Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I am sick and tired of two names in American politics: Bush and Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:48 PM
Original message
I am sick and tired of two names in American politics: Bush and Clinton
Honestly, I really am...

Just don't want to hear them anymore, hear about them, which marriage is good or bad, which one has the better daughters, what the fuck they wear, what party they had, who loves the bible more...etc.

Fucking sick of them, they are not better or more important than anyone else in this country!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. DYNASTIES!
They are What Makes America Now!

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. lays out kinda like this
reagan/bush, reagan/bush, clinton, clinton, bush, bush,.... 24 years of similar names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:01 PM
Original message
I think you mean ...
reagan/bush, reagan/bush, bush/potatoe, clinton, clinton, bush, bush

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Doh - yep - easy to lose count thesedays :) (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken_Hero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
27. ...........
Ha, :D I still remember the E incident with Quayle....what a moran.....(the potato's incident).....that man, made a toaster oven seem like a genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Little did we know that Poppy ...
... had a VP almost as stupid as his son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
42. OMG!
I haven't laughed so hard in a long time!!!

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. I'm (seriously) glad I could be of service.
Edited on Tue Oct-16-07 03:57 PM by TahitiNut
Laughter is a VERY good thing. :-) Giggles and hugs ... the world could use all it can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought we fought a revolution so we wouldn't have royalty. the people are stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Too many people want rulers.
Not leaders. Rulers. It's the end result of the culture of leisure, methinks. People just don't want to think about candidates and the ramifications of voting for them. Don't want to analyze their records and positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. I think it all has to do with the dumbing down of america
that started when Reagan became pres. My father was a teacher then, and they were continually being told that they needed to lower their teaching standards because too many kids were failing classes. They were still teaching civics then too. The dumber the population, the less they care about what their government is doing, and the easier it is for the bastards to get things passed like IWR, NCLB, vetoing health care for kids, wire tapping, ect....I just learned our school system did away with the gifted and talented program. WTF? I have a niece who is just twiddling her thumbs in class while other kids are still doing their work. The teachers can't give her extra work to do in class, but offer to send her home with stuff. The thing is, she's not bored at home, she's bored at school.

Make 'em dumb, and they won't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. If the revolution means we can elect our president, that must necessarily include
even people related to past presidents, if that is the choice of the electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parasim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Of course, assuming the "electorate" really made that choice.
More of the electorate voted for Gore in 2000, yet we still wound up with a Bush...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I agree that Bush had a stolen presidency. But if Clinton is invoked, we are talking
about a hypothetical presidency. And it could be that's what the electorate will choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blashyrkh Donating Member (816 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
47. Even the former First Lady? We ain't talking a long lost cousin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Chelsa Clinton 2020!
:tinfoilhat:

followed by one of the Bush twins ... HELP!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
39. I am moving to Canada!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Only two names are fit to rule over 303 million Americans?
Edited on Mon Oct-15-07 06:59 PM by kurth
You're right. Fuck that shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JMDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Then let's just settle on just one ...
Clintush.

Nah, the right wingers would want their guys' names first, so probably Bushton. Or maybe Bushinton. George Bushinton. Yikes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parasim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. I totally agree with you.
My youngest son, has not known a current president to have any other name than Bush or Clinton.

and he is now an adult!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Me too. You mean in all of America - these are the best families that we can
find to be our leaders? Methinks these are simply two of the cagiest and most opportunistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Cough
Whatever do you mean?

(points nonchalantly at sig pic...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. And that horrifically stupid Jena Bush. Writing a book? Doesn't all of it make you sick? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SyntaxError Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #15
36. What is she writing a book about?
It doesn't bother me though. I wouldn't read it, but there is no reason to be sick over someone writing a book...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #36
48. How important it is to be careful in sex.
This is a woman that was running naked down the halls of an Argentinian hotel and ended up getting kicked out of the country. She spent her life drunk on her ass. She's got the depth of a circus clown. Can't blame her. Look at her parents. Shallow Central.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. ME TOO!!! ............... you say you want a revolution ..............
ME TOO!!!

You say you want a revolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
You tell me that it's evolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
But when you talk about destruction
Don't you know that you can count me out
Don't you know it's gonna be all right
all right, all right

You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We'd all love to see the plan
You ask me for a contribution
Well, you know
We're doing what we can
But when you want money
for people with minds that hate
All I can tell is brother you have to wait
Don't you know it's gonna be all right
all right, all right
Ah

ah, ah, ah, ah, ah...

You say you'll change the constitution
Well, you know
We all want to change your head
You tell me it's the institution
Well, you know
You better free you mind instead
But if you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao
You ain't going to make it with anyone anyhow
Don't you know it's gonna be all right
all right, all right
all right, all right, all right
all right, all right, all right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. # 5 and could not agree with you more. Those two names == CORPORATISTS of the 1st order.


Please Mr Gore ... transform the process as a Presidential campaigner; transform our role in an ever more connected world, as President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. Me three
For no other reason that alone is why I can't support hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm sick and tired of nonsensical hit pieces against Hillary.
If you disagree with her positions and platforms, then spell it out.

Telling people you're "fucking sick of them" is a cheap attack, and one clearly designed to cast Hillary as another Bush.

Honestly, it's cheap and it's silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Why? Don't we retain the right to be "fucking sick of them"?
I think not wanting to have so many years of the samre two families is a perfectly valid argument. I do nort approve of dynastys in this country. Personally, that is not my only reason that I do not support Hillary.I have many but this is a valid argument.I notice that none has defended the choice of two family rule.What would the defense be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. I think it's a dumb argument. Not only that, it's a cynical and deceitful argument...
..because Clinton is not Bush, and to complain about the "same two families" implies that the families are the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Some may think so.I think that so many years of "any " family running things is wrong.
and I don't give a damn who they are. We need new blood.This is not a monarchy and these people are not artitocrats. I wouldn't support the idea if it were Bush Clinton Bush Kennedy etc. We have more people than just a few families. It is not a "stupid" argument because it is against confining the power of our nation into the hands of a very few. That is just wrong. And it violates the spirit of the Framers of our constitution.JMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. Same here! Keep the political royal families of Bush and Clinton out of the WH. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. Kick & R
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. I think we can do better
even if dinasties have existed from the begining

They just have gotten worst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. Pretty shallow rationale ...
... for rejecting a candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #25
38. I will help you reframe: it is rejecting a system, it is fighting a downward spiral to hell...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Then expound on those themes ...
... and how Clinton is representative of the system and its downward spiral to hell.

Your original post contained little but disgust at the names Bush & Clinton.

Keep in mind that if Hillary is the nominee, the Repuke smear machine will try to exploit the "sick & tired of the Clintons" meme. I hope she's not the nominee, but I'll take her over anyone the Repukes nominate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
26. honestly.... me too. n/t
Edited on Mon Oct-15-07 09:22 PM by seabeyond
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. Me too. Don' t like it one bit, either one, even though I'll probably end
up having to vote for Hil in the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
29. Add in Pruneface and it's pretty much it for the last 28 years.
And we all know that the CIA's White House Action Officer was VP Out of the Loop Poppy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
30. there must be 20 candidates and I'm sick of all their names, lol!
campaigning too early for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
33. We're officially entering banana republic territory.
I mean, come on, nominating the former first lady?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SyntaxError Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Maybe if she wasn't politcal...
If you would have asked someone ten years ago if they thought Hilary would ever be president, they would probably say "I dunno, maybe in a ten years or so.." :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
34. Amen, Nimrod!
So am I.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
40. Here Here!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StrongBad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
44. Though I lament the fact that 2 families have had dominance over US politics recently
I can't fault Hillary for the fact that she's (in my opinion) the smartest and most experienced candidate out there that agrees (in general) with most of my views. It's too bad that in a nation of 3 million nobody else can rise to the top now but her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. You think she is smarter than Obama? or Biden? or Richardson?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
45. You're big on the five-line anti-Clinton flamebait, aintcha?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherMother4Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
46. Not me - Our country was in such great shape when Bill was in office.
I long for those days. With Bush - our country is in the shitter ('scuse my French). Can't ever, Won't ever compare the two of them. The republicans go around saying "oh they're both the same, both bad - NO - Bush is the anti-christ - He is an evil-doer.
They say this to get the stink of themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC