|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Smith_3
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 06:15 AM Original message |
Germany doesn't have term limits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 06:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. no term limits in either of my homes either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 06:42 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. A vote of NO CONFIDENCE could have dumped Maggie, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 08:47 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. There are terms, but you can be reelected as many times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 09:07 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. There are no set terms, though. That's just not accurate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 09:12 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. If there are no terms then I dare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 09:19 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. But that's not a term. A term is an established start, and an established termination date. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 09:33 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Parliament serves a maximum five year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. But it isn't fixed, so it is meaningless, and less than democratic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:08 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Undemocratic is when people have no means to remove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. The two wrongs argument doesn't cut it. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:28 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
24. so what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 09:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
17. That's why I wish the US had a parliamentary system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
23. no there are no terms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
3. The US Supreme Court ruled term limits are unconstitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 08:28 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. How could it be "Unconstitutional" when term limits are explicitly provided for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 08:53 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Because that amendment only applied to the White House, not the Senate or House. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 08:56 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Response #3 in this thread deals with Presidential term limits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:14 AM Response to Reply #10 |
21. Not quite. Congress can only PROPOSE an amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 08:32 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. The Supreme Court ruled that in a democracy term limits are not constitutional? That's not how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 08:38 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. You're wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 08:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I guess I remembered things wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 08:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Yes, that's the decision I referenced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
9. Neither does the UK. I wish it did! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
26. now that Blair has gone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
16. Parliamentary systems and Presidential systems are not really comparable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC