|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:17 PM Original message |
How many would like to see the Wealthy TAXED to extinction? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UndertheOcean
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. How about starting by prohibiting inheritance . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 11:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
80. I've been working at my family's business for 45 years. Grandparents started it, my father then me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:32 AM Response to Reply #80 |
92. You should have been buying the business over the years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:50 AM Response to Reply #92 |
116. I should have been BUYING THE BUSINESS? With what fucking money? You've obviously never owned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #116 |
128. How much is your parents' estate worth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 03:12 PM Response to Reply #128 |
132. Real Estate value is about twice what you posted, because we're in a resort area. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #132 |
137. I think the current rate is like 47% on every dollar above that. So... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #137 |
142. We have no significant cash flow. We pay the bills and get a roof over our head. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 10:24 PM Response to Reply #142 |
168. I'm hard pressed to find an example of a family farm ruined by the estate tax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:05 AM Response to Reply #168 |
171. As you point out, there are solutions here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:14 AM Response to Reply #168 |
178. Family farm? Estate tax? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:02 AM Response to Reply #142 |
170. You need to talk to a business manager/tax consultant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 05:58 PM Response to Reply #80 |
158. Your parents should have life insurance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:16 AM Response to Reply #1 |
89. Or even bringing the estate tax back down to a reasonable level? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 06:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
164. What would be the incentive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
2. My interest is not taking wealth. My interest is in a collective economy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. Same Tax Rate As We Had When Eisenhower Was President, And... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
44. Exactly, Thomas Jeffferson wrote about the balance brought by Progressive taxation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
4. Not me. I'd like to simply see all citizens taxed fairly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. I'm sure the Bush and Cheney families agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. I think it has been longer than thirty years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. And did the income gap divide grow more in the last thirty years, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:57 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. It did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
26. They actually pay less in taxes than a janitor, teacher, police officer, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:35 AM Response to Reply #4 |
94. Do you think that capital gains should be taxed at the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 06:43 AM Response to Reply #94 |
113. When did capital gains cease to be considered "income" for taxation purposes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 06:28 PM Response to Reply #113 |
163. Bush Tax Cuts, of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 08:18 AM Response to Reply #94 |
183. Absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
panader0
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
5. Hey, I'm a hardworking poor gu with three teenagers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:11 AM Response to Reply #5 |
88. And the 'cheap labor' crowd goes.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. not me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. That is why I proposed a "correction" to the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
58. You proposed "extinction," which sounds permanent to me. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 10:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
71. Would you please define that "very important roll in society"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dorian Gray
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 02:16 AM Response to Reply #71 |
110. Well, there's always that elusive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
8. I doubt eliminating wealth would eliminate poverty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I think it would. Think of it, what the wealthy have, the poor don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
10. IMO society advances on the shoulders of brilliant, creative scientists and engineers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
72. The brilliant and creative of any profession do what they do because it is what they are compelled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 11:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
81. I've been a software engineer for well over 20 years now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 11:59 PM Response to Reply #81 |
86. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
11. OK, we've followed your plan. Now a group of only 535 people control 1/3 the wealth in America... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
24. Are you going to respond? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:57 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Your plan presuming that our elected representatives did NOT actually represent us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. You just assume out of nowhere that people who run for Congress aren't corrupt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
12. I am not in favor of torture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michaz
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
14. This sounds like whining! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:47 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Hmm.... Kind of like, 'Tax me more because I'm wealthy is wrong' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michaz
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. Grow up! Some people actually worked their butts off to get where they are now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:47 AM Response to Reply #30 |
95. Some people work their butts off and aren't wealthy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michaz
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 06:25 AM Response to Reply #95 |
112. Some do! But not all. That is how it is, there is always going to be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
15. Taxes should be enough to maintain the basic economic agreement between each individual and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
16. What a ridiculous concept and a poor choice of words.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. So super tax cuts for the rich is a very good thing in your book. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:47 PM Response to Reply #18 |
54. Did you even read my post, can you read? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:54 PM Response to Reply #18 |
61. That's not what the poster said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:18 PM Response to Reply #16 |
36. Quisling! They need to be taxed to the end of their undue political influence. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
39. I find this acceptance of notions of "class" to be disturbing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 10:15 PM Response to Reply #39 |
67. That is because you have been completely brainwashed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #67 |
73. that was my point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftist_not_liberal
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #73 |
122. yes please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:27 AM Response to Reply #39 |
91. You're obviously a newbie. You don't come to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 06:46 AM Response to Reply #39 |
114. It SHOULD be disturbing. The vast majority of Americans have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftist_not_liberal
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #16 |
121. There is no such thing as a "middle class" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
152. Without the middle class, the wealthy will prosper even more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
17. My inner Social Darwin wants to retaliate against your class warfare. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Thanks for reading the entire post. NOT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:20 PM Response to Reply #17 |
37. get a clue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
22. How many cast in a "cookie cutter" mold get wealthy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 08:54 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Whining Republicans got tax cuts for the wealthy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 01:13 AM Response to Reply #22 |
100. Some creative, hard-working people become wealthy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doremus
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #100 |
125. Your mention of Bill Gates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:12 AM Response to Reply #125 |
172. One of the interesting things about early America is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snarkoleptic
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
29. I'd rather see the table not so heavily titled in favor of the rich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:11 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. I think this strikes directly at the heart of the matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 05:02 PM Response to Reply #29 |
147. This is the crux of the argument... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
32. I just want them taxed to "Oh! So *this* is what it's like!!!!" NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BearSquirrel2
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
34. Hard days work for a good days pay ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brazos121200
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
35. In a capitalist society such as ours there will always be rich and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:28 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. it doesn't have to be this way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brazos121200
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:39 PM Response to Reply #41 |
49. Not possible as long as the corporations control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:50 PM Response to Reply #41 |
55. So basically become a communist nation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #55 |
74. I think I'd be better off if I could, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 11:54 PM Response to Reply #74 |
82. Honestly, as a liberal democrat, I'm gonna tell you to spend less time on your computer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 01:25 AM Response to Reply #82 |
104. Freeper! Neo-con stooge! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:40 AM Response to Reply #82 |
174. Yeah, education and hard work are really paying off in Tanzania and Iraq and New Orleans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:54 PM Response to Reply #41 |
62. Capitalism is really not anything more than the concept of private capital. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #62 |
75. I know that that's how it's supposed to work in theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:53 AM Response to Reply #62 |
96. Walmart is more efficient than small stores |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #96 |
130. Pretty efficient when they're making suppliers use Chinese labor to the tune of 60 cents/hour. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #130 |
135. You are right, I mean, right on the money! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #96 |
134. Wal-Mart in a sense is more efficient, but only because of practical slavery. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 01:36 AM Response to Reply #62 |
105. Actually, the best economic system incorporates elements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:57 PM Response to Reply #41 |
63. We should chuck it and replace it with what? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 11:22 PM Response to Reply #63 |
76. kittens? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 01:17 AM Response to Reply #41 |
102. Chuck it and replace it with what? How? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
38. Warren Buffet and Bill Gates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:29 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. but how did they get that money? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:40 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. Warren Buffett invested well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 11:25 PM Response to Reply #50 |
78. I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
I work for workers
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 01:52 AM Response to Reply #78 |
106. Just cause it's my pet peve, Microsoft WON its antitrust case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
40. Just tax them like we did under Eisenhower. Adjust the Estate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
42. not to extinction, actually... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redstone
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
45. Balls. I'd bet EVERY CENT I HAVE that if you, yes YOU invented something that sold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blonndee
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:34 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. And that is the Alger myth, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:50 PM Response to Reply #45 |
56. I know I wouldn't change my mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 10:01 PM Response to Reply #56 |
64. The top 1% only controls 1/3 of the wealth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:03 AM Response to Reply #45 |
87. Bill Gates invented something... ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:41 AM Response to Reply #87 |
176. Bill Gates was a prep school businessman. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #45 |
131. If I won the lottery, I'd say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #45 |
139. Most people would. I remember once writing out a check for $37,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
galileo3000
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
46. Not me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
48. YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
51. works for me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
52. No. I'd like fair pay and benefits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brazos121200
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
53. High tax rates for the rich never seems to work. There always |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
57. I'd be happy to see a return to the FIT policies and rates of 1976. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
59. I want them to pay their share and thats alot more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
60. Uh, no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
65. Extinction? No, but certainly there should be a hefty increase in taxes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Balbus
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
66. Jealousy is an ugly face... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NI4NI
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
68. not really, but off shore tax loopholes may need attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
69. Before or after we behead them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzybeans
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
70. I wouldn't, rather I'd like to see every person within our borders receive the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mutineer
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
77. I'm not a communist or a socialist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 11:57 PM Response to Reply #77 |
83. EXACTLY!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiley50
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
79. I'd much rather see them lined up against a brick wall and shot n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 11:59 PM Response to Reply #79 |
85. Ya, like the Jews during WWII, lets just exterminate, nt..... not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
84. Raised hand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spacelady
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
90. How about taking the upper cap off Social Security? They must |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancer78
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 02:11 AM Response to Reply #90 |
107. Yeah, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spacelady
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #107 |
151. I wonder if ultra wealthy people would be willing to waive their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
93. Extinction? I'd rather we just tax them until we can provide health care and education. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tuesday Afternoon
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
97. Nawh,,,Just enough to put them on the endangered species list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 01:01 AM Response to Original message |
98. Have you forgotten who calls the shots? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 01:07 AM Response to Original message |
99. I don't want to tax the rich to get even with them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
101. Not at all. I think this is one of the more obtuse ideas I've seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeroysphitz
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 01:17 AM Response to Original message |
103. I don't know about extinction but how about taxed FAIRLY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dorian Gray
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 02:13 AM Response to Original message |
108. Nope... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancer78
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 02:15 AM Response to Original message |
109. I think that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeneCosta
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 05:26 AM Response to Original message |
111. No one should be a billionaire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #111 |
126. And others are employed because of Bill Gates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 06:52 AM Response to Original message |
115. nope. just raise taxes on them so that they again pay their fair share. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
117. UPDATE: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #117 |
138. With the system as it is, only the mega wealthy can wage class warfare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
118. There's nothing wrong with being rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
119. But...but...but...we're all going to be rich someday! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
120. how about having them pay their fair share? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
123. The problem with taxing the wealthy punitively is demonstrated by the AMT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
124. Now that would be a dream come true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainer
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
127. And communism worked REALLY well, didn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
129. Not extinction. Tax them their fair share though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
133. How about they just pay the same tax percentage as middle class folks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
136. No thanks. I have wealthy friends who worked their asses off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #136 |
141. Correcting a 'broken system' is the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorro
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #141 |
144. The system isn't broken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanctified
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #141 |
145. How is stealing from someone fixing a broken system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 05:12 PM Response to Reply #145 |
148. For what it's worth... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libodem
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
140. I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
143. How about the wealthy just paying their fair share? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
146. A wealth tax as a recovery mechanism for all the benefits large businesses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
149. i hope you're never rich...everyone should pay their fair share |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
150. The uber-wealthy, yes. It's simply not healthy for a democracy to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike03
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
153. Wow. I have some questions for you: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
154. ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piedmont
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
155. Not me-- I like capitalism and LIBERTY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 06:39 PM Response to Reply #155 |
166. Too much wealth in the hands of too few destroys liberty and freedom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:42 AM Response to Reply #155 |
177. So you believe in keeping people penalized for having "bad fortune"? /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piedmont
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #177 |
192. If I believed that, I would have said it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stirlingsliver
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
156. Arrogant, Greedy, Sneaky People |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorro
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 06:22 PM Response to Reply #156 |
160. For someone who isn't rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:17 AM Response to Reply #156 |
173. I guess the Kennedy's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lurking Dem
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:11 AM Response to Reply #156 |
188. Tax them until |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
157. what is your definition of "wealthy"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
159. Have a single-bracket income tax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
161. They should be taxed fairly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
162. Not to extinction. That's bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #162 |
167. Agreed. Not to extinction... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
165. NO...one of the most ridiculous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
169. Check, I'm for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:41 AM Response to Original message |
175. It's implausible in our system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
179. No, I'd like to see the poor eliminated, not the rich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conspirator
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:28 AM Response to Reply #179 |
191. BEST REPLY nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
180. 110% over 750 k--150% over 1.5m |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainer
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:53 AM Response to Reply #180 |
186. Y'know what? I'd stop working. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 10:02 AM Response to Reply #186 |
187. i know i was sort of joking--it would be nice to balance the budget with help from the super rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
181. No. Just tax it enough to make it less hereditary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeeDeeNY
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 08:01 AM Response to Original message |
182. If the wealthy just paid their fair share, everyone would be better off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
184. Where would you get the revenue make up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blindpig
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
185. Good luck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stimbox
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
189. Error: you can only recommend threads which were started in the past 24 hours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
190. Not to extinction or even bankrupcy, just to the level of their responsibility... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC