Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Department Tips Off Senator Stevens Before Searching His Home!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 08:57 AM
Original message
Justice Department Tips Off Senator Stevens Before Searching His Home!
Edited on Tue Jul-31-07 08:58 AM by kpete
Is That Legal?

July 31, 2007
Justice Department Tips Off Senator Stevens Before Searching His Home!

The FBI and IRS's execution yesterday afternoon of a search warrant on the Alaska home of GOP Senator Ted Steven has been widely reported by now.

What's striking is this tidbit in today's WaPo:

Stevens said in a statement that his attorneys were advised of the impending search yesterday morning. He said he would not comment on details of the inquiry to avoid "any appearance that I have attempted to influence its outcome." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/30/AR2007073001427.html?hpid=topnews


http://www.isthatlegal.org/archives/2007/07/justice_departm.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's known for weeks his head was on the chopping block; I'd
be shocked if they found anything of substance, and bet his shredder has been working overtime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I bet if he had the time, he would have put his home in the shredder too. Unfortunately
for him (and fortunately for us!), his home is a good part of the evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. There is probably some forensic evidence...
..in those clogged up Inet tubes under his house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. He still has to worry about Bill Allen though
and whatever documents have been obtained from his end. Remember that Allen and his VP have already pled guilty and are no doubt wheeling and dealing to minimize their punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Do you think they found anything incriminating?
This,like all things from the DOJ, was a whitewash.

If they'd let the guy with the money in his freezer know in advance that there'd be a search, I bet they wouldn't have found anything there either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Exactly! But Jefferson wasn't a republican, after all, so they didn't give him the heads up.
They're very careful about warning innocent republicans vs. warning guilty democrats.
:sarcasm:

I wrote a post in a thread last night wondering why/how they were going after Stevens, when the justice dept. could have just buried this, which is more in keeping with their M.O. where republican crooks are concerned.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Membership has its privileges. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. I am not surprised
And that is a sad, sad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. k&r
We don't want people to continued to think there is a real investigation underway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. well that was mighty considerate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. "any appearance that I have attempted to influence its outcome"
Interesting that he would have to say that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. Not to worry. Repubes have a habit of rolling over on each other, and
his cohorts will be no different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. Have you ever been investigated by the FBI?
Before they even begin questioning you, they give you a statement to sign that says you understand that you are being investigated and this includes the possiblity of the following:

1. you may be followed (surveilled)
2. your phone may be tapped
3. your mail may be examined
4. your family, friends, acquaintances and neighbors may be contacted
5. a warrant may be obtained to search your personal property

So EVERYONE who is investigated by the FBI knows their home might be searched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. Edwin Meese gave Ollie North 24 hours to shred evidence. By the
time he allowed agents to secure the evidence, it was long gone. Looks like the same thing is going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Is it the usual practice to inform a suspect's lawyer about a raid?
I thought that kind of thing would kind of defeat the purpose of a raid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC