|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:03 PM Original message |
King George's NEW Signing Statement Challenges Several Requirements To Provide Info To Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:09 PM Original message |
ie "up yours, what are you going to do about it"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
8. He knows they are spineless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. Somebody needs to take away his signing statement privelege, just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It is already most likely Unconstitutional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimshoes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. Cut off his funds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
4. "I'm The Decider," quoth the monkey. "Congress better just sit down and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. That is not what he is to use for executive orders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sueh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
6. When the FUCK is Congress going to remove him from office??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1monster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. Sorry Chum, if you don't agree with the specifics of the bill and refuse to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC