|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
ThomWV
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:38 AM Original message |
Poll question: Should The Federal Government Bail Out Homeowners Facing Foreclosure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
I_Will
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. No bail out, but protect against predatory practices on the front-end n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
71. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
2. Caveat emptor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:42 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Naturally, corporations can be as reckless and irresponsible as they want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Of course they can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #14 |
26. It is definitely in their best interest... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:34 AM Response to Reply #26 |
55. And most loans get SOLD to investors / investment funds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #14 |
45. It's not just banks involved. Home loan companies doing bad stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
3. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:43 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Isn't it the Governments job to allow just about everything to happen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:53 AM Response to Reply #8 |
23. Did I just stumble into the Free Republic forum? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:59 AM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Congress HAS regulated the lending industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 12:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
75. Without regulations on lending, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
4. False dichotomy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Lenders should always have the right to foreclose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:49 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. I know what a fucking mortgage is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:49 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Well, I'm happy for you. Now, do you want a cookie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. So we agree then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
6. Homeowners..no But they WILL bail out the lenders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #6 |
52. Exactly ... It Will Simply *Look* Like We're Bailing Out Mortgage-Buyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #52 |
82. The spin is already on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stirlingsliver
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
7. Most Are Victims Of Predatory Leanders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
19. I've got a feeling that you may be mistaken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:13 AM Response to Reply #19 |
40. Many people falsely believed the carnival ride would never end.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 12:02 PM Response to Reply #7 |
67. Who Failed to Do Their Homework |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LondonReign2
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
69. No, a tiny minority are victims of predatory lenders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
10. The reason we should is more practical necessity than moral. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gasperc
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
11. change bankruptcy laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:01 AM Response to Reply #11 |
31. It was called "cram-down" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:02 AM Response to Reply #11 |
32. I don't see why bankruptcy law can't modify mortgage instruments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
12. How about "OTHER?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
13. Helping to prevent foreclosures with refinancing seems like a good idea to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
15. No bailout is necessary. the loans CAN be reworked (longer terms, somewhat higher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainegreen
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
17. Define bailout. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
20. I tried to tell my naive coworkers not to take the adjustable loans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:03 AM Response to Reply #20 |
33. Indeed--there's a lot of that that isn't spoken about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:08 AM Response to Reply #33 |
37. It sickens me that so many in the survey are assuming the most cynical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 01:58 PM Response to Reply #37 |
81. No way should taxpayers be forced to assume the burden of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
21. The money they pumped into the banks and hedge funds would have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michreject
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
22. emphatically, NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:03 AM Response to Reply #22 |
34. The few I know who did the adjustable were new citizens from the Philippines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:04 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Every lender must disclose the full terms of the loan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:09 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Are you sticking up for the banks who duped my coworkers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:11 AM Response to Reply #38 |
39. How about you ask that question in a non-loaded fashion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #39 |
42. lol, nice dodge there! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:18 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. I'm fully willing and able to answer the question, if you pose it in such a fashion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:20 AM Response to Reply #44 |
47. You lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:28 AM Response to Reply #47 |
49. OK, hero... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #49 |
56. I wish I could help them - my company laid them off! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:46 AM Response to Reply #49 |
61. Any time you take out a mortgage you risk losing the roof over your head.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:55 AM Response to Reply #61 |
65. If you are able to meet the operative terms of the contract |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 12:07 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. I guess that's where the downfall occurred.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 12:42 PM Response to Reply #68 |
76. "but it's inexcusable that this was allowed to go on without any government oversight for so long" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #36 |
46. We know there were lots of shady practices going on though... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #46 |
50. I can name a mortgage company that HIRES crooked appraisers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:32 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. So, instead of railing against that company on anonymous internet fora |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #53 |
58. Why don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #58 |
59. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:50 AM Response to Reply #36 |
63. In real life, the closer does more to build a comfy feeling than disclosing details |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #36 |
77. They don't do that for ARMs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michreject
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #34 |
86. Separate issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #22 |
73. EMPHATICALLY YES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michreject
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #73 |
85. This is not a sacrifice of the few |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pegleg
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
24. These situations always wind up with the very rich getting very much richer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:38 AM Response to Reply #24 |
57. Direct hit on middle and lower income class.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
27. other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
29. NOBODY is recommending a BAILOUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The2ndWheel
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
30. Everyone can't have everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
35. I'm amazed how much outrage is generated over bailing out homeowners... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #35 |
43. Excellent point.....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #43 |
78. Thanks. I don't understand how people are missing it. -n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #35 |
74. no shit, I feel like I am on a conservative website right now, not a liberal one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 01:24 PM Response to Reply #74 |
79. Everyone's grabbing torches and pitchforks to storm the wrong castle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
41. No, because the wrong people will be helped, like "flippers" .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
48. Only people who were demonstrably defrauded deserve to be bailed out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squatch
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:33 AM Response to Reply #48 |
54. Bailed out by the LENDER, only after having proven deceit in a court of law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #48 |
84. Agreed slackmaster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tektonik
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
51. I can't vote in this poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CountAllVotes
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:42 AM Response to Reply #51 |
60. you are absolutely right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beerboy
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
62. Yeah, I can't get a loan, so it feels nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
64. This bail out idea seems to me to be a way to bail out the lenders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
66. I am curious about which housing loans we are talking about being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
70. Lending countryslide $51.1 billion from a government sponsored program is a bailout. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CountAllVotes
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. damn WELFARE KINGS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
80. Why should non-home owning tax payers bail out homeowners? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #80 |
89. Why should healthy people pay rates to subsidise the elderly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 02:22 AM Response to Reply #89 |
90. Your analogy is off. Having people who can't afford homes pay for a bailout... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
83. If the government can bail out industries & cities (NYC) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
87. Yes! Gov't help. JUST LIKE CORPORATIONS GET!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
88. Yes, because it is predatory lending practices that has caused this mess... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC