Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Webb Calls for Diplomacy in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 09:07 PM
Original message
Webb Calls for Diplomacy in Iraq
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/STATE_OF_UNION_DEMOCRATS?SITE=ILKAN&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Democrats blistered President Bush's war policy Tuesday night, challenging him to redeem the nation's credibility - and his own - with an immediate shift toward a diplomatic end to the bloody conflict in Iraq.

"The president took us into this war recklessly," the Democrats' chosen messenger, Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia, said in his prepared response to Bush's State of the Union address Tuesday evening. "We are now, as a nation, held hostage to the predictable - and predicted - disarray that has followed."

Webb, a Vietnam veteran who was Navy secretary during Republican President Reagan's administration, called for a new direction.

"Not one step back from the war against international terrorism. Not a precipitous withdrawal that ignores the possibility of further chaos," said Webb. "But an immediate shift toward strong regionally based diplomacy, a policy that takes our soldiers off the streets of Iraq's cities and a formula that will in short order allow our combat forces to leave Iraq."

Bush offered no such plan in his speech, nor did he defend his proposed surge of 21,500 troops to Iraq before the most unfriendly joint session of Congress of his tenure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. THIS May Be The Start...
Yet to be seen, but if we "operate" on the vision aspect of politics, having Webb who has a son in harm's way "IS" clearly brilliant stretegy! Playing the game of "one-on-one" or "mano-O-mano, who better than Jim Webb?

I'm sorry, but I seem to have missed just WHO it was who made the decision to have WEBB respond, but "whouda thunk" it? Personally, I think it's as simple as being completely appropriate. A man who actually has a son, who just got an extended stay in IRAQ replying to an Incompetent Psycho who calls himself "THE DECIDER!"

I refuse to allow the likes of this man on my TV by design. I'll wait for the reviews here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC