Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“Socialized Clinton-style Hillarycare for Illegals and their Parents”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 04:10 PM
Original message
“Socialized Clinton-style Hillarycare for Illegals and their Parents”

The hysterical party heads for the fainting couch

Posted October 20th, 2007 at 11:35 am

A month ago, congressional Republicans were so desperate to avoid discussing the substance of U.S. policy towards Iraq, they decided a newspaper ad from MoveOn.org was the single biggest threat to Western Civilization in recent history. The coordinated hissy fit was a transparent effort to distract attention from the issue at hand, but it was also a largely successful sham — Republicans stopped talking about Bush’s failed policy and started talking about the NYT’s ad rates.

This month, those same congressional Republicans are so desperate to avoid discussing the substance of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP), they’ve decided Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.) has replaced MoveOn as Public Enemy #1. (For reasons that defy logic, CNN has decided that the GOP’s feigned outrage is a .)

<...>

In other words, by throwing a fit, Republicans end up looking weak and hysterical. Indeed, it reinforces the least flattering GOP caricature of all — these guys can’t govern, but they can fall onto a fainting couch like nobody’s business.

<...>

For their part, Republicans, as part of the drive to perfect the art of the tantrum, are planning to — you guessed it — introduce a resolution condemning Stark for his remarks. It’d be amusing if it weren’t so ridiculous.


Rep. King’s new name for SCHIP.

Today on the House floor, Rep. Steve King (R-IA) introduced a new name for the acronym SCHIP — “Socialized Clinton-style Hillarycare for Illegals and their Parents”:



For the record, SCHIP stands for the “State Children’s Health Insurance Program” and does not cover undocumented immigrants. Not surprisingly, King voted today to sustain Bush’s SCHIP veto.

<...>

UPDATE: Earlier this week, Rep. Tom Feeney (R-FL) told USA Today that he refers to SCHIP as “Socialized, Cuba-style Health care for Illegals and their Parents.”


A reminder from Will Pitt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. We are in a war for the soul of our country, and not just against Bush anymore.
Couple this kind of hatred with Huckabee's madman comments and you see what we are up against. We are close to the end of this country. Very close. I don't know how we fight back effectively, but if they can get away with describing health care for kids like this, they will soon move to end Medicare and Medicaid, too. It's coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rubberducky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. These cry-babies need a boatload of pacifiers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Damned there is
Edited on Sat Oct-20-07 06:32 PM by vpilot
an idea, lets organize a collection to purchase enough pacifiers to give one to every Republic House member and maybe the Senators as well. We could probably get one of our members with writing skills to make up a card saying something about the pacifier being for the cry babies who cant stop whining about being treated to a dose of truth from Rep Stark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. What a laugh. I guess he hasn't seen hillary's health INSURANCE plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. But, but... "the GOP wants her as our candidate!!1!!"
Don't you read DU???
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. 5th district or 5th grade?
Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. What does standing by the Pete Stark comment gain us?
What does standing by the Pete Stark comment gain us?

Who is telling the truth: Stark or King?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Wouldn't it be great
if as Dems distance themselves from Stark's or other remarks they deem appropriate, they'd call on (out) Republicans to condemn actions/comments such as the one in the OP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Oops: "deem inappropriate." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. The dynamic is fascinating.
Edited on Sat Oct-20-07 04:49 PM by TahitiNut
(1) The GOP Corporatist Wurlitzer spins attacks against Hillary, casting a faux 'liberalism' characterization.
(2) The partisan Democrats react by defending "one of their own" and, in the process, fail to correct the mischaracterization of her positions as being liberal.
(3) That defensive posture morphs into 'support' while the policy positions don't get examined.
(4) When issue-focused liberals point to those positions and criticize them as conservative the defensive antibodies, attuned to the kabuki of the GOP Reich, eat their own.


As an anti-partisan, independent liberal, I'm reminded of the Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight.
What a disgusting, vile joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Good analysis. Sums it up rather well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. hillary,obama,and edwards are all about the same
dennis`s plan is nothing more than what i`ll be getting in 4 years.

the republican`s who voted for killing the program are going to receive a lot more shit than what they are giving hillary. the march of dimes just joined in on schip program..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Steve King is insane.
And I mean that in the clinical sense. The guy needs some professional help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. Is that a photoshopped image of King?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Huh? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Was the sign photoshopped?
Or did he really have the nerve to stand on the floor with that sign next to him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. His audacity is real. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Thanks!
That pisses me off and I just wanted to make sure I was pissed off for the right reason. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC