|
Edited on Tue Sep-25-07 10:53 PM by Douglas Carpenter
I happen to spend a lot of time in the Middle East and almost everyone I know loathes Ahmadinejad even among the Shiites.
Absolutely everyone I have met in the Arab and Islamic Middle East opposes any military strike on Iran for very rational reasons.
And one can loathe Ahmadinejad but be suspicious of the real intentions behind all the recent hype. Saddam Hussein was a genuinely evil man way back in the 80's when then the U.S. government was supporting him and the American media was ignoring him.
And one can loathe Ahmadinejad but not loathe Chavez or every contrived "enemy". They are not the same you know.
And one can loathe Ahmadinejad but be aware that this political figure who is not the commander of Iranian Armed Forces and holds very limited power under the Iranian system is an extremely easy person to demonize in an obvious attempt to hype up a military attack on Iran and bring catastrophe on the region and a disaster for the American people.
There is such a thing as critical factually based thinking.
Thinking liberals are capable of multi-tasking.
________________________________________
"I think of war with Iran as the ending of America's present role in the world. Iraq may have been a preview of that, but it's still redeemable if we get out fast. In a war with Iran, we'll get dragged down for 20 or 30 years. The world will condemn us. We will lose our position in the world."
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Vanity Fair, 2006.
.
|