|
We need some shorthand that gets to the core of the pathology of fundamentalism in America today. I propose the term "anosexia".
Like anorexia, anoSexia is a body dysmorphia. The victim of this psychological disorder finds the natural sexual apetities of its body to be gross and ugly, and seeks to eliminate them.
Now, from what I hear, anorexia is a form of self-loathing; but the loathing is directed at the anorexic's own body. Anorexics only injure themselves. AnoSexics cause themselves psychological injury; but they also injure or kill other people. AnoSexics turn their self-loathing outwards, blaming other people for their problem. Sort of like if an anorexic bombed a McDonalds.
Along the way, the constant internal vigilance against the dreaded (but totally natural and healthy) sexual desire causes a change in brain chemistry. Anorexics actually get high on starving. That's why its so hard to get them to stop. AnoSexics move their sexual desire over into the category of "religious ecstasy". At that point, anoSexics form a perverse mutual support system, taking turns keeping up the self-hypnosis and projection.
Unlike anorexics, who really do enjoy starving, anoSexics are total hypocrites. Not a week goes by that we do not hear of some high-placed fundamentalist (a minister or a political office holder, always Republican) being exposed for pornography or child molestation or wife beating or adultery or being a closet homosexual. If an anorexic behaved like Ted Haggard, he would weigh about 300 pounds.
You can't call a person whose actions oppose ONLY people's sexual habits (but not mass killings, economic inequality, or environmental destruction) "religious". You can call them self-deluded perverts, power hungry mysogynists and homophobes. But you can't call these violent, hate-filled people Christians.
I invite you all to use the term.
arendt
|