3. See Digby "Update": http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2007/03/rebutting-monsignor-by-digby-most-lefty.html

4. Why should someone with his extremely high level of security clearance be given a free pass if he is in fact as big an idiot as you claim? He can't remember where he learned about a CIA agent, allegedly wasn't sure she was covert but blabbed it to 3 reporters? He needs more than a memory expert. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. .
Hitchens Is Not Great.
How Neocons Poison Everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. Libby is going to jail for one reason
A reason the republicans and their sympathizers want us to forget. HE LIED --- HE LIED UNDER OATH-----HE LIED TO A GRAND JURY.

Didn't the impeach a president for that. No matter in the mix about Valerie Plame at this point. He lied and that's what counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. Booze is a helluva drug. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC