Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Aide To Top Appropriations Republican Subpoenaed In Earmark Bribe Probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 01:19 PM
Original message
Aide To Top Appropriations Republican Subpoenaed In Earmark Bribe Probe
http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_R_lewis13.7530c5.html

Subpoena indicates probe of Lewis is 'back on,' experts say


By BEN GOAD
Washington Bureau

This week's subpoena of a House aide who worked closely with Rep. Jerry Lewis represents the first known movement in the long-idle investigation into the Inland lawmaker's dealings with lobbyists.

The subpoena could serve as evidence that new blood in the U.S. attorneys' Los Angeles office has revived the case, experts said.

Issued by a federal grand jury in Los Angeles, the subpoena seeks both documents and testimony from Greg Lankler, who worked under Lewis on the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, according to an internal memo issued by House attorneys handling the matter.
Story continues below

"It is our understanding that the subpoena relates to the investigation of Congressman Jerry Lewis," House Counsel officials wrote.

Appropriations Committee spokeswoman Kirsten Brost confirmed that Lankler had been subpoenaed. It's not clear, though, what information investigators want from Lankler.

Neither Lankler nor the House attorneys returned calls seeking comment.

more...

http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_R_lewis13.7530c5.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Didn't Yang go to work for his legal team's company?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. yes. Debra Yang was the attorney investigating Lewis. After a year long investigation, she was
put on the list of attorneys to be fired. Lewis' defense team hired her on at a million plus a year salary. Of course, they re saying that she won't participate in the defense. But she was hired by his defense firm, and she of course, has all the knowledge of the investigation. That being the case, Lewis already knows exactly what information they have or don't have. He already bought his freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. She did go to another firm, but don't know if there's a connection:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debra_Wong_Yang

Yang resigned her position as the United States Attorney for the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California|Central District of California on November 11, 2006 to join Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) has raised questions about Yang's departure in light of the subsequent firing of seven US Attorneys. Yang's office had opened an investigation into the relationship between Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA) and a lobbyist five months before she left to join the law firm that represented Rep. Lewis.<1><2> <3> Yang has denied that any pressure was put on her to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. There sure is. That is the firm defending Lewis, who she was investigating for one year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It really should be illegal. She worked for our government investigating corruption, then took a job
with the corrupt investigated. (SHe only took a job with his law firm, and promises not to divulge her information to that legal team, of course.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can we trust those apparently bringing this to light? For what they are worth
I have not seen subpoena's actually accomplishing anything these days and I cannot understand how they continue to ignore them without fear of prosecution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC