|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:12 AM Original message |
its March 25, 2008 and the Senate just failed to vote to convict Bush on Impeachment charges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yup ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-26-07 10:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
39. BWAAA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
2. Short term, not happy but delighted that it would be a death knell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
3. Not to quibble but once it's in the Senate, it's not impeachment that failed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I did say convict, didnt i? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Yes..but you also say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
4. Worst birthday present, EVER. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV Whino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #4 |
24. Ditto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-26-07 09:43 AM Response to Reply #24 |
30. No, it's not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV Whino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-26-07 09:53 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I'll drink to that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-26-07 10:00 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. Ramen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
groovedaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
5. Or the shit KEEPS hitting the fan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-26-07 10:27 AM Response to Reply #5 |
35. The public is already disgusted. Check out Congressional "approval" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
7. "So you happy now?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:26 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. look you can call me names all you want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. No names |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
8. It would be 44 Republican Senators + Lieberman (Party unto himself) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-26-07 10:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
34. 1) don't be so sure; 2) So what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
10. The 45 Republican Senators who voted to protect Bush would all suffer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 11:03 AM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Haven't they already committed "political suicide" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Possibly. But I still say an attempt is better than nothing at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-26-07 10:04 AM Response to Reply #10 |
33. Even if they were lauded, better to know what we are REALLY up against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
12. If the proceedings are vigorously utilized to conduct extensive discovery,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-26-07 09:33 AM Response to Reply #12 |
29. Oh no, no, no. Impeachment is a RESCUE operation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BridgeTheGap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
14. So, if you don't think you can win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
15. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtrockville (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
16. The senate doesn't vote to impeach, the house does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ToeBot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
17. Yes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
18. It's better to try and fail, than to sit and do NOTHING. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rageneau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
21. One reason I'd be happy is it would shut the wingnuts up about Clinton's impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
22. Carnac the Magnificent speaks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
23. Hopefully infuriate the populace at the Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
25. I would be satisfied that at least they TRIED to do the right thing, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
26. At that point, All Of The People Will Know how Corrupt the Republicans are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-25-07 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
27. Or, it's March 25, 2008 and the Senate just voted to convict Bush on Impeachment charges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-26-07 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
28. Impeachment is victory. It forces the fascist minions into the open. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-26-07 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
32. Spoken like good, compliant oh-woe-is-us -give-bush-his-money Democratic member of Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-26-07 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
36. That's fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gold Metal Flake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-26-07 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
37. Your "concern" is noted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-26-07 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
40. Better check your phones for taps. They want to hear more of what you want to say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC