Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

265-159: House passes SCHIP funding with strong support.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 09:03 PM
Original message
265-159: House passes SCHIP funding with strong support.
Edited on Tue Sep-25-07 09:10 PM by kpete
House passes SCHIP funding with strong support.

An overwhelming bipartisan majority in the House voted 265-159 tonight to pass the popular and successful Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act. The support fell just short of the two-thirds majority needed to override Bush’s expected veto of the bill. Speaker Pelosi called on Bush to “dig deeply into his heart” before depriving millions of children of health insurance:

I’m reminded of the Bible tonight, and I speak with all of the sincerity and all of the hope to President Bush in the hope that he will change his mind. To dig deeply into his heart and think about the children in America who don’t have healthcare. Because if not, I think that the President is giving new meaning to the words, ’suffer, little children.’ Suffer, little children, if your parents can’t afford health insurance.

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/25/house-passes-schip-funding-with-strong-support/
and from the AP:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070926/ap_on_go_co/children_s_health_14;_ylt=AmZADio1M_ISgo8ei49a0XgE1vAI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, boy. What will dimson do now? The ball is in his court. Will he veto? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durablend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Is the sky blue? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kucinich voted against it?
I really hope it's not because he thinks kids should have to wait for his proposal to pass before they get access to health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Bill does not cover legal immigrant kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks for the link n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. He implies that he thinks that.
http://kucinich.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=75275

Washington, Sep 25 - Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), issued the following statement after voting against the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) conference report today:

“I cannot support legislation which extends health coverage to some children while openly denying it to other children,” Kucinich said. “This legislation is woefully inadequate: and I will not support it.

“Legal immigrant children deserve the same quality health care as other children receive. It is Congress’ responsibility to address the main difficulties that prevent legal immigrant children from gaining access to health care. Today, we did exactly the opposite.

“HR 676 guarantees full health care coverage for all children. When considering a universal health care proposal, HR 676, the Medicare for All bill, is the only health care plan that addresses three important issues: quality, accessibility, and cost. HR 676 stands alone in an increasingly crowded field of efforts to provide health care coverage to all,” Kucinich said.


It sucks that legal immigrant children are omitted, but it sucks worse to vote against the bill, in this political climate, just for that reason. IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. This is ONE vote of protest. Sometimes, I would like that more
Dems vote in protest. May be more things would get done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. And if the Democratics as a whole had refused to compromise a bit more often...
...perhaps the US would not be in the shape it's in today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. it's called grandstanding
DK is an idiot. He'd rather score political points than work toward any realizable goals.

What little respect I had left for him has completely disappeared with this vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Very disappointing that it fell short of a veto-proof 2/3 majority
In his first term, Bush hardly ever brought out the veto pen, but he seems to have gotten pretty comfortable with it in recent years.

If someone has the roll call vote, can you post it so I can see what nit-wits voted against it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. dang, they need to pick up some votes!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sorry Nancy - Bush doesn't HAVE a heart!
But I thought you knew that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. She would ask this of the Great Deceiver? Hmmmf.
What a waste of breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC