|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
sabra
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:37 PM Original message |
Libby to Cheney: "I will not be sacrificed so Karl Rove can be protected." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. Uh, Libby, you were anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. He sacrificed himself, just not for Rove. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
25. The Aspins, connected at their roots, turn in clumps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:57 PM Response to Reply #25 |
64. LOL The Aspens are rolling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. this is getting interesting (and a nom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I think the lifeboats are getting full of rats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. Rove is under the bus RIGHT OUT OF THE GATE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. A belated Fitzmas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeff In Milwaukee
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Orthodox Fitzmas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. LOL! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 03:59 PM Response to Reply #14 |
76. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #14 |
80. ahhhh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katty
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
47. better late "Fitmas" than never! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:43 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. Take that you Smirking Republicon Crony, you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #12 |
68. LOL!!! Thanks for that! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #3 |
88. Yes, but he's not on the indictment. Could he have immunity for his testimony? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 07:02 PM Response to Reply #88 |
91. we don't know all, but Fitz had to stop prosecuting the leak and do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Wed Jan-24-07 12:13 AM Response to Reply #91 |
104. If I had to bet, I would bet that Rove walks free. Totally. Free as a bird. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Wed Jan-24-07 09:46 AM Response to Reply #104 |
110. If I had to bet, I'd bet with you. Still, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrite
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 11:33 PM Response to Reply #88 |
103. He probably cut a deal. That seems pretty likely to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Wed Jan-24-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #103 |
105. Come on--would YOU talk without immunity? I sure wouldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrite
![]() |
Wed Jan-24-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #105 |
106. Yes, he would have had to have been promised it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
6. kick kick kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
8. Duh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
9. Oh my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
10. Oh My, Just Oh My |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
11. Old guy with a young trophy wife and young kids looking at decades in prison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patrick J Fitzgerald
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #11 |
54. Moi Aussi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
13. This is getting really messy from the start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 07:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
92. Shhhh.....! They'll hear you! Leave them their delusions... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hav
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
15. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
16. Then he should have sang like a Canary if he knew what they were doing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Instead, he kicked dirt in the umpire's eyes with his excuses and evasions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
17. I hope everyone has their "Sorry Jason Leopold" posts queued up.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. *snort*!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Since I kept my powder dry, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Excuse me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Jason Leopold did a huge article about Rove being indicted. Rove made a deal with Fitz and the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
33. Aah ok. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gasperc
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:43 PM Response to Reply #26 |
58. Will Leopold be vindicated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #26 |
78. 'Liar' is one of the nicer things that was being said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 08:32 PM Response to Reply #78 |
96. I stayed out - but I sure was upset about how some castigated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. I guess some people still believe Fitz is sitting on a "sealed indictment" for Rove? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 06:29 PM Response to Reply #28 |
89. Remember, though.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. hehehe...I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:01 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. bwahah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:07 PM Response to Reply #17 |
32. Sorry Jason! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #17 |
40. Well, I read the article and I don't see how this exonerates Leopold, yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. You're right, it doesn't exhonerate Leopold at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ladyhawk
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 05:16 PM Response to Reply #45 |
81. Correct. Leopold wrote some very specific things that were not true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 07:16 PM Response to Reply #45 |
93. If Rove "will never be" indicted and the "investigation is over", why do you care about Libby trial? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadparrot
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #40 |
63. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DancingBear
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
77. Why?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 06:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
90. Are you saying that the 24 business hours nonsense should be forgotten? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
20. Divide & conquer, Fitz. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ktlyon
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 05:58 PM Response to Reply #20 |
86. that is right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
29. Hahahahaha HHHAAAAAA hahahahahahaha .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IWantAChange
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
30. A House of Cards + a Big Wind = Disaster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
31. I'm hoping this guy spills the beans the way Dean did during Watergate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morgana LaFey
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:49 PM Response to Reply #31 |
60. He'll never be the man Dean was, but maybe he's got enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happydreams
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 05:33 PM Response to Reply #31 |
83. Interesting comparison. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 09:17 PM Response to Reply #83 |
97. No, but it was Dean's testimony that opened the can of worms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ewagner
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
34. Ooohhhhhh, this is better than I thought! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
35. Fitz couldn't have had better timing than this!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
36. Hey, Scooter!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:24 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. So is the whole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
37. I wonder how the loss of GOP power in 2006 affected Libby's willingness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:18 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Good point! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
39. does anybody else, besides me, picture the inner workings of this cabal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:22 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Now, there's an image. I bet Cheney is Moe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentblack
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. Nah.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:23 PM Response to Reply #39 |
53. That's it!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #39 |
69. Nyuk nyuk nyuk nyuk nyuk! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patrick J Fitzgerald
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
43. He who laughs last... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #43 |
74. I never thought I'd say this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cass
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
44. So, isn't this an admission that something improper did indeed occur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbonkowski
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:05 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. Improper? Yes. Crime? Still deny-able. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citygal
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
48. And these are only the Opening Statements. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RonHack
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
49. Sing along with me, everyone! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shain from kane
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
50. Libby, the bear sneaked up on you from behind, and screwed you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cmd
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
52. The Aspen are exploding! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 05:35 PM Response to Reply #52 |
84. Spring is early this year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
55. Too little, too late for mea culpas....go directly to jail, do not pass GO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuckinthebush
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
56. Oh you sweet little fool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gasperc
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
57. Damn, who did Karl Rove have to fuck? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
59. This is very surprising to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. Maybe he was waiting for a while and it never came. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluestar
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 03:05 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. That's what I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patrick J Fitzgerald
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
61. Jason Leopold..! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #61 |
71. Hi, Jason. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happydreams
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 05:37 PM Response to Reply #61 |
85. Leopold will be vindicated. I've always thought he was set up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Reader Rabbit
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
66. Think they'll have the balls to call Joe Wilson to the stand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
67. Turdblossom exposed and it ain't pretty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
70. The Aspens are turning late this year. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wizard777
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
72. Set up like a bowling pin. Knocked down. Ain't that just how it is with the Bush's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
73. fitzgerald took apart the ryan republican machine in illinois |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #73 |
79. And is now aiming at Blago. Ethics before politics. What a novel idea. nt nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
75. So, does that justify committing perjury? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happydreams
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
82. BOOM! This is hot in so many ways. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
87. Well, Well, Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #87 |
99. Circular firing squad--What happened? They get hold of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
94. Check. Mate. The jig is most definitely up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freethought
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
95. OK, "Scooter". If you don't want to the the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
98. Thank the lords of Karma |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fightthegoodfightnow
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
100. Libby Gets to the Root of the Problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
101. Why doesn't Scooter just take the fall -- Doesn't he think that bush will pardon him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrite
![]() |
Tue Jan-23-07 11:31 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. Because he won't be able to practice law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Wed Jan-24-07 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
107. Wish I had bookmarked more of those Fitzmas carols-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
connecticut yankee
![]() |
Wed Jan-24-07 07:13 AM Response to Original message |
108. The sharks are circling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Wed Jan-24-07 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
109. Hehh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flying_wahini
![]() |
Wed Jan-24-07 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
111. all I can say is may Budda bless Fitzi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC