Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Following Threat To Cut Off His Funding-Cheney Admits He's Part of the Executive Branch

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:20 AM
Original message
Following Threat To Cut Off His Funding-Cheney Admits He's Part of the Executive Branch
Cheney Admits He's Part of the Executive Branch
Vice President Dick Cheney’s office "will not pursue the argument that he is separate from the executive branch," senior administration officials tell The Politico http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0607/4679.html.

"The decision follows a threat by Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL), the No. 3 House Democrat, to try to cut off the office’s $4.8 million in executive-branch funding." Emanuel had scheduled a vote on Cheney’s funding for Thursday.

more at:
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2007/06/27/cheney_admits_hes_part_of_the_executive_branch.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. the power of the purse at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
39. of course
he's ALL about the benjamins! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Cheney blinked!
Boy, that was easy. He didn't even attempt to send out his attack monkeys this time.

The better news is, everyone is now more focussed on what Cheney is acutally DOING in the Executive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you.
This man has taken so much flack while enriching his cronies that he could step down tomorrow and there will be dozens of billionaires who will care for his needs and his children's needs for the favoritism they've received due to Cheney's machinations. And, yet, Cheney blinks. Maybe it's because he can't stand using his own money for anything, he's so accustom to using public money to buy his every need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
37. Dick is a sniveling sneaky coward. He will slink away
to attack us from the rear again, the bastard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
40. right
he won't be able to fly under the radar like he was doing before....thanks in part to the watchful eyes of many DU'ers!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
46. Money is Cheney's achilles heal apparently...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Cut off his funding anyway, for not complying with security regs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. Damn right! No archive no funds! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Now follow the law and turn over access to your confidential papers for security checks.
This is good for now he has to follow the Law or explain why he won't..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. Just what I was going to say...
Maybe he can explain where the 10% he skimmed off each of the agencies budgets went. Could you in your wildest dreams think of where he put, used, or stashed away that 50 Million dollars....this should go to the top of the investigating list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
47. I don't think he has any papers to inspect....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. ok, so now back to
what the fuck he is up to



gee, a year ago he shot his friend in the face, now he shoots himself in the foot!

dickwad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. WTF...?????...FLIP FLOPPER....The Idiot thinks he is the EMPOROR....Humpty is what he is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. What message will this send to our enemies?
They'll see that the government is weak and doesn't even know what it's doing!

What a surprising lack of resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #15
58. Yup, those that despise us are laughing at how fight among ourselves to the point
of unilaterly weakening our Nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. will he turn over notes and records now?
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 08:37 AM by Solly Mack
that only says he won't pursue that particular arguemnt...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Wait ... if he was claiming 'executive privilege' when he was claiming
that he wasn't in the 'executive branch', then how come his docs couldn't have been seized then?

(I've been away) ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I dunno
but this little piece of bullshit talking point is what they will be going with now

David S. Addington, Cheney’s chief of staff and counsel, wrote in a three-paragraph letter to Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) on Tuesday that the executive order on classified national security information does not give the archivists authority over the president or vice president. Addington said that therefore it “is not necessary in these circumstances to address the subject of any alternative reasoning.”

Addington is saying Cheney (and Bush) doesn't have to turn over his papers and what Cheney said before (“not an ‘entity within the executive branch’ )doesn't play into it because this (quote above) argument trumps that one and that makes it case closed as far as they are concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
38. In other words, cheney and bush don't answer to ANYONE. They just want their $$.
This is the MOST FUCKED UP administration that has ever inhabited the people's house. They are doing everything they can to mock the government and constitution of this country. And we're PAYING THEM TO DO IT!!!

This is just wrong on so many levels.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. Yes - that is what Addington is saying
that the President and VP hold a unique place in government that puts them above certain oversights.
That oversight infringes upon the office of the executive and impairs the executive, thereby rendering the executive ineffective. That Congress is overstepping its power when it attempts to seek oversight of the executive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
48. Emmanuel just put a really, really big
red target on his back.

It's one thing to cross the political swords as parties due, it's another to cross Deadeye Dick.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good job Rahm! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. As much as one hates to admit it, he does deserve a pat on the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I think we have enough people who express dismay and demand apologies - we need to get better
at playing hard - and for congress the best weapon is $.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
57. Yep. I thought his move was going to backfire on him
by accepting Cheney's premise. Most pleasantly surprised to see it didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. Which is it, you Big Dick?
Neither or Both?

Either way you're going to have to pry open that filthy little crust and corruption filled box where you've been doing your dirty dirty business....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ha Ha!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. Then let's cite them for breaking the laws regarding security documents and oversight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #12
26. Thank you! Strike whilst the iron is hot....
Darth Cheney doeesn't back down from many fights....so let's get him whilst he's vulnerable...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
14. Freakin republicon flip flopper
What a pack of no account flip floppers the CONS are....sheesh, pitiful, they are pitiful and shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
17. And so ends the story. Guess we showed him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
30. Indeed...this will be the end of it, though we'll still have no archive
This is ridiculous. All DUers celebrating here have been took oncfe again by the political "game," as if it is all form, no substance. The question at issue has to do with him turning over those documents, not which argument he pursues in order to NOT turn over the documents. So, until he makes a full accounting under the law to the National Archives, he has won, again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
21. Too late.
His funding should be cut off until he can produce a complete archive of his time in the vice presidency. No archive no funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
23. Come Friday
and he has his money, we will see what tune he sings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
24. OK! So turn over all the papers you've been hiding. At least the ones
you haven't shredded. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
25. In my best Cartman sing-song voice
Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-HA!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
27. Money talks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
28. Who wants to lay odds that this "blink" is temporary only to avoid current vote?
I wouldn't bet against this "admission of Executive Branch membership" as being a tactic to avoid the Emanuel effort. Once the noise has died down, he will reassert the same dictatorship bullsh*t.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. I tend to agree with you, NA
That was way too easy.

I predict we'll have to go through A LOT of these maneuvers to get Cheney to either be more forthcoming, or resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Cheney won't change..
.. until Congress changes and ousts him,
tries and convicts him for crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
54. Yep ...
WAY, WAY, W A Y too easy ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #28
51. Of course! He's ADMITTED nothing, he just "isn't pursuing the argument"....
...leaving him free to "pursue" it when it suits his purposes again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
56. He's drawing too much attention to himself
People might want to know what he's spending all his money on and then they might start asking who he spends his time with. He doesn't want that kind of attention. Better to backdown and difuse the situation now and wait for a better time to fight again when people aren't looking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
32. Bush plans public hangings. Dems threaten war gravy train. Bush backs down.
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 09:57 AM by Peace Patriot
Dems double cars on gravy train, add two coal cars, grease the tracks.

'We'll have no public hangings in this country,' Harry Reid triumphantly declared.

It's a dance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
33. R.E. calls, Cheney raises.
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 09:57 AM by formercia
Watch Congress get bluffed again and humiliated.

I didn't see Darth fold his hand.

As for the documents,they're already shredded and turned into sludge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoGreen Donating Member (299 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
34. Cut off the OVP funding until it is resolved...
Take the 4.8 million and let's have Mr Cheney ask for it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
35. well, that's over. La did da da da. Move along, nothing to see here.
Nice one Rahm.

Props from the left!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
36. Well, that's mighty big of him. Can someone please make him accountable for violating the law now?
He did just admit that he's a part of the Exec Branch, big revelation. He's also admitted that he hasn't been following the laws since 2003. Hello??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
41. Lost this battle, the Sith lord has not.
Return he will, and with an even stronger force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
43. What's his game on this one?
Cheney could have funded that office out of the spare change in his own wallet. Dick doesn't fart unless there's something subersive going on in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #43
50. Not sure we want Dick funding his own VP office
:scared: I can only imagine trouble lies that way....

But that doesn't explain this inexplicable fold from Cheney. He moved very fast to defuse that talking point and get this issue out of the media's scrutiny. So Rahm has to keep the pressure up to get those papers into the Archives - I guess the question is, will he? Will he threaten to withhold funds until Cheney agrees to come back under oversight?

And I am afraid that the issue of Cheney's breaking the law since 2003 will now be swept under the carpet with this latest maneuver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
44. Loser!
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 10:48 AM by BurtWorm
Wimp!

Chickenhawk!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
45. Flip-Flopper!!!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
49. Now throw his ass in jail. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
52. David S. Addington,
David S. Addington, Cheney’s chief of staff and counsel, wrote in a three-paragraph letter to Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) on Tuesday that the executive order on classified national security information does not give the archivists authority over the president or vice president.

Addington said that therefore it “is not necessary in these circumstances to address the subject of any alternative reasoning.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
53. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the article saying cheney still isn't going to comply?
He isn't going to comply because he feels the archivists have no authority over him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
55. The politico article gives no indication of intent to comply with the archivists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC