"Tony Blair is to become a Middle East envoy working on behalf of the US, Russia, the UN and the EU."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6244358.stmIt's the quartet of tender implications. The Russians aren't too keen anyway, and isn't the EU, US and Russia somehow under the UN, being regions/nations? How can you work for so different partners as these four and keep your integrity? Especially when you don't have one to start with.
I found a shred of early Blair thunk on Wikipedia:
"Blair stated in his maiden speech in the House of Commons on 6 July 1983: "I am a socialist not through reading a textbook that has caught my intellectual fancy, nor through unthinking tradition, but because I believe that, at its best, socialism corresponds most closely to an existence that is both rational and moral. It stands for
cooperation, not confrontation; for
fellowship, not fear. It stands for equality".
The Labour Party is declared in its constitution to be a democratic socialist party,rather than a social democratic party—Blair himself organized this declaration of Labour to be a socialist party when he dealt with the change to the party's Clause IV in their constitution."
I bolded out the interesting quotes, seen in today's political picture. He's changed, hasn't he?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Blairhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clause_IVHere's a graphical presentation of that change:
http://politicalcompass.jpagel.net/extremeright