|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:06 AM Original message |
Disabled Couple Faces Foreclosure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danalytical (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
1. Oh well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Why didn't you read the article? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danalytical (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
35. I did read the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 01:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
26. If you had read the article, you would have seen this, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kurth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
2. And the mortgage brokers already got their billions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
3. Why did they accept a loan for that much per month |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
4. Was there some sort of mental disabilty? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:32 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Sounds to me like a case of "sign here" and lies told. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:55 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. I hope the mortgage broker and the mtg company are thoroughly investigated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
5. How were these people able to state $3,750 a month income when the only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:34 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. They didn't; IndyMac made up that figure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
63. Apparently that's common |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
23. If the couple signed with the fraudulent income, they were equally quilty! period |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. They didn't sign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 03:17 PM Response to Reply #30 |
37. they signed SOMETHING!... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. It wasn't the loan documents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #42 |
51. I did read it and they were STUPID! and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:32 PM Response to Reply #51 |
61. From this post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #37 |
52. You're grasping at straws. You don't think there's any chance they were LIED TO? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #52 |
67. no, no no! They are entitled to there money back, but NOT the house! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. And THEN they should be placed in the circus side-show, as per your previous post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. If the pay is good...why not! lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wcross (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
6. Sounds like their "loan officer" committed fraud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #6 |
17. Without a doubt. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
40. ...and the buyers committed stupidity! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
9. For those who haven't clicked the link to read the article: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:35 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Why read the article? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I'm outraged at the behaviour of the loan company... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. It appears they got the information from the lender |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Someone selling something lied? Shocked. Shocked I am... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. This is just one example of FRAUD and these women were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danalytical (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:51 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. I do blame the buyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 01:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. Amen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danalytical (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Yeah I do blame them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. That's an amazing mind-reading ability you've got there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danalytical (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Look Dick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:06 PM Response to Reply #38 |
48. You're entirely determined to blame the victims of this obvious fraud, no matter the facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danalytical (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. You're wrong, there probably was fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. Who knows what the lender told them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danalytical (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 03:55 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. So what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. What did the lender tell them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danalytical (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:06 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. It doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. Someone who was hoodwinked by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danalytical (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. It's not just the elderly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #9 |
41. There used to be laws to protect consumers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
13. Offering loans like the & misleading people to intice them should be a crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taught_me_patience (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
18. I gotta blame the buyers on this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 02:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. It sounds like they were lied to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
19. They never signed the loan agreement; therefore... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danalytical (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 12:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. But just look at the simple math |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenLeft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. let's hope that no one you care about ever... EVER... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
32. We don't know what kind of BS they were handed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
47. what did the broker tell them their payments would be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danalytical (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. By doing a simple calculation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #50 |
66. if you're purchasing it over a 30-year period, and you're told that you can afford it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. It says they didn't sign the loan application |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
25. terrible this corrupt and insane administration won't be happy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
31. WTH? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
34. I doubt it's their fault. Lenders have scammed the public. Story on PBS's NOW: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
39. Deleted message |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 03:54 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. The last part of that sentence is disgusting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:16 PM Response to Reply #39 |
57. Really showing your true colors today, eh? Nice sigline. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. ---- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #39 |
68. How DARE you talk about disabled and SpecEd folks this way! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
55. There are supposed to be legitimate low-income home ownership programs through HUD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danalytical (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. I tried |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:21 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. Thank you, KamaAina! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
62. So much fraud went on; they are not the only victims. Limited-English speakers were also taken in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #62 |
73. That's so true, Hekate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
64. There is a lot missing here. When a house is sold there is an escrow period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #64 |
70. It's clear that a lot of things that were SUPPOSED to happen, didn't happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-22-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #64 |
75. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
65. Terrible terrible! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
71. "...There are no other alternatives for them to save their home..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
74. Predatory lending with intent to defraud. And a ton of judgmentalism from DUers re the victims. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-22-07 01:32 AM Response to Original message |
76. once the foreclosure is complete, are the couple financially liable for anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Oct 18th 2024, 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC