Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I remember how several of you turned on Fitzgerald.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:02 PM
Original message
I remember how several of you turned on Fitzgerald.
"Fitzmas is a BUST" you said.

I also remember how several of you turned on Truthout/Jason Leopold.

Ha!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. it was downright UGLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
82. VERY ugly
First time I ever used the "ignore" feature, in fact. I got over it, and removed people from ignore, but damn, I couldn't believe some of the downright evil posts.

Patience is a good thing to have, and it's going to be so much fun to watch these guys turning on each other!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
116. their crow will be quite tasty in a humble pie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Was Rove indicted?
I missed that. Got a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He apparently made a last minute deal
in order to save his own neck.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Really?
Link for that allegation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. last minute deal after he was indicted?


Leopold was unambiguous in his claim: Rove was indicted by the grand jury and, on May 12, served with a copy of that indictment and given "24 business hours to get his affairs in order".

You still think that was true? If so, and the indictment was quashed or dismissed as part of a deal with Rove, what do you think Fitz got in return?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. How do you think Fitzgerald
found out that Libby destroyed a note from Cheney, that would have shown Libby was a liar?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. I am assuming it was an "electronic" note, e-mail
and Libby deleted it but didn't know enough to truly wipe it out. That is speculation on my part but it makes sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. The note was from Cheney
Cheney is not the emailing type.

I'd be surprised if he even knows how to turn on a computer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #48
60. That, too, is an assumption, imo
We don't know whether Cheney used e-mail or not, I haven't heard or read anything that specifies that he does not use e-mail as opposed to bush who expressly stated he didn't use e-mail not because he couldn't but because he knew it leaves a trail.

I guess we will find out whether it is a paper trail, an electronic trail or a witness testifying to the original existence of the document only when it, whatever it is, is introduced as evidence or the witness testifies to it's existence.

However Fitzgerald discovered it's existence, there is NO doubt in my mind he has the necessary hard evidence to prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. I'll wager you're right about the email.
electronic records are a bitch. You delete something, but there's virtual copies everywhere.

Ghosts in the machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. How did Fitz get ahold of the NYT column, personally annotated by Cheney?
the answer to both questions is: by subpeona.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. How do you subpeona
something that has been destoyed? Someone has to tell you about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. It was electronic communication...
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 01:46 PM by Tin Man
"deleted" by Libby, and subsequently denied during the GJ investigation.

Except electronic communications are much more difficult to destroy than a paper note. Oopsie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. Who said anything about email?
Fitzgerald said Libby destroyed notes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. Here's what Fitz said (or what firedoglake is reporting Fitz said)
"VP notes–Libby knew that note was in his file. But he wiped it out."

"Wiped out" is an odd way to describe destroying a paper note, but a common way to describe deleting an electronic communication or file.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #62
75. Of course, "wiping out" might also describe lipstick scribblings on a bathroom mirror...
Maybe that's how folks communicate in the WH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #62
83. I suppose we'll find out for sure
soon enough.

Keep in mind, these blogs are not exact transcripts, so we shouldn't split hairs over wording at this point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #83
91. Johnathan Alter is on Franken right now and said, re this issue...
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 02:55 PM by Spazito
he thinks, due to the use of the term "wiped out", it most likely refers to it being something dictated by Cheney to a clerical assistant (my term, not Johnathan's, he could have used secretary, I am not sure) who, in turn, transcribed the contents onto the computer and sent it to Libby.

This would say Alter is in agreement with Tin Man re the connotation of the phrase "wiped out".

Edited to correct a typo, belatedly discovered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:47 PM
Original message
The old school guys like Cheney
still probably do dictation, so that sounds like a reasonable explanation. I wonder if Cheney dictates to tape?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
100. Wow, excellent question! Watergate redoux?!?
Hmmm, would Cheney be arrogant/stupid enough to do what Nixon did? Given all that has happened I would hesitate to say No to that, rofl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #47
74. How would he of known about an annotated column
with the benefit of being told? Is he the Great Karnak now???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #74
79. It's called "discovery procedings"
and it's how evidence is aquired. Specific knowledge is not a prerequisite for investigations to gain access to documents potentially pertinent to the case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #79
86. And they would of known to ask about the
annotations on the NYT article? I could see them asking if he read the article... You have to wonder why the article was just laying around or had been filed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
78. I knew Fitzgerald would want to keep his reputation as
a great prosecutor and he better come up with convictions

which knowing him thats a certainty

Ken Star is probably the only pitiful investigator who came up with only a Blue dress

Fitz has made the Independant Investigator back in the great respect department

Democrats getting House and Senate was a big boost to

Ya all know Gonzales is going to get in on this also :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #78
87. Gonzo Boy needs to be impeached first
I believe you just need a simple majority to impeach the AG.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #43
89. what does that have to do with a deal with Rove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #89
97. Fitzgerald appears to know things,
like this note that Libby destroyed, that had to come from someone on the inside.

I could be wrong about it coming from Rove, but this info had to come from someone on the inside that's cooperating with the prosecution. Of course, there may be a number of people, including Rove, that are cooperating.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yes, I know. It still doesn't mean Leopold was right...
he's not offered an explanation to my knowledge. He still needs to.

It's not as if that was his first unethical reporting as a journalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. We don't know that he was wrong yet either. Lets wait and see what unfolds. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
88. Well, he was apparently "unindicted" if he was indicted at all.
And, that is what some here speculated "Rove cut a deal." I was among the speculateez. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ha is right. Read this artcile by Leopold. Good stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. HA! Is right!
:bounce: Don'tcha just love saying, "I told ya so?" :7 I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:09 PM
Original message
How is this "told ya so"?
Where is the proof of Rove's indictment on Leopold's timeline?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's never to late for Fitzmas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Leopold was a liar/ Truthout fell for it
Karl Rove was not indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Karl Rove was going to be indicted..which means Leopold is not a liar. KKKRove made a deal
to save his own ass, but it sounds like his ass is STILL in trouble!:rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Linky? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Linky... Libby's gonna turn on Rove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. LOL...thanks for the linky!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
63. Hate to be the grammar nazi
but "going to be indicted" is not the same as "was indicted." Leopold is still full of shit. Rove was NOT indicted in the past but may be in the future. BIG difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #63
72. Ya WOHL!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
77. says who?
A deranged drug addict who has been previously fired for making up stories?

How about a CREDIBLE source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. You're STILL trying to shit on Leopold? GIve it up man!
Maybe you should pay attention to the actual trial proceedings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
65. How do the trial proceedings
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 01:56 PM by Goblinmonger
prove Leopold right in any way. Leopold shit on himself when fabricated sources, plagiarized, and all the other shitty things he did BEFORE the truthout story. The fact that anyone would trust him at all is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
71. I don't have to poop on Leopold
He's already up to his eyeballs in BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
92. Well I see all the regulars are out with this thread
I am on this board every day and I hardly ever see these posters post a thing except when it comes to this thread.. Then the bad-mouthing starts all over again as if they are picking up from their last post almost 9 months ago...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. And, 4,3,2,1, they show up here to repeat it
There are a number of DUers whose motives I simply do not trust.

Down with the War on Fitzmas! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Give Urd and Neo a belly rub for me
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Will do!
And do the same to your gang for me, with an extra belly rub for Trinity for her sassy tongue. :D

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Nah, CatWoman was just luring them all to one thread, so that those who have been
following this for years can discuss it without all of the Leopold bashing. It's brilliant. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Here's what I don't trust
People who blindly believe someone who has, at best, a sketchy career as a journalist. There is still no prove that what Leopold said is anywhere NEAR the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. well,
I don't trust goblins!!!

Sprites are much better people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
67. Don't even talk to me about sprites
they are just fancy pixies, nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #67
103. ROFL!!!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. I don't trust people who can't see the forest for the trees
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Stay tuned. Leopold is about to be vindicated.
read the trial transcript. The url is posted on a thread about firedoglake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
68. I trust Will Pitt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #68
106. well, I did
until he went all "bald" on me :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. not me. i am a wait and see kinda gal. still waiting. still seeing n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. Huh?
I dressed as Fitzgerald for Halloween once. It was fun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I think he is sooooooooooooo fucking
CUTE!!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. I was even handing out Libby's indictment to people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. Not me.
Though tough, I've waited to see how things would shake out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. is that Sibel in your sig line?
she is one beautiful lady

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. Yes it is. We can all hope one day she can have her say.
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 01:23 PM by mmonk
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
28. I always felt it was a "sealed" indictment, but was not sure.
I thought Rove could have cut a deal at the last second. I took a wait and see attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. anything is possible, I suppose
But I'd like someone to offer at least some idea as to what Fitz would've gotten in return for a deal to dismiss an indictment against Rove.

Any thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
30. They should have listened to those of us from Illinois
We know Fitzgerald well, and love him! One thing he absolutely is NOT is political. Don't let the media fool you into thinking that he is. He in no way resembles Ken Starr. It was a huge surprise that he was appointed.

I don't know how it will all end up, but I'd put my money on Fitzgerald in a heartbeat every time.

As to Leopold, I still don't think he lied or made up the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
31. Okay naysayers, who are you going to believe?
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 01:18 PM by Cleita
A cabal of Bush sycophants who have been proven to be liars over and over again, or a reporter who may have reported something in error, but whose work by and large has stood up as factual and truthful.

The answer as to who the real liars are here is pretty obvious to me. I too am not passing judgement until the outcome of this becomes clear. Right now we don't have the whole story, but I'm pretty sure Rove and Libby et al will be shown to be guilty as charged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
32. Betcha I wasn't one of them !
Ha !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
34. I'll admit to complaining about the slow pace Fitz moved at.
But I thought the whole Jason Leopold thing was a bit of an over reaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ByeDick Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
37. Ha!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #37
90. Well hello!
You haven't been posting much. You were onto Cheney from the beginning. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
39. " I knew you could eat all them eggs Luke"
Going to be a lot of that in the coming days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #39
57. OMG, that's funny
:rofl:

"you see, what we have here is a failure to communicate"

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
40. Many of those who were posting tripe about Fitzgerald appear to be gone now
You'd see the baited thread every once in awhile "what ever happened to Fitzmas" by some new person who wasn't even a member here at that time. Oddly, these people seem to be MIA now. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
41. Yep, it seems, from the Libby defense opening statement,
Karl Rove was the bad guy not poor, little "Scooter", roflmao. That can only mean Rove struck a deal with the government to save his sorry ass and the Libby defense is going to try and paint a target on him and impeach his testimony.

I alway believed Leopold's report on Rove and felt that Rove made a last minute deal and still believe it. The repeated finger pointing to Rove in the defense opening statement only strengthens that belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
42. I never went after Truthout, Leopold, or Will Pitt.
For some reason, I am immune to things like jeering, bullying, and DU "clique" politics.

The crowd that carried out these incessant smears are the usual suspects. Always telling the rest of DU how much smarter they are about.....well....everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
44. we need to reopen those wounds??
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. come into the wound. the wound is good. the wound is wise.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #54
64. can I bring salt?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
46. I never doubted
that he had constructed brick by brick a formidable case against Libby that even the most slippery of weasels could not foil.

Go get 'em, Fitz.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SodoffBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
51. Fitzie and Leopold together in one post?
Jesus, talk about being outclassed...

What's Leopold been doing lately? Crushing beer cans on his forehead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
52. Not me!
HA HA!

:D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. LOL
Of course not you, Swampy!!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
58. This is going to be hilarious the next few days
Cheney's a gonerl; THANK YOU, Fitz!:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
59. Not me, I just got tired of the constant references to "Fitzmas"!!
it was cute at first and then it became over blown. But any criminal case takes time and people are impatient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
61. Well, Fitzmas is HERE! and it's gonna STAY
for four to six weeks!!!! It's Karma time!
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
66. Never doubted Fitzgerald,
Leopold & Truthout, another matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
69. What, if anything, does one have to do w/the other? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. what "don't" they have to do with the other? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #70
76. Better yet, what "do" they?
:) You're linking together two seperate people, two seperate events, as if one vindicates the other. It does not. Fitzgerald might well come through on indicting more people - I've always thought that Cheney was his real target, and his MO is to get the little guys to implicate the big guys. But that doesn't change the fact that the Leopold story was wrong when it was published, and is still wrong today. Rove was not indicted in May 2006. So, I'm a little perplexed as to why people should apologize for thinking a story was wrong, when it was in fact wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #76
80. 1. 2 separate people; same case
2.2 separate events; same case.

It was said Fitz wasn't going to indict anyone. He did. He indicted 2 separate people in the same case.

Rove made a deal at the 11th hour.

scroll up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #80
84. Was the story right? No
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 02:35 PM by Marie26
So, should people apologize for saying it wasn't right? No. BTW, Fitzgerald has not indicted 2 seperate people, only one - Libby. The person who claimed upthread that Rove "made a deal" at the last minute never provided a link for that claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #84
110. But Fitz made a deal with Rove in order to get Libby...
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 03:03 PM by Tin Man
You know, he threw back the BIG fish in order to get the LITTLE fish.

Common practice among fishermen and prosecutors...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #110
111. Uh-huh
Oh yeah, prosecutors do that all the time. That's why Fitz cut a deal w/the Illinois governor in order to prosecute a low-level mob guy instead. Or was it the opposite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
73. Me?
Huh? (grin)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #73
93. Yes
YOU

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #93
96. It wasn't me!
It was Tim Russert, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #96
98. or maybe this guy?
:)



that's the cover that made me *swoon*

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
81. Merry Fitzmas CatWoman


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #81
94. MERRY FITZMAS
:hi:

this is great, isn't it?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
85. I would never turn on Fitzy.
I wasn't too keen on this Fitzmas business I just played along. But the man is good at what he does. He's awesome. He's tenacious. He's relentless. He's the ultimate prosecutor. He's as independent as they come. I could go on and on about him but my fingers would fall off from the typing. :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #85
95. I know of your lust for The Fitz
:hi:

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #95
99. The thread that keeps on giving. Nominated. It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year.......
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #95
104. And you're not the only one, CatWoman!
Let's try and keep it on the down lo. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
101. Looks like we have several people running for mayor of
Parsing, KS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
102. No, we said Leopold made shit up
and TO didn't have the honesty to 'fess up.

Remember 5th floor, all day meeting, Secret Service, locked room, May 12th?

That, boys and girls, would get a kid sent to his room until he learned to tell the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #102
105. Shall we dance?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #105
108. Only if we waltz
I'm too fucking old for anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SodoffBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #102
115. Some people are born to be the eternal cheerleader
despite the evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #115
117. Well, I do have an awfully cute pair of pom-poms
Gimme an "F"

Gimme a "U"

Gimme a "C"

Gimme a "K"

Gimme a "U"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
107. My high expectation euphoria DU days are over
And Liepold was a part of that. (and I miss Fitzmas but it's too little too late-in my book-we need more than a little time in prison for Scooter that is almost in the end meaningless to the whole thing-he's not the point!)
Until these cretins are actually out of (namely Bush, Cheney and Gonzalez-since they are truly committing crimes against humanity) office, behind bars, or running to Paraguay I won't feel at ease in the least. Nor even excited. I believes it when I actually sees it with my own eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
109. i expressed some doubt about the story of Leopold....
if I turn out to be wrong, i will gladly admit it and apologize. has this been shown to be the case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #109
112. Not yet.
Odds are you'll continue to be in the "not wrong" column for some time to come. Something like eternity comes to mind...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
113. LOL
I remember stating that I'd rather watch the preparation of a full course meal than fast food. Go Fitz. I'm loving it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
114. This is an amazing day
I'm so glad FDL was able to live blog the opening statements. I have a feeling it's going to be the gift that keeps on giving!

Julie
still president for life of the PFEB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
118. Locking
Please don't call out other DUers. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC