|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:27 AM Original message |
"I Can Promise You This: The Democrats Will Never..Pursue the President Even Once He's Out of Office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:31 AM Response to Original message |
1. I have no doubt that's true. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:34 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Me, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:43 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. so what do we do about it? what *can* we do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:54 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. "Where do we find ourselves?" -- Emerson, "Circles" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:01 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. We Have Not Only a Plurality, but a Large Majority, for Ending the War |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
global1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 08:26 AM Response to Reply #7 |
35. So What Do We Do About It You Ask - Well We Elect HRC And Continue........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zazzle (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #35 |
88. ....the Bush-Clinton dynasty! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 06:04 PM Response to Reply #88 |
182. You got it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #35 |
148. And those who don't agree to elect Hillary are deemed the rabble rousing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #35 |
256. And pretend we are involved in the process. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zippy890 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
45. thats the question- what is the answer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donkeykick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #45 |
50. Then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:55 AM Response to Reply #50 |
70. Yep. We already know what has happened with a third party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:33 PM Response to Reply #70 |
143. Look, you're not going to break thru with any new ideas until.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:43 PM Response to Reply #143 |
231. Yep! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 12:37 AM Response to Reply #231 |
271. I wanted to vote for Nader, but my kids were so concerned that Bush would win . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:11 PM Response to Reply #70 |
163. It can be done. The Republican rightwing nutcases did it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donkeykick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:30 PM Response to Reply #163 |
212. Kudos to all you said! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 12:41 AM Response to Reply #163 |
272. I've often supported the argument you're making --- and PROTEST DLC in party --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #45 |
145. You've kinda nailed one of the STEPS of fascism . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Thug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:51 AM Response to Reply #145 |
245. Bravo! Agreed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #245 |
268. "The Establishment is a conspiracy --- " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 01:02 AM Response to Reply #45 |
247. Step 1: Reject self-defeating prophesy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 10:13 AM Response to Reply #247 |
257. With due respect, would you explain to me how #4 works? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #257 |
263. An example -- recruit Matt Gonzales to run against Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 01:36 AM Response to Reply #263 |
274. With questions about BETRAYAL by Democratic leadership . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 01:53 AM Response to Reply #263 |
276. Unfortunately, our main and only problem isn't Pelosi . . . it's overall betrayal by Dems --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 01:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
80. Well since the president and the vice president were OUR public officials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zippy890 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #80 |
93. I like your thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #80 |
147. Your ideas are why I thought it so urgent that Randi/Turley continue on .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:48 AM Response to Reply #80 |
244. Good idea, but don't rely on Democrats. Maybe Moveon.org. But the big D party is in it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
87. To start ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:49 PM Response to Reply #87 |
150. Agree -- !!! Town Councils? And if you're not familiar with VOTESCAM . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #87 |
280. Agree and disagree --- we need a point of leverage --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:34 PM Response to Reply #7 |
99. He clearly stated the problem and 'we' refuse to admit there is a pachyderm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
114. This would be the moment were the people by hundreds of thousands pour into the streets & overthrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 06:35 PM Response to Reply #7 |
186. We Need an Impeachment Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 06:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
187. K&R. Because I have such high regard for Turley and his opinions, this is by far the most |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CubicleGuy (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
225. where do we go from here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #225 |
232. Third Party candidates don't scare them. It must be PRIMARY Challengers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
230. First. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:46 AM Response to Reply #7 |
242. For one, don't ever vote for someone that doesn't support your principles. Don't fall for the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Thug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:58 AM Response to Reply #242 |
246. I hate to say it, but I think you may be right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 01:52 AM Response to Reply #7 |
252. we could do what the founding fathers did and take matters into our own hands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alllyingwhores (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
214. So Turley's theory or explanation applies to the Ass Emperor but not Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:09 PM Response to Reply #214 |
226. I don't think I said that, allegedly new DUer "AllyingWhores". THINK before retrying, because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trusty elf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 05:16 AM Response to Reply #226 |
254. Have you seen the original "undoctored" version of that pic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 10:48 PM Response to Reply #214 |
281. Yeah . . . there are parts of all of this which don't quite still make any sense . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
236. Jonathan Turley would never say anything he couldn't back up so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 10:55 PM Response to Reply #236 |
282. What makes me feel that this is a STRONG possibility is the fact that Randi Rhodes .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:32 AM Response to Original message |
2. I greatly admire Turley and trust his take on things. This sucks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:33 AM Response to Original message |
3. R&K #5 ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Suich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:34 AM Response to Original message |
4. Whenever Jonathan Turley talks, I listen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
6. True, that. This should be absolutely clear and obvious to anyone who's been paying attention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:46 AM Response to Original message |
8. time for a purge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dembotoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #8 |
58. amen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lutefisk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:47 AM Response to Original message |
9. Bush will be an elder statesman after leaving office. Cheney, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:51 AM Response to Original message |
10. Son of a BITCH!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:00 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. you know, we (or i) always want to think *our* side is better, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:39 AM Response to Reply #13 |
24. we need something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:11 AM Response to Reply #24 |
61. We need to create our own term limits by refusing to vote for incumbents... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #61 |
63. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 12:30 PM Response to Reply #61 |
77. I'm sending Holiday cards to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FatDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:13 PM Response to Reply #77 |
92. Exactly what I've been thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:22 PM Response to Reply #92 |
96. Ned had grassroots people willing to knock and phone.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 01:34 PM Response to Reply #61 |
84. Great post, my friend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #61 |
91. It won't matter ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:24 PM Response to Reply #91 |
123. That's a given... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #91 |
154. Please see VOTESCAM website ---- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:14 PM Response to Reply #61 |
209. There is a huge problem with what you say. I completely agree with your idea. BUT: The big f***** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #24 |
73. Ouch, to instant runoff voting, at least right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
felipe (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #24 |
85. Dennis said that a while back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #85 |
155. We need third parties, IRV, public financing --- are Dems going to give it to us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #155 |
218. How do I put this politely, F*** no. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 12:23 AM Response to Reply #218 |
267. OK -- then what's PLAN B --- I've been asking this for months -- ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 12:44 AM Response to Reply #267 |
273. I have also. Most of the time I am totally ignored. Best response I have gotten is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 01:39 AM Response to Reply #273 |
275. Next time . . . include a link . . . !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #24 |
152. Hell, maybe we should be hoping Bush invades Iran and BIDEN impeaches --- ????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emcguffie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
173. But without an honest media, nobody would know about it. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:05 AM Response to Reply #24 |
233. Dennis has already introduced impeachment of the big dick.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
283. Our side used to be better . . . !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
105. Term limits: yeh, that oughta keep them lobbyists in their places. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #105 |
133. There is a special place in Hell for lobbyists... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
120. Past Due.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
196. Is this Gilbert Godfrey? Seriously, just how do you propose to change anything. If you haven't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #196 |
284. WAIT A MINUTE!!! Our most hopeless situation is Global Warming ...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:00 AM Response to Original message |
12. Doesn't Make Sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
left is right (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 08:04 AM Response to Reply #12 |
33. Democrats are being threatened and/or blackmailed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #33 |
57. Yep. Wire taps are NOT for terrorists suspects. They are for maintaining power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seafan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #57 |
158. Here's the little kitten with her protector. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:04 PM Response to Reply #57 |
208. And that's what the torture is for as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:51 PM Response to Reply #33 |
113. No, they're just being cowardly and corrupt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:59 PM Response to Reply #33 |
156. Truth hearings . . . one day --- ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:07 AM Response to Reply #12 |
60. Do we have to list the dead Democrats to name the threat? Starting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:03 PM Response to Reply #60 |
160. We sat by waiting for them to investigate --- a real investigation --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 01:07 PM Response to Reply #12 |
79. As Turley describes so well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 06:26 PM Response to Reply #79 |
185. damn, twosparkles! nicely said. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #12 |
285. Agree, we're missing pieces of this puzzle --- and can only imagine that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
14. No surprise here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:02 AM Response to Original message |
16. He probably is right. There appear to be a few who aren't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:10 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. You don't get anywhere in DC unless you're corporate-owned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:13 AM Response to Original message |
18. Edwards will restore our civil liberties if he is elected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:33 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. You have to follow the corporate contribution money trail to get an answer to that question...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zazzle (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
89. Since Obama doesn't believe Bush has committed impeachable offenses, his judgment is questionable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #18 |
117. Remember the illegal renditions of suspects to countries were torture was allowed was in place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #117 |
162. We should check on that --- did it appear in a CIA playbook, or what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:39 PM Response to Reply #117 |
213. You are right according to the ACLU, renditions started under Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #213 |
264. So why doesn't anybody even care Clinton started this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 01:58 AM Response to Reply #213 |
277. Yes --- but when did the playbook come into being? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
179. Will Edwards hold the Bush admin accountable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:06 PM Response to Reply #18 |
223. All by himself?? Bill Clinton had big asperations to before he became president. He seem to forget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Syrinx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:24 AM Response to Original message |
19. he's probably right, but I'm kind of "iffy" on Turley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:11 PM Response to Reply #19 |
164. I didn't know that --- and I'll take a big MINUS for that re Turley . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:26 AM Response to Original message |
20. If Turley's right, the only thing left to do is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 08:41 AM Response to Reply #20 |
37. Pitchforks and torches time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:13 PM Response to Reply #37 |
165. How's your Norwegian? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 12:36 AM Response to Reply #165 |
270. My Norwegion is nonexistent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:31 AM Response to Original message |
21. Much as I like Turley, that's a lot of bunk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:20 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Impeachment *is* the investigation that ends in.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:45 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 08:48 AM Response to Reply #29 |
40. 180 out yet again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #40 |
78. i loved reading your civics class this morning! thanks for kicking ass! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #40 |
126. Great post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #126 |
161. Geography... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #40 |
169. Great piece. You should post it once a day, as an OP or as a response... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 06:27 PM Response to Reply #40 |
265. Delighted to see someone kicking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:08 AM Response to Reply #29 |
54. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:52 AM Response to Reply #54 |
69. sorry, you're just wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:25 PM Response to Reply #29 |
97. Are you out of your mind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #97 |
170. Agree to a large extent: Signing Statements, for one outrage --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #29 |
106. Read the Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #106 |
171. And they need to brush the dust off of their high school civics textbook... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:18 PM Response to Reply #29 |
168. Yes! Impeachment is the process of holding hearings to determine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #27 |
39. BINGO!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 07:09 PM Response to Reply #39 |
192. Then how was Nixon's admin effectively destroyed without one impeachment hearing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 04:02 PM Response to Reply #192 |
262. His circle of advisors knew that impeachment was coming... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:41 AM Response to Reply #27 |
48. Correct! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 07:09 PM Response to Reply #27 |
191. Patently false. Nixon's administration was destroyed before a single impeachment hearing took place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:04 PM Response to Reply #191 |
221. Absolutely wrong! That someone took a walk up the hill and advised Nixon to resign... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:15 PM Response to Reply #221 |
227. Compeltely false. Nixon's resignation followed an -extensive- gathering of evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:46 AM Response to Reply #227 |
243. What do you think John Conyers was doing down in that basement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
224. Right on. But the big f******** D Democrats will never, never impeach. They are afraid, so very |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #21 |
103. Start the impeachment investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voltaire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #21 |
127. Sorry to say this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:16 PM Response to Reply #21 |
167. How did the GOP have "success"...? The public was against impeaching Bill --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:55 PM Response to Reply #21 |
217. So are you saying that someone will be held accountable??? nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:31 AM Response to Original message |
22. That is why it is so dangerous to have a complicit MSM 'protecting' the corrupt.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
felipe (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
94. Edwards is not so believable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #22 |
172. Keep in mind that the corruption of media began long, long ago --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:43 AM Response to Original message |
25. I've suspected for awhile that leaving office will constitute a "get out of jail free card" for *... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:16 AM Response to Original message |
26. Well duh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:37 AM Response to Original message |
28. Trouble Is, The Highest Court Already Found Criminality In Hamdan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thepurpose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:49 AM Response to Original message |
30. If we sit around and wait for them to do it. It will never happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:53 AM Response to Original message |
31. I think this Turkey fella is all wrong......most likely a closet Pub... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qdemn7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:00 AM Response to Original message |
32. Extremely true, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 08:13 AM Response to Original message |
34. I heard this interview while it was happening and was not surprised by what he had to say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #34 |
174. Right . . . going so far as to not prosecute Bush . . . but to forgive those who aided in the crime! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
36. Confirmation of what we already know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Berry Cool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
38. And, also, the most depressing statement on this whole thing that I have ever heard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
41. This answers the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 08:53 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. If they were replaced...maybe we get more vermin with new faces IE Blue Dogs yapping about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:11 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. If they were replaced, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #43 |
59. Yes, I can agree with the notion.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alterfurz (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #43 |
121. my dad always used to say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #43 |
132. What you're talking about ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:35 PM Response to Reply #132 |
176. There certainly weren't supposed to be two official parties, either --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 09:08 AM Response to Reply #132 |
255. I agree with you that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #43 |
157. Thank you for your post on people running. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #43 |
175. It's impossible to run as a Democrat --- you need huge piles of $$$ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zippy890 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
44. Tutrley "these are not principled people in this city " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
46. Of course not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
47. "...parties mean very, very little." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philly_bob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
49. Turley's is second theory I've heard on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 07:05 PM Response to Reply #49 |
190. How can they know they don't have the votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
51. Knowledge is power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:40 PM Response to Reply #51 |
178. Re Moyers . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
52. They not only won't investigate, but they will cover it up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zazzle (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #52 |
90. John Edwards would investigate Bush's corruption!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:50 PM Response to Reply #90 |
112. The Dem candidates need to be confronted and asked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
53. I doesn't have to be that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:34 PM Response to Reply #53 |
100. BRAVO!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:46 PM Response to Reply #100 |
110. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 06:05 PM Response to Reply #110 |
183. Yes it can!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duval (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #53 |
151. Kucinich wouldn't "play the game", |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:38 PM Response to Reply #151 |
177. Each person, one at a time, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
55. Too important to drop. But too frustrating for commentary. A depressed K&R. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
56. I really just don't even want to let myself believe this. A sickened K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:36 PM Response to Reply #56 |
102. Denial is an ugly thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
62. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
64. Sickening, but true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fiendish Thingy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
65. Yet another reason why DU should be renamed dU... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
66. Oh man. That's so depressing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
67. Correct..."disheartening, disgusting, discouraging and infuriating" and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
68. Thank you so much for this - I listened and my heart broke - I knew he was right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
71. What a truckload of B.S. this is. This is lies passing for news talk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 01:25 PM Response to Reply #71 |
82. you lost respect for turley? well, go ahead and live your dream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #82 |
146. first, Turley says judges throw cases out due to state secrets but THEN Turley says if Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 06:48 PM Response to Reply #146 |
188. hello? "state secrets" are being thrown up to judges in court cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasterdemocratkilkil (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #71 |
107. I disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #71 |
137. Right! All those BCCI crooks walked the plank after Clinton took... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladywnch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
72. well, what I'm still not getting is: so the dems made this 'pact' with the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftist_not_liberal (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 12:10 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. It's not all that different from the liberals in 19th century Russia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:22 PM Response to Reply #74 |
201. The Democrats are the bourgeoisie--that's too stupid to even laugh at! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
75. It's important for people in this era to join NGO's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
76. Dems are implicated in this whole criminal enterprise, damn right they are not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:24 PM Response to Reply #76 |
202. How could the Dems get burned by what bush did? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:40 PM Response to Reply #202 |
205. enablers who knew many of bush's statements were lies, and then voting for the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:48 PM Response to Reply #205 |
206. The public sees this as bush's war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:15 PM Response to Reply #206 |
228. stooges is right. Pelosi, wHoyer, Reid = Curly, Moe and larry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 08:12 PM Response to Reply #228 |
266. No. Gephardt, Dascle and Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
galileo3000 (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
81. Maybe I lack your vision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #81 |
219. Fair response. What do you think will happen? nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
83. Prove it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:48 PM Response to Reply #83 |
111. Prove it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #111 |
116. Oh really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #116 |
122. Not all - enough ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #122 |
128. Nope, I don't buy it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #128 |
180. they get explained here every day ?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #116 |
136. prove it? OKAY! "IMPEACHMENT IS OFF THE TABLE"! there! i fucking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #136 |
144. Wow! You're right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 06:53 PM Response to Reply #144 |
189. promise is not a secret signed document. not on *this* planet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:28 PM Response to Reply #144 |
204. You forgot the :sarcasm: smilie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #111 |
118. oops - Being "done" - instead of "down" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:04 PM Response to Reply #83 |
222. Me thinks that if you are on the Titanic and someone said it was sinking, you'd say "prove it". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
86. It is a RACE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southern_belle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
95. k & r ;( |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
98. Not to rain on this parade, but Turley's making a lot of assertions without |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #98 |
130. Apparently it's self-evident |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #98 |
138. (i don't know--but i'm still pissed about pelosi's double date w/bush) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
101. If true, Dem leaders in Congress are breaking the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #101 |
125. Is it just dawning on some of you ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #125 |
134. Sorry, I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
104. Welcome to the human race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #104 |
109. We don't want Stalins in the USA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
108. Of course nobody of the Bushites will be held accountable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orwellian_Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
115. D.C.'s a cesspool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
119. Last paragraph - Naomi Wolf - on a Nazi coup by this admin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wash. state Desk Jet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #119 |
129. It ain,t over until it,s over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wundermaus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:29 PM Response to Reply #119 |
142. too late |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
124. THESE Democrats will do nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
131. "well, it’s possible for civil liberties to be restored but it’s just very rare. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
135. Hey -- thank you! I checked last night and didn't see the program listed yet --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
139. Democrats are just as much insiders as the GOP is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librarycard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
140. I will never contribute to another incumbent, period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
141. Why, pray tell, is DENNIS KUCINICH's name so conspicuously absent from this discussion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #141 |
149. Because we are talking about the people in power that we are MAD AS HELL AT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #149 |
153. ah, thanks for the clarification n\t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:02 PM Response to Reply #153 |
159. But in a sense you are right too - people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #159 |
200. Yes. That is my point exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
166. When politicians don't contest it is usually because THEY have something to hide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 06:02 PM Response to Reply #166 |
181. Yep - all the investigations and outstanding matters left from Bush1 got deep-sixed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #181 |
193. Yes, BushCo grew stronger because they got away with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
184. Well we know the French will go after Bush if he should enter that country after ending his term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DissedByBush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
194. Another missing aspect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
195. I believe that Edwards will ensure Bush accountability because he is a plaintiff's attorney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:26 PM Response to Reply #195 |
211. Even if he does, he would be fighting his party. They don't believe that. Ask Nancy. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
197. Wow damn. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
198. This is exactly why some of us bitterly resent, the lesser of evils bullshit. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dunn (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
199. I wonder if that is why Bush wants to keep the war going...the Democrats could be accused |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:06 AM Response to Reply #199 |
234. now you know rove was telling charlie rose that it was the dems who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
203. I just finished listening to this on the podcast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lint Head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
207. This is an easy one. We are living in a 21st Century fascist country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
210. Please, this post points out the most significant issue our democracy faces. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #210 |
259. Sorry, I went a little over the top on this post. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 10:36 PM Response to Reply #210 |
279. How would electing a Repug help in any way --- ??? Whaaaaat???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
215. This is what I have thought for a long time! I have no heros anymore! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
216. This is the most important post. kick. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
220. "You are powerless. Go back to bed America." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:08 AM Response to Reply #220 |
235. I will continue fighting for it but I don't expect them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:42 AM Response to Reply #235 |
240. Sadly agree. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 01:08 AM Response to Reply #235 |
248. It's not about them. It's about us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 01:30 AM Response to Reply #248 |
251. i like your spunk! (after reading post 247!) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
229. Is anyone really surprised at this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:39 AM Response to Reply #229 |
237. I am not surprised. It will take a revolution to get us back, if possible. Actually, I don't think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:41 AM Response to Original message |
238. Please read my post #210. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 01:14 AM Response to Reply #238 |
249. i did read it. but i don't have a solution. i agree w/your point, but i |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #249 |
260. Thanks, but i think you are the only one to read my response. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #260 |
261. i doubt that i was the only one to read your post. i think a lot of people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 12:35 AM Response to Reply #261 |
269. Thanks for that. I got a little crazy on Sat. To think that the Bush Admin will never be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoGodsNoMasters (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
239. Sad but true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
241. I have to ask with some others here, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
250. as someone who grew up in DC & visits often, I must say Turley is right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 03:11 AM Response to Original message |
253. Thanks for posting this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 10:27 AM Response to Reply #253 |
258. More people need to wake up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-03-07 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
278. THIS should make Democrats question even further PELOSI and DLC --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC