Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Terminally Ill Man Executed In Oklahoma

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 08:59 PM
Original message
Terminally Ill Man Executed In Oklahoma
Terminally Ill Man Executed In Oklahoma

POSTED: 6:31 pm CDT June 26, 2007
UPDATED: 6:42 pm CDT June 26, 2007

McALESTER, Okla. -- A terminally ill Oklahoma death row inmate was executed Tuesday after his final appeal for a reprieve was denied by the U.S. Supreme Court.

<snip>

Bland, 49, was terminally ill with advanced lung cancer that spread to his brain and his hip bone, according to his attorney, David Autry. Bland received radiation and chemotherapy treatment, and his doctors said he had as little as six months to live.

Autry had warned that Bland's execution could have been a catastrophe if the veins in his arms were compromised by his chemotherapy treatments before a lethal dose of chemicals were injected as part of the execution process.

<snip>

Autry had asked the Supreme Court to block Bland's execution and decide whether executing a terminally ill inmate violates the Constitution's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. The court denied the request late Thursday afternoon, said Charlie Price, spokesman for the Oklahoma Attorney General's Office.

http://www.koco.com/news/13575908/detail.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is sick. Just let him die. Why kill him if he was in this shape?
I do not believe in the death penalty, and in this case it seems really uncalled for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Isn't Mercy Killing Illegal?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not all the time, apparently.
I've watched too many people die of lung cancer to think they did him anything but a favor, but apparently he disagreed.

Some people want time. Some people want quality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. indeed
how my grandfather A went. i would wlecome the death penalty. why chemo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
31. they had to do it because the dp is about revenge.
If they let the cancer kill him, they wouldn't have had their revenge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let me see if I understand this
Advocates of state-sanctioned murder often roll out the argument that "it's cheaper to kill them than to support them for the rest of their lives." Well, when we calculate the full cost of the appeals process, that argument goes right out the window; the cost to maintain a prisoner on death row until his natural death is substantially less than the cost of trying him all the way through the judicial system. That's true in a case of a normal life expectancy.

It's far more obviously true in the case of a terminally ill prisoner.

So what's the motivation behind the execution, aside from blood-thirsty vengeance?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You answered your own question.
Revenge killing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kiouni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. When they are about to die from "natural" causes
you would think that there would be no point to utilizing the death penalty. More importantly what's the point of having a death penalty that takes so long to invoke that they die from natural causes? The whole damn thing is flawed so just throw it out instead of jerry-rigging it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Capital punishment is inhumane
It is really sad that we are about the only "civilized" country which has capital punishment. Every new form of capital punishment is supposedly less inhumane, but then we find out it is inhumane too. Hell, even if the actual death was painless the wait for it would be cruel. What is even more gruesome is the fact that punishing an innocent person is not that rare.

It just makes me want to cry about the inhumanity we have towards humanity at times.

I recently toured a prison that was active up until 1995 I believe. It was gross! 5 x 7 cells. The entire facility was disgusting. Yet we have people acting as if being in jail was like spending time in a luxury resort! It gives me the creeps just thinking about it, and all the innocent folks who served time there. Saw a list of prisoners. Few had graduated from high school, even fewer had any college. The exhibit on "old sparky" had about 5-6 famous writeups about executions, and at least 2, maybe 3 mentioned that they had to shock the victim twice because he wasn't dead yet. Gross me out.

Sorry for the rant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm really okay with it.
I do not see why this case would be any different than any other convicted inmate facing execution. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanctified Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's cheaper to kill a person than it is to treat their cancer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. ding! ding! ding! ding! ding! we have a winner! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. He probably had a much easier death.
Lung cancer can be a REALLY ugly way to go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. True, but it's kind of like arresting someone in prison.
What's the point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Hell, I've taken care of death row inmates after major surgeries and
screening procedures. What's the point of that? Make sure they're healthy so you can kill them?

Personally, I think the death penalty is ridiculous. Our society is quite strange. The reality is that the death penalty costs way more than incarcerating
someone for life, and if they are wrongly convicted you have a chance to amend their sentence. But why do something that makes sense? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Not popular with some I guess. Must be part of the American psyche.
Were these inmates at Central Prison?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #23
32. I think all of the death row inmates were from Central.
UNC and Wake Med are the only hospitals I know of that care for prisoners. We get them from all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
35. Why do they swab the place they put in the execution needle with disinfectant beforehand?
Just one of those habits we get into.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. A TWO TIME KILLER!! Cry me a fucking river and let him burn in hell.
Edited on Tue Jun-26-07 10:06 PM by seriousstan
If there is a God, he will suffer from his lung cancer in hell for time eternal.

Jimmy Dale Bland was sentenced to death for the 1996 murder of Doyle Rains. Before 1996, Bland served 20 years of a 60 year sentence for manslaughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Good thing you're not God!
Very sad to see someone wishing another human being would "suffer in hell for time eternal."

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. It's a good thing that there are no wrongly convicted people on death row
The death of one innocent via state-sanctioned murder irrevocably invalidates the entire nominal justification for capital punishment, which is frankly pretty flawed in any case.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. But...but...but...he had been put away in prison where he would never kill again...
until he was let out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Where's your sypathy for the "real" victim in all this? You know, the 2 time killer.
I am sure he had a very bad childhood that I should worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. So, in your world, the only two options
Are "let him go free to kill again" and "kill the bastard," right?

It must be simple to live in such a clear-cut, black and white world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. Believe it or not, I would like to see a moratorium on the death penalty...
because while I honestly have little objection to it in theory, there are major flaws in its current practice. I'm in agreement with the USSC decision of 72 which led to that moratorium. Particularly their discomfort with the "and unusual part" Which, as you are probably aware, had nothing to do with method of execution, but instead with how capital cases are pursued. Alas, despite my wishes, there is currently no moratorium. In light of that, and this may be a bit cynical upon my part, I'm not unduly saddened that the gentleman in question was executed rather than receiving a commutation of his original sentence. Perhaps he was a victim of his time?
I am not bloodthirsty nor do I possess quasi-religious fervor.
Which is the more barbaric and sadistic:
terminating a man's existence
or
locking him in a cage for decades?
Also, I do believe in prison reform. It is stupid to incarcerate someone under the present conditions and then expect them to "be good" upon release when they are given little or no resources. Patently stupid.

And...dude, it was more mordant (or at least sardonic) than snarky. Snarky...jeez

peace,
mitchum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Shaw Fan?
If not, you have unknowinly made one of Shaw's arguments (in Major Barbara, if I recall correctly) about which is worse, locking a man in cage (and sentencing another man to watch him) or ending his life.

I also agree that a moratorium is a good idea, for the same reasons you mention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. My college adviser was a major Shavian...
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 02:38 PM by mitchum
although I read some of Shaw's work, I picked up a lot by osmosis :)

One of the things that I find confounding is whenever I pose that question to those who consider me to be a "bloodthirsty sadist", all I ever receive in response are...cricket chirps.
I may be a cynic, but I suspect that those suddenly silent ones, for the most part, have no problem with what they consider to be a brutal underclass (other prisoners and corrections officers) handling the miscreant. Everything is fine with them as long as executions don't occur "in their name"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. I Thought I Was One Of The Last Of Them!
I'm a major Shavian, and hate Tony Blair for having the nerve to belong to the New Fabians (let alone what he did to Labour), but I digress.

People who can't wrap their heads around that proposal can't - or won't - consider its implications about our current system, even without executions. While I'm not sure Shaw's idea is workable (he didn't think it was), some days it is very appealing: after so much, a person simply can't be forgiven or trusted any more, and with regret, must be removed. Permanently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datadiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. My brother in law died from lung cancer
Believe me, they did the guy a favor. I have never witnessed anything so sad or excruciating in my life. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. really that's what i'm thinking
why can't i have this option for myself to be executed when i am terminally ill? it almost seems unfair
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. First we need to make sure you are not mentally ill.
For God's sake, the State wouldn't want to put you out of your misery if you were depressed and feeling suicidal. A lot of psychiatric help would make you see the bright side of life, make you feel life is worth living, a reason to believe, and then give ya the lethal dose. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. The Death Penalty is Barbaric.
Kill someone for killing others. Old Testament Bullshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. No, barbarism would be turning the murderer over to the tribe or family...
of the victim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VTMechEngr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
28. Agree. I watched someone die of Lung Cancer.
That guy got off way better. I watched a man go out screaming in pain from lung cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. I watched my mother die from lung cancer.
It was not a pretty sight. And she suffered immensely toward the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
34. State funded euthanasia
Lucky man. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC