Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is The Use Of The Word Cackle Sexist?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:18 AM
Original message
Is The Use Of The Word Cackle Sexist?
cackle
n 1: the sound made by a hen after laying an egg
2: noisy talk
3: a loud laugh suggestive of a hen's cackle
v 1: talk or utter in a cackling manner; "Hello!," the women
cackled when they saw the movie star step out of the
limousine.
2: squawk shrilly and loudly, characteristic of hens
3: emit a loud, unpleasant kind of laughing

http://dict.die.net/cackle/


P.S. I also posted it in General Disussion Politics by error...It received responses so I didn't delete it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, men can cackle too
There are many novels where "men cackle". I suggest you read more and educate yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why Don't You Link Some Passages From Novels Where "Men Cackle"
And I suggest you take your patronizing remarks and shove them up the orifice of your choosing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. The references are there. This has been already covered here at DU...
That aside, I agree that it's a sexist term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monktonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Perhaps...
And yeah that remark was a bit patronizing.
Thing is, when we point out political correctness, one would assume
we dont use incorrect political terms ourselves.
Stuff like "at my age its flattering to have all these men obsessed with me."
Seeing how its next to impossible to speak correctly all the time,
your point is trivial.

Oh and by the way, good morning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. I See Your Point
Edited on Sat Oct-20-07 10:44 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
But does that mean our discourse should be stripped of every innuendo, double entendre, or playful sexual reference...

I think "cackle" is a fighting word as in "Quit your cackling and get me dinner."


on edit- Good Morning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monktonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #27
39. Its more like "quit your cackling and get me a beer!"
Look, if someone was saying dont vote for so and so because women have no place in politics,
that would be one thing and it wouldn't be right.
Thing is, when you put your name out there, you have to expect your gonna get hit from all sides
in ways you couldn't possibly imagine. Does it make using words like bitch, whore, cackle etc. right?
Hell no, but thats the way it is. You cant cry foul every time you hear something you dont like and then turn around and use your gender when it suits you. If you do that, then all bets are off and you've given up your right to special consideration.

Instead of using ones gender as an automatic, built in weapons system, maybe one would care to
stand up on their own merit and answer the question at hand? Like "how do you respond to your opponents criticism?" I want real answers, not playful jokes. I'd expect that from any man as well
and if a man answered a question in that manner I'd think he was a phony.

By the way, I think the use of the word cackle in this case is meant to imply someone is
a witch. not a chicken.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. people on DU already googled "man" and "cackle"- HUGE number of hits.
They were posted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. but that's no reason
not to just start the whole discussion over again

Didn't you see "Groundhog Day?"

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #21
31. I Googled "Man" And "Bitch" And Got 10,600,000 Responses
Edited on Sat Oct-20-07 10:52 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=man-+bitch&btnG=Search

Does that make the use of the word "bitch" appropriate?

I hear men calling other men "bitches" more than I hear men calling women "bitches" nowadays but I don't use it because of its eytmology and the fact it's a fighting word...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
55. Not a whole lot of hyperlinks to specific passages of published novels. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
76. Guess what
stop cackling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Rich From Someone Who Can't Distinguish Between "Guessed" And "Guest"
Edited on Sat Oct-20-07 10:34 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. Please stop. I'm cackling.
You're so funny. I'm sure you aren't taking this debate too seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
35. What a load of craple
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #35
42. Good Morning
I see you're your old self. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
70. No, HENS cackle.
and if men are described as cackling they are being insulted with a feminizing descriptive term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. Absolutely.
I pointed that out in a previous thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. of course it is
so is the use of the words 'the' and 'it'

you just need to use your imagination
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. bush cackles
every time he talks of death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah. I didn't think there was any doubt about that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. no doubt?
google results for "he cackled" = 30,200
google results for "she cackled" = 19,700

It seems that popular usage for the term heavily favors a male connotation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. That doesn't implies a male connotation, just a frequent appellation to males. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
61. a popular way to insult a man if to give him female qualities
on all those references from google for 'men cackling' - the context would most likely be in the same vein as pussy, bitch, etc.
mostly from what I have read, 'chicks' and villains do the cackling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. Absolutely correct. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #61
84. chicks and villains? doesn't that mean
you think that it's not just about being sexist?
... or are all the villains female?

I'm a rather large bearded bald male who tends to wear engineer boots... for years I have been told, by friends, that I 'cackle'.

Are they trying to compare me to women or villains?
Or neither?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
75. stop cackling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #19
36. What Does Google Have To Do With It
I googled man and bitch and got 10,600,000 resonses...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheUniverse Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. I've heard it applied to both Tweety and Hillary in the past couple of weeks.
Seems pretty equal to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. yes. of course.
It's closely related to shrew, witch and bitch. words that are used to describe women far, far more frequently than men. however, due to the rampant,er, antipathy for Clinton, you'll get plenty of folks denying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. yes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. its a term of endearment for the most part (for some of my friends that cackle)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. Anyone who says that someone 'cackled'
should pay a $10,000 fine and get locked-up in a hardcore Federal prison for 10 years. Let's see how funny it is then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. federal pound-you-in-the-ass-prison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I Agree
Anybody that uses the word cackle should be introduced to how to squeel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. "pound-you-in-the-ass-prison", is this supposed to be funny?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. yes, it is. Watch 'Office Space'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Does "Office Space" offer rape humor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
83. watch it and find out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
63. apparently to some it is funny
to be raped.:eyeroll:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Inquisitive Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
71. what?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. No. What kind of Saturday morning silliness is this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. It Seems The Issue Isn't As Settled As You Think It Is
DSB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. yes, it really is. Google has already proven it's not sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. No use. She/He not only DemocratSinceBirth, She/he is
StubbornSinceBirth too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. Is That Why DU Seems Split On The Question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #24
34. Where?
Because some random person said a word isn't sexist it isn't sexist...

What kind of logic is that?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. It is absolutely sexist. Deniers are liars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #24
40. Google as defense? How ridiculous. And it wouldn't hold up in court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. I don't see Judge Judy
This isn't a court case.....yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. People Are Conflating A Lot Of Issues Here
You can find folks that will make an argument that ho, bitch, the n-word , queer, etcetera, are not inherently offensive but they are offensive enough to most folks that they should think twice about those words it or applauding their use...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #45
56. Common sense is a thing of the past
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
28. Not when applied to a hen laying an egg!
Or, when it is true. Hillary's laugh was a delicious and subtle insult for asking a stupid question. I think it is a classic, and deserves a place of reverence in media history! It was NOT a cackle, and calling it that is worse than sexist. It is an insult to a really great response and a good, expressive laugh.

Or, we could just ban politicos laughing :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
32. You are worried about a word being sexist? There are people here that
like show hosts yelling at a woman about ass kicking her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. I Like To Kick Ass
But kicking a woman's ass wouldn't be chivalrous...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. If a guy tells another guy that he throws like a girl, is that sexist?
Edited on Sat Oct-20-07 11:37 AM by durrrty libby
Hell yes, but I'm sure the delusional will disagree


Edit to add. I can't believe people use google as a defense. Silliness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Of Course
Why?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #43
52. Just comparative. I'm sure there are people who would deny
"throw like a girl"" is sexist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #32
93. Jesus, are you still on that kick?
Maher said he wanted to kick her ass OUT of his show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
46. I think of a witch's cackle first, then...
"whistling women and cackling hens, neither will come to a good end."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
47. Is crying "sexism" every time a woman is criticized
sexist?? Yes. I believe it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. If Mr. X
If Mr.X said Hillary Clinton will make her Democratic and Rethuglican opponents her "bitches" would Mr. X be sexist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monktonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #47
53. Ding, ding, ding!!! Finally some sense!
Yes crying sexist everytime a women is criticized is indeed sexist in and of itself.
Whats worse is when you reply with something sexist in your own defense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Just Curious
Would Mr.X be sexist?

And I see a flaw in my question...I should have used the word "pejorative" instead of "sexist"...

For instance if Mr.X and Mr.Y are arguing on a playground and he says "shut the f--k up, bitch" he's not being sexist but he is using a pejorative word...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monktonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. You just answered your own question.
The word bitch in the modern age has nothing to do with being a female dog.
Its about being a whiney, sniveling, little, fraidy cat or a suckling, diaper sniffing, (I want to say mammas boy so bad) fart groveling, chump.
The gender notion has been sucked right out of that word.

Unless of course you use it on a women.
Doesnt make sense to me but......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. I Polled This At DU
It was the consensus that the word "bitch" was verboten because of its etymology or history . I had asked if it was appropriate to say "Hillary will make Rudy her bitch" and was instructed it was not. But as you have pointed out in another thread we give more leeway to those who use pejorative terms to discuss people we don't like...

PEACE

DSB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #53
62. That poster hates Hillary, so the opinion is tainted, therefore null and void
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monktonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #62
89. You dont know me
I never said a bad thing about Hillary.
nice try.
Its the bots I dont like
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #89
90. I was referring to the poster who responded to you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monktonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. ooops! My bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
48. Holy Shit!
You people are serious.


"Cackle" is a sexist jab, but prison-rape humor is funny.

No wonder I'm becoming a bitter misanthrope as I get older.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
50. It's certainly negatively biased
After all, had the laugh issued from a GOP, it would have been a chuckle, a chortle or a girlish giggle.

Face it, no Democrat will ever get a break from the corporate media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
51. I'm voting "no"
because I don't want to give up my prerogative to accuse men of having "rooster syndrome". Plus, both men and women "crow" about things, in a figurative sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
58. Depends on who you support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
59. I'd call it fowlist.
Fowl, fowler, fowlist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
64. Yes. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
65. Humans, in general, should be compared to animals often.
I am serious. Humans forget that they are part of the animal kingdom.
So much of human nature is straight out of a rooster-hen relationship, and I wish that people would look at their own behavior, their own culture, and ask themselves, "do I really think I'm that much more evolved than a billy goat", and if the answer is still yes, then how about trying a little harder to act like an evolved human, and less like a barnyard animal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
66. Have you ever noticed
Edited on Sat Oct-20-07 12:52 PM by Annces
that making women into demons of all varieties is a way to suppress them and keep power in the realm of the male?

Advance of Woman by Mrs. Jane Johnstone Christie

1. there was a first matriarchy (if man had ever wielded power first, he never would have relinquished it);
2. females are pacific (women and animals too); old females governed once during a Matriarchy;
3. the Patriarchy initiated an age of strife, by “variable and fighting males” (p. 65) characterized by “self-gratification” and “general uselessness”. Once they learned the economic value of women, they refused to liberate them. They continually increased their demands for services, power and wealth;
4. civilization has allowed men permission to kill each other first, and then everybody else. Only muscle and force counted as women fell into abject slavery.
5. Thus, women were eventually demoted to “demons” and causes of all evil”; they were burned in India, veiled in Iran and shaved in Israel (and France in 1945).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. Interesting.
All of it seems true, except #1. Is there anything to back up the assertion of a "first matriarchy"?
It seems implausible that a society of cavemen would sway to reason over brute force. As I said before, humans are part of the animal kingdom.

I know that there have been examples of matriarchical societies, but they were the exception rather than the rule. The reason for that, is what I call "rooster syndrome", and probably due to the fact that humans are more like animals than we care to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #68
77. what makes you assume that brute force equates "animal"?
Edited on Sat Oct-20-07 06:48 PM by FarceOfNature
there is no reason to assume that because early humans and their hominid ancestors were perhaps less "cerebral" that they utilized brute force over social cooperation. We see examples of altruism in the animal world constantly.

*on edit* the notion of barbarian cavemen is more a reflection of social norms to see them as such than it is based on any sort of scientific evidence from the archaeological record; there is a spectrum of depictions of pre-modern hominids and early humans that runs the gamut from burly monsters dragging their females around by the hair to peaceful hippie types sitting in a meadow of flowers sharing berries. These depictions tell us more about how we view ourselves in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #77
81. Oh, I'm sure the early hominids had a lot of community bonding time.
Hugs, loving moments, singing songs while gathering wood, gently picking bugs out of each others' hair, etc. But, when it comes down to an argument, I would bet that the "alpha male" of the community would get his way, more often than not. I'm not by any means an expert on this subject, BTW.

The "animals" idea was just a tangent. Lately I've been thinking about how most humans are in complete denial that we're in any way, at all, like animals. People, (religious people especially) think it's a blasphemous idea, and that only humans matter. Reality says otherwise. The reality is that we're just glorified animals who think we're something really special, meanwhile, destroying the earth.

This sub thread sure went off on a tanget!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
69. Isn't it sexist that the book of definition is called a DICtionary instead of a vaginary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #69
80. No-But Why Is It (His)story Instead Of (Her)Story
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #80
86. even worse, removing the uterus is a HIStorectomy--does that mean its for HIS benefit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #80
87. and why do they call the cold sore virus HERpes instead of HIMpes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
72. If sexist is in the eye/ear of the beholder, I say yes.
It definitely strikes me as sexist, fwiw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
73. yes ,because
the first ingrained image of "cackle" implanted in our brains is the witches cackle.It is a very negative thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
74. Who cares
I find the word policing in here very scary at times. Not that you are necessarily engaging in it but if I want to use words like cackle, I will regardless of whether anyone is offended by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
78. Instead of linking dictionary definitions, think about the power of the word in usage.
while it can be effectively argued that this word has a history of being used to describe old, witchy spinster type women who are not "properly" participating in ascribed gender roles and behavior, I do not think that the modern usage of the word is institutionalized in common speech to the extent where it has widely contributed to the debasement of women. In short, maybe the history of the word has some negative connotations, common usage is not widespread or owning of enough negative power to constitute sexist speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
79. I cackle and last time I checked, I'm a male. I can put up pics if you'd like too...
It is not sexist.

Noun definition #2, and Verb definition #3 are incontrovertibly asexual.

Noun definition #3 is asexual because it describes a noise suggesting a hen's cackle. The "hen's cackle" being the most obvious point of reference, and no sexism appears applied nor deliberate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
82. Frequently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
85. No, because before people started breaking out the dictionary,
my understanding of the word was that it referred to a menacing and high-pitched laugh, and it applied to men and women equally.

I'd never even heard the word applied to hens.

Now, referring to a group of women as "hens" is sexist. But I don't see a strong connection between hens and that word, at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #85
91. Oh please you can't even figure out village. Cackle is way beyond you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
88. No -- shriek like a harpy is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC