|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
kpete
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:11 PM Original message |
Congress 'guilty of not impeaching Bush' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. excited to give the first of many recs for this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wizard777
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. Pelosi's comment is a confession to obstruction of justice. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:22 AM Response to Reply #2 |
21. You mean the "off the table" comments? or has she said something more recently? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insanad
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 11:26 AM Response to Reply #21 |
43. Can someone get Pelosi and Reed some Viagra ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alberg
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 10:50 AM Response to Reply #2 |
32. Send the DLC a message they can't ignore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 10:52 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. you seem to be confusing the DNC with the DLC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notanotherday
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #32 |
49. The DLC democrats would screw up impeachment anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosesaylavee
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
3. A BIG KICK AND REC for this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. Not impeaching is not a crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Aiding and abetting a criminal act is a crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebenaube
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. actually that's exactly how it will go down with the ICC.... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. You think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wizard777
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. The good old 2x4! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. WRONG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:56 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. It is not as simple as you are trying to make it either. Why don't you go for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 12:34 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. It is simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:33 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Yes, it's the Republican's war being actively enabled by Dems faigned impotence. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
52. Not surprising to me who is in your avatar. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #12 |
40. How many times does this have to be explained to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 05:29 PM Response to Reply #40 |
65. Because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 11:32 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. Don't tell me the oath has no legal force... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thothmes
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:57 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. Read your Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PufPuf23
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:10 PM Response to Reply #65 |
75. Why don't you want Bush and Cheney removed from office? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:27 AM Response to Reply #4 |
22. She's flatly refusing to perform her sworn duty to protect America from criminals in WH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 10:36 AM Response to Reply #22 |
30. Was Congress obligated to impeach Truman? FDR? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. k&r+ some useful Congressional phone numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
11. Seems like we are way ahead of the curve on this. It's about time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
13. Oh this is near and dear to my heart. Kick and Recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
15. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito
![]() |
Thu Dec-06-07 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
16. 22 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
18. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 02:11 AM Response to Original message |
19. k + r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 02:31 AM Response to Original message |
20. HELL YES! Recommended! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
24. Indeed it does... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 07:54 AM Response to Original message |
25. Yea! If attacking our own leaders doesn't work...attack them some more. That'll work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 01:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
55. Wow. That make absolutely no sense at all. Not one bit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
26. "To leave unchallenged..." All By Design! Not "cowards," but COMPLICITOUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
27. They should all be held accountable! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thothmes
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 09:16 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Congressional accountability |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pberq
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
29. Good find, kpete - K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
31. Who the f*ck is Niranjan Ramakrishnan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #31 |
37. hang it up, onenote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Not Utterly Nonsense, cali |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #39 |
44. Does locking up American citizens in relocation centers cross that line? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 11:48 AM Response to Reply #37 |
46. They may not be in technical, material violation of their Oaths, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. I understand that. I sympathize with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Well you're right of course; we have a better chance of changing pelosi's mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. nothing like a slime attack from, well, you know.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 01:51 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. suit yourself. I didn't intend it as an attack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 01:59 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. whatever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 02:17 PM Response to Reply #37 |
58. Have you even read the oath of office? Do you even know what it says? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
33. that's how the thugs will frame it next year.....and they will be right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
35. As they should, by not enforcing the rule of law they themselves become |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
36. Yeah, if we still had law and a constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #36 |
42. A most valid, crucial point that is strangely overlooked... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peggy Day
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
38. I called Pelosi's office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
41. agree and will forward to all and the congresscritters!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
45. BUT THEY DON'T HAVE THE VOOOOOOTES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. And, they don't have the BACKBOOOOOOOOOONES!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #45 |
54. True. The DLC/traitor congressmen will vote to protect Bush, like usual. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
53. Not gonna happen. The DLC tratiors will fight this harder than they ever DREAMED of fighting Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #53 |
59. I wonder which of the leading Dems will pledge to investigage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 02:34 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. "we" wont have the votes. "We" meaning DLC & bluedog traitors, of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
61. Has HR 333 pretty much dried up and blown away? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
focusfan
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
62. i agree he should be impeached but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mme. Defarge
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
63. WILL NO ONE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sss1977
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
64. Like it or not everyone, the Democratic Congress is now just as guilty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
66. fascinating that this renowned "political analyst", |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
67. Kicked and recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllyCat
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
68. I agree wholeheartedly. I'm so sick of this refusal to get this guy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
69. DERELICTION OF DUTY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
70. Dennis Kucinich got impeachment right the first time-kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
72. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
73. Impeach the sumbitches. NOW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC