|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:34 PM Original message |
Why did CHAVEZ's "graciousness" get bleeped on Univision 2 days later? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. Oh, I know, because Univision is a CIA/DLC/NeoCon/NYT/AP *front*!1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Responding to your own OP is embarassingly bad form. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
48. It's called an "addendum." As opposed to a personal insult. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:16 AM Response to Reply #48 |
60. No, when you do it with 57 minutes left in the EDIT window, it's called a "shameless self-kick". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:20 AM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Why does this thread need a self-kick? Another slur instead of content. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #64 |
69. You tell me- you're the one who self-kicked it. That's not a "slur", it's just what happened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:34 AM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Why does RESPONDING to you mean a SELF-kick?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. I know, why not start a flame war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Me only, or Huguito's supporters?! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Why is it crap exactly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Deleted message |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Is Joe Conason a glorified blogger then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. So Conason wrote this piece? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:59 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Some Anonymous Blogger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. WTF ..... Conason didn't write it did he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:17 PM Response to Reply #20 |
34. Could his name be Paila Master? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #34 |
78. LMFAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 02:13 AM Response to Reply #20 |
77. Actually that appears to be the American translation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
30. Sorry, hadn't read it yet, but you didn't say Salon's blog, you said Salon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Thank you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. I, the o.p., am HERE, who're you talking to in the 3rd person?!1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:59 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Your repeated use of "!1" explains everything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. It explains I'm a DUer who plays with the jokes here (!1, hugh) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Deleted message |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. Have I called YOU "a slanderous fool"?! Did you read the o.p. about TODAY's Huguito's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:14 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. ........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Typo?!1 Or grammatically challenged?!1 (your vs you're) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:23 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. bla bla bla bla bla bla bla .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:34 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. I looked away for a moment. Were you the one who got deleted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #41 |
49. Self Delete ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:50 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Who's clouding what?!1 My o.p. was about Univision & the links were background. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:54 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Um...... that original response wasn't about your o.p. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #53 |
62. You can cry "peace, peace" but it ain't there. Look inside/know thyself. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 01:05 AM Response to Reply #62 |
74. Why do you fester in anger my son? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 01:20 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. Oommmm, Oooommmm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:13 AM Response to Reply #49 |
58. No, I depend on the kindness of DUers to feed the cube rats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:42 AM Response to Reply #58 |
72. Then again it's as simple as .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:58 AM Response to Reply #72 |
73. I didn't say I highly respect cub rats. I'M the cube rat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 01:29 AM Response to Reply #73 |
76. Awwwww but trying to give this anonymous blogger credibility .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:18 PM Response to Reply #16 |
35. Or it is at least valid to suggest that he might not have. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. Trying Again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Of course, NOTHING is "highly biased" except any criticism of Huguito |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Look, I have NO idea what blog is what. I went by the brand name "Salon" which is one of OURS/mine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Look, I have NO idea what blog is what. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
33. Look at YOUR posts and MINE. I *never* attack you personally. You DO. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:25 PM Response to Reply #12 |
38. I am, but are you?!1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. In This Particular Case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
40. Note to you: Quotation marks are used for QUOTATIONS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:43 PM Response to Reply #15 |
46. While the other side threw out "Salon is a glorified blog" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
44. Perhaps anyone can start a Salon blog. But do they all have webblog awards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. So post a hightly biased pro-Chavez account |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
39. Like Warren said.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:35 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. We're all OPINIONS, but Huguito's supporters DETEST opposing OPINIONS!1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:43 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. And you're hysterical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:53 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Excuse me?! Now THAT was a real sucker punch. I thought we were agreeing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:03 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. I am a Chavez supporter, UTUSN.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:10 AM Response to Reply #54 |
57. HaHAH!1 I'm sorry you will hide my thread (not-s-esses, I hope). Because I have fondness for you on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:20 AM Response to Reply #57 |
65. Okay..we'll agree to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:25 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. I love you, love you, love you ... (ad infinitum) G'night!1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:34 AM Response to Reply #67 |
70. You're funny.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #39 |
59. Anyone around here won that particular blog award? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
10. Who? Some petro state head |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StClone
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
17. Evil Hugo is a poor dictator, can't even steal 1st base |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:00 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Biding his time. Biding his time. (Reference, Will & Grace), |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. And there it is again. You guys have all the prescience of Bush et al. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
43. No, he just DECLARES what he wants. & "you guys" are in deep denial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #25 |
68. I personally didn't think he was a dictator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StClone
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Too much TeeVee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. I would take that one step further actually.. He is probably the most awesome ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
45. "too" not "to". Oh, and he WILL be back. Biding his time. Biding his time. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. Yep I see the annoying part! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:04 AM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Pointing out all the personal attacks. Why do you want to engage somebody "annoying"?!1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:18 AM Response to Reply #24 |
63. We're only seven years into the 21st Century |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706
![]() |
Wed Dec-05-07 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
27. I sure wish we had a Dictator like Hugo running this country! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:05 AM Response to Reply #27 |
56. So does Shrub -- namely, himSELF!1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:21 AM Response to Reply #56 |
66. Deleted message |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #27 |
61. You do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
79. ZOMG! CHAVEZ!!!1!!!ONE ONE ELEVENTY-ONE!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC