Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Taser Kid" told them: 'You didn't do anything wrong' -

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:06 AM
Original message
"Taser Kid" told them: 'You didn't do anything wrong' -
GAINESVILLE - Police have released the incident report detailing the Tasering of a University of Florida student during a campus forum with Sen. John Kerry Monday, and the officer who actually Tasered Andrew Meyer wrote in the report that Meyer later told police, "You didn't do anything wrong."...
http://www.starbanner.com/article/20070918/NEWS/70918007/1053/BREAKING_NEWS
..."As (Meyer) was escorted down stairs (at the University Auditorium) with no cameras in sight, he remained quiet, but once the cameras made their way down stairs he started screaming and yelling again," Mallo wrote.

Mallo was one of two officers who actually rode in the vehicle as Meyer was escorted to the Alachua County jail, and she said said he told them during the ride: "I am not mad at you guys, you didn't do anything wrong, you were just trying to do your job," according to Mallo's account.

Mallo also wrote in her report that he asked, at one point, if cameras would be present at the jail.
Clarissa Jessup, who was standing near Meyer just before UF Police Tasered him and took him into custody, said Meyer asked her to film him asking Kerry a question just before he approached the microphone."

This guy is a piece of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, come on.
The whole point of tasing someone is to make them more "compliant". Let the cops tase you a few times, and see if you don't start feeling a whole lot "friendlier" to them. I know what I saw on the video, and it was totally unnecessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Seriously. 6 cops on one guy and they can't get cuffs on him?
Please.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yes. Those cops better spend a little more time in the weight
room if they had to struggle cuffing an unarmed subject who was already on the ground.

It was an embarrassing display of the lack of even the most basic arrest control hold techniques.

Imagine if the guy had been the least bit violent. They probably would have peed their pants and then gunned him down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
50. That was my thought..
the cops need to buff up and not rely on tasers so readily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Self delete. I apologize for starting a discussion I have no desire to be a part of. My bad. nm
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 02:07 AM by dicksteele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Sorry Dick, I don't buy that six cops couldn't cuff this subject...
especially if he wasn't under the influence or wasn't a big muscular guy.

I'm familiar with situations like this first hand as well, and there are a few control holds that can be utilized to gain pain compliance...not the least of which is a twist lock.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. So you think it was a setup? They didn't like the questions
so they gathered together and agreed that he should be tasered, but "first let's act like we can't cuff him." ?

They must be Kerry's Skull and Bones security team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Sorry. I know you're being sarcstic about something, but
I really don't know what your point to me is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. " I don't buy that six cops couldn't cuff this subject"...-cboy4. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Self-delete; this was a TEMPORARY post for Cboy's viewing. Please see my deleted post above. nm
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 02:40 AM by dicksteele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It was totally unnecessary alright.
I will never understand why someone's right to deliberately disrupt is more valuable than 100 plus other someone else's right to peaceful assembly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I agree..
The cops shouldn't have caused such a disruption!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Thank you.
Best response I've read all day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. One reason why: the First Amendment.
Each person has the same right as that guy to speak their piece. Most people have nothing to say, so there is no problem. I cannot understand that people on DU are so ignorant about how the First Amendment works. You cannot be arrested simply for being a little loud and speaking too long and making a few gestures that don't hurt anyone. The police lost it. It is not a crime to disrupt a peaceful assembly unless you get violent to persons or property. Code Pink disrupts Congressional hearings, etc. all the time. And we all agree that they have the right to do it. As long as it doesn't stop the proceedings, I think they should be allowed to stay at the hearings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #17
41. He had no right to infringe on the rights of others to speak
He cut in front of others waiting to speak and grabbed an open mike.
Fuck him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. He should have been placed on probation, not arrested and tasered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. No. He should have been arrested for Disorderly Conduct
and removed, though not tasered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Also a possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. for cutting in line
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 02:51 PM by Whisp
if this Andrew guy got, say, 4 shots of tase for cutting in line And grabbing a mic.
how many do you think I should get for cutting in front of others in a lineup to see a movie? 2? 1?

what if I cut in front of John Kerry in the line up? how many? 6, 12?

dangerous precedents are being set here. no excuse ever for something like this to happen and it's quite unsettling to hear so many people think it's okay and even humorous.

Don't you wonder about the fact that the 'rules of law' are becoming harsher and harsher for us peons and laxer and laxer for the top crime bosses?

spelling edit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
35. That does NOT justify the taser. They could have cuffed him without
using excessive force.

Why is that so hard to grasp?

Your argument is a straw man argument. Allowing him to disrupt isn't the issue, excessive force while removing him from the lecture hall is the issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. The cops are in more trouble than he is. They have good
reason to lie about what he said when he was conveniently out of reach of the cameras. Besides, it's irrelevant. They had no probable cause to arrest him. That's all there is to this. He is a confused kid. He likes attention. He made a scene. Had he not been arrested and tased, the whole matter would not have even made the student newspaper. The other students would have let him know in their way that they didn't appreciate his behavior, and nature would have taken care of it. The evil is in the police officers' over-reaction. In my view, it was the officers who ruined and distracted from the event, not this crazy guy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. And cops never falsify police reports.
Especially when in need of covering their asses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. This is great, accusing the police officers of falsifing
the reports. Do you think all of them even get along with each other much less trust each other enough to do this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
36. Are you telling me you think every police report ever turned in is true and accurate?
Come on, seriously. That's incredibly naive.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. You make some unusual leaps of logic
--There have been cases where police have falsified reports, therefore this report is falsified.

--I think that it is wrong for you to accuse the officers of a crime without any proof, therefore I am saying that police have never done wrong.


How about this- Your arguments are worthless, therefore I will move on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #40
49. You are falsifying my claims.
Where did I say these cops actually did falsify the report. I merely don't believe things as naively as you are doing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
53. Do you proof that the police falsified the report?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't care, really.
The tasering of the student was wrong. It was a fucking disgraceful act of unneccessary violence that follows a long line of disgraceful acts of unnecessary violence. I'm sick of people tossing out meaningless strawmen ("he was annoying" "he was loud" "he was a disruptor" "he has a website"). Nothing that kid did at the Kerry event warranted this type of police overreaction. It's really disturbing to see some liberals spouting the same authoritarian bullshit meme as those at Fox News and The Free Republic. I mean, WOW! Some people wouldn't know what facism was if it zapped them repeatedly in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. When police officers instruct someone to leave a facility
and the suspect starts wrestling, screaming and acting unpredictably they should not be expected to handle it mano a mano. There have been physical techniques that subdue people quickly but have been outlawed by the same people complaining about tasers. The choke hold was done away with, after Rodney King many police officers would rather tase than be seen on camera swinging their baton.

Many police officers have lost their lives in the line of duty- look at some of these police shows of traffic stops where suspects pull a gun and fire in a split second.

When you resist you are placing them in a very high risk situation, so first rule don't resist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
54. You mean "fascism"?
In any case, if the kid didn't want to be tasered, why did he continue to resist arrest, even after he was repeatedly warned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Let me see if I've got this correct.
Taser boy has no credibility with you and other anti-taser-boy Duers because he was merely seeking publicity. He stridently asked questions which you are certain he intended to be rhetorical after the allotted q and a time was up, then had a little tantrum when his microphone was cut off.

Cops jumped on, pinned down and then tased the guy while he was subdued because they thought annoying taser boy was trying to incite a riot. Discredited taser boy says that those cops were just doing their job and you agree with him.

Does that about sum it up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. your screen name is apt
I haven't said anything about "rhetorical questions", the cops didn't jump on him- they were attempting to lead him out of the room, when he decided to resist and try to stay -they fell. As they tried to subdue him and place cuffs on him he was yelling 'Get The Fuck Off Me!" and pulling his arms away, only one cuff was on when he was tasered.

Are you suggesting that because he didn't want to be led away, they should have backed off and called in a negotiator?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. I'm just trying to figure out the purpose of this thread.
Does taser kid have credibility or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. credibility with who?
I think he's a loon. His implication that because Kerry was Skull and Bones he was in on some scam to reelect B*sh is a crock.

I'm surprised he didn't accuse Kerry of being Head Lizard of a secret society 3 miles underground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #28
37. So what if he DID accuse Kerry of being Head Lizard of a secret society
3 miles underground?

How would that justify the use of a taser?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. David Icke has never been tased.

David Icke

According to David Icke reptilian humanoids are the force behind a worldwide conspiracy directed at manipulation and control of humanity. He contends that most of the world's leaders, from William Jefferson Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and George W. Bush to members of the British royal family, are in fact related to the 7-foot (2.1 m) tall, blood-drinking reptilians from the star system Alpha Draconis.

According to an interview with David Icke, Christine Fitzgerald, a confidante of the late Diana, Princess of Wales, claims that Diana told her that the Royal Family were reptilian aliens, and that they could shapeshift.<15> David Icke and others have claimed that U.S. President George W. Bush and his family are part of this same bloodline (Icke, 2004).http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reptilian_humanoid

Icke claims, based on his exploration of genealogical connections to European royalty, that many presidents of the United States have been and are reptilian humanoids. In his view, United States foreign policy after September 11 is the product of a reptilian conspiracy to enslave humanity, with George W. Bush as a servant of the reptilians.

He also theorizes that the reptilians came to Earth from the constellation Draco. One type of reptilian entity that people see during alleged encounters resembles reptoids similar to those that are addressed in the studies of John Rhodes and the Reptoids Research Center(s).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
48. You're straying from the point....
but I suspect that may be on purpose.

Now would you like to tell me what difference it would make if the kid was asking about all this? You actually think that would justify him being tased?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. I think he could have been standing there silent and he still
would have been run in to trouble if he refused to move away from the mic.

He was not tasered for what he said, he was tasered for resisting arrest.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Yeah, and the use of the taser was not warranted. It was excessive force.
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 04:36 PM by cui bono
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. Great, but let's get past the assertion that he was tased (tazed?)
for bringing up some sort of forbidden topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. So you agree. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. I don't agree that it was excessive. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #57
58. Then I don't understand why you chose your user name.
What does it mean to you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truthiness Inspector Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm not surprised
This guy was out to make a "statement" and get publicity as a "victim."

He failed. He is a run of the mill sack of shit trying to make cops look bad. Remember, the officer who wrote this report had to undergo a full background investigation to even get hired. The turdball only had to show up and start shit.

The officers involved will (should) be vindicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. So, has JK ever answered the questions? 'Cause
I'd like to know the answers.

Also, did taser boy break a law -- besides resisting an unlawful arrest?

I'm not trying to be argumentative; I'd really like to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetheonlyway Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. I want Kerry to answer the questions too
the only crime Meyer committed was holding an a**hole that sucked $40M out of the democrats pockets and who CHOSE NOT TO PERSONALLY BIND to the only lawsuit with real evidence of fraud in Ohio, to hold that a**hole (kerry) accountable.

not really a crime that carries a punishment except for us americans NOT HOLDING the criminals in the state's capitol accountable.

my only wish was that he did not have to suffer for holding his politicians for which his taxpaying dollars pays their bills, accountable to doing their frigging jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
24. Oh, cool! Can I tase him too, then? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
27. So what?
He didn't want his situation to go from bad to worse. He was trying to be nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Yeah, you can tell he has a real need to
please people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oscarmitre Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
30. Kid thinks all cops are Republicans
His comments were probably made in exactly the manner they were reported. Why do I say that? Because the kid's comments neither help nor hinder the cops. They have bugger-all to do with the incident. If the cops used excessive force on him then the facts will speak for themselves and his "you were only doing your job" doesn't mean much. It would certainly not be enough to get the cops off the hook if they were in strife.

So it seems to me that he was there to cause a disruption and to get arrested. He got his wish. He's telling the cops, "look, no hard feelings, you blokes were just handy props".

If they used excessive force then they should be dealt with according to law and any employment conditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
31. Historical perspective
Annie Kenney, together with Christabel Pankhurst, has somewhat of a run-in with Mr Winston Churchill on 13th October 1905 in the Free Trade Hall in Manchester when she posed the question to Churchill and Sir Edward Grey, "If you are elected will you do your best to make women's suffrage a Government measure?".

http://www.iknow-northwest.co.uk/tourist_information/manchester/oldham/saddleworth.htm


Campaign for Women's suffrage continues

On 14 October, two young women decided to go to prison rather than pay a fine for causing a disturbance. Christabel Pankhurst and Annie Kenney were the first to be jailed for demanding the right to vote.

Uproar broke out at Manchester Free Trade Hall, England, when the women demanded to know if a Liberal government would give women the vote. Their protest came at the end of an election address by leading Liberal politician Sir Edward Grey, when Pankhurst and Kenney stood up and unfurled their banner, saying "Votes for Women". Their behaviour provoked an angry reaction from the crowd, who threw the two into the street, where they were arrested by police.

In 1903, Christabel Pankhurst had founded the Women's Political and Social Union with her mother Emmeline Pankhurst, the pioneer of women's suffrage. The arrest marked a new militancy in what would have been a peaceful political campaign.

http://library.thinkquest.org/27629/chronicle/1905.html


Christabel Pankhurst
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Christabel Pankhurst (September 22, 1880 – February 13, 1958) was a suffragette born in Manchester, England.

Along with her mother Emmeline and others, Christabel co-founded the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU) in 1903. In 1905, Christabel Pankhurst interrupted a Liberal Party meeting by shouting demands for voting rights for women. She was arrested and along with fellow suffragette Annie Kenney went to prison rather than pay a fine as punishment for their outburst. Their case gained much media interest and the ranks of the WSPU swelled following their trial. Emmeline began to take more militant action for the suffragette cause after her daughter's arrest and was herself imprisoned on many occasions for her principles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christabel_Pankhurst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
32. Good luck justifying police brutality there, Beria (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Funny, accusing somebody (me?) of being like
Lavrentiy Beria, Stalins' minion responsible for the arrest, torure and murder of untold thousands.

Kind of like Meyer's attempt to imply some evil doing to Kerry because of his Skull and Bones ties.

But not funny- ha ha, the other funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Well, it's hyperbole, isn't it?
skull and bones is pretty fucked up, and yelling insane bullshit about it isn't really grounds to tase someone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
39. This guy has a dubious agenda.
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 07:43 AM by smiley_glad_hands
I'm not quite sure what it is, but I'm reserving judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
42. welp, hope she was recording it
cause if not, just his word against hers on that one.
good ole reasonable doubt if theres no proof :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
45. I certainly always believe everything the police tell me. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC