|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Javaman
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:02 PM Original message |
So now we know that pelosi was playing with us all along... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zabet
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. They must think we are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
26. BULLSHIT ALERT! This is a propaganda piece at best, or a cover up of BUSH crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:42 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Obviously, Pelosi and the Dems are behind all this RIGHT!! Yeah, when monkeys fly, when monkeys fl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:32 AM Response to Reply #30 |
61. Not seeing the forest for the damn little schrub, that's what this is all about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:23 AM Response to Reply #61 |
82. Her silence is deafening. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:34 PM Response to Reply #61 |
104. Before you bash those of us "Democratic bashers" perhaps you should read a little history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:39 PM Response to Reply #104 |
167. Thanks :) I bow to the better writter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
colbertforpresident
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #61 |
190. Lip Service |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #30 |
126. No! This was made very clear in previous hearings on top secret fyi sessions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razors edge
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #126 |
143. They could have gone to the press with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #143 |
148. At the time it was presented, it was a hypothetical. Played the same way Bush plays it today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razors edge
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #148 |
191. Who in their right mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spiffarino
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 07:35 PM Response to Reply #191 |
220. Keep in mind this was 2002 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
colbertforpresident
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #143 |
192. enable or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 06:52 PM Response to Reply #143 |
218. And the press would have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokercat999
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:02 AM Response to Reply #143 |
246. There is a solution...term limits, one term in ANY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razors edge
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 09:28 AM Response to Reply #246 |
247. I like the sound of that. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #246 |
249. I totally agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokercat999
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 07:12 AM Response to Reply #249 |
254. What's so disheartening is that you're right about the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enough already
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:39 PM Response to Reply #126 |
232. Don't bore me with secrecy oaths |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 09:24 AM Response to Reply #126 |
255. They could have... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:53 PM Original message |
They're complicit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
236. Sadly...it seems the evidence mounts...high level Dems on Commitees who were briefed "Approved" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:54 AM Response to Reply #26 |
84. typical-try to create an us vs. them dynamic to perpetuate the lie-kind of funy in a sad way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #26 |
111. Perhaps you are right on the being lied to and the smoke and mirrors, the question though is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:49 PM Response to Reply #111 |
115. self delete wrong place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:30 PM Response to Reply #26 |
125. Excellent post! It's time DU got a fucking grip!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #26 |
138. so knowing about it and being silent is okay. when the repugs do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:20 PM Response to Reply #26 |
151. Does it not bother you in the least |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aggiesal
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:07 PM Response to Reply #26 |
181. There is some truth to your BS alert, but ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. It's quite the betrayal, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. It helps if you never expected anything any different from Pelosi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
96. You're right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
specimenfred1984
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #96 |
215. SUCKERS got taken again! Chimp's torture policy is all Pelosi's fault! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #215 |
231. yet another lock step dem who finds it impossible to question the democratic leaders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:02 AM Response to Reply #2 |
69. This is absolute absurdity. Pelosi is not a "facist, torture-loving cretin" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:55 PM Response to Reply #69 |
107. People are pissed - Dems are pissed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. right now they are busy refunding the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
4. it looks to me tonight that the definition of a progressive... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Oh so you are okay with her silence on water-boarding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. What was she supposed to do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Neither can I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. And that was just all the more reason to keep speaking up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. One year after 9/11. Bush has skyrocketing approvals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. And she has been going gang busters as majority leader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:51 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. We're not talking about what she has done as Madame Speaker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:03 AM Response to Reply #40 |
70. it is the Republicans who are obstructionist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:17 AM Response to Reply #70 |
79. Sure they are obstructionists, but lets face the facts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #79 |
196. BUT!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #196 |
199. Oh come on. You are seriously suggesting that we don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #199 |
204. you pressure individual GOP members of Congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #204 |
206. I have no choice, I live in texas. I have a stack of return form letters from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 06:05 PM Response to Reply #206 |
214. BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:34 PM Response to Reply #214 |
230. ah what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:45 PM Response to Reply #230 |
233. now you're telling me to leave DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:43 AM Response to Reply #233 |
243. No, I'm just saying go peddle your self righteousness with someone else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:27 AM Response to Reply #243 |
244. well, the time you spent jawboning this on DU... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #244 |
248. dupe nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:43 AM Response to Reply #244 |
250. And so could have you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gtar100
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 10:43 PM Response to Reply #70 |
240. It's not forgotten. I think everyone is well aware of republican BS ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:59 AM Response to Reply #40 |
85. yea but alot of her legislation is bull shit that has no chnce of final passage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TriMetFan
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 10:48 AM Response to Reply #40 |
91. As Madame Speaker....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #91 |
103. Exactly and since her main job is to protect the constitution... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. There is a large contingent of us who never gave up our principles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:49 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Thank you! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:02 AM Response to Reply #35 |
51. You aren't alone, for sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:06 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. I largely agree with you, Jack. But, that's what "leader" means, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:25 AM Response to Reply #52 |
56. I'm glad we've found a common ground. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:33 AM Response to Reply #56 |
62. Imho, the way that the LGBT community is being treated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
135. Yeah, that's true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:31 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Chew gum and walk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:31 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Yeah, couldn't do anything...integrity is only for suckers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. she could have gone public to attack Bush's push for torture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
39. Democrats were in the minority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #39 |
162. "She protested to the administration in 2003." -- WRONG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
42. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:22 AM Response to Reply #42 |
73. she didn't have to reveal the content of the meeting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
29. You bring up very important points. She was not speaker, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:44 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. She was silent then and she is silent now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:53 PM Response to Reply #32 |
44. If you can't see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:23 AM Response to Reply #44 |
83. If there is blame to be spread then why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #44 |
105. And if she was so against it but couldn't do anything then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
panzerfaust
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #44 |
176. "You people are sick". Damn Right We Are! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
colbertforpresident
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #29 |
193. Crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:13 AM Response to Reply #10 |
54. I can't believe you're ignoring the facts. They're out there, beyond the wapo story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:49 AM Response to Reply #10 |
77. If "the laws" do not allow congressment to go public when the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:05 AM Response to Reply #10 |
92. She could have done what Jane Harman did and filed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #10 |
108. Divide and conquer n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lazer47
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
109. Bull Sh** You cannot make crimes classified, that is bull shit,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
121. She can take the "strict security rtules" and shove them is what she can do first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stlsaxman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:03 PM Response to Reply #10 |
227. agreed, MonkeyFunk, WaPo bullshit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. I am NOT okay... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
colbertforpresident
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #15 |
198. Start a fire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. "Too quick to judge" is the correct analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Yeah, eventually. It's always great to close the door after the horse is gone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:01 AM Response to Reply #22 |
50. Where have we heard that before? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:19 AM Response to Reply #50 |
80. Also from hillary and edwards. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #50 |
114. Yeah, because the bill he was talking about was changed. He should have said that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:18 AM Response to Reply #16 |
55. Sworn to secrecy about illegal torture? That's your defense? Good Christ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:05 AM Response to Reply #7 |
71. Where are you getting your info from, Bush himself? Porter Goss? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #71 |
161. So you haven't read the WP story, I assume? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:34 PM Response to Reply #7 |
127. Straight from hysterical extrapolation to condemnation of those who don't agree. Nicely played! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. And I guess the definition of rational is to keep making excuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:35 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. you know, Dems can do more than two things at once |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:38 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Oh yeah, I forgot. the world changed completely after 9/11... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:43 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. calm down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:48 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Awww, I'm sorry I hurt your feelings... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:54 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. you didn't hurt my feelings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:22 AM Response to Reply #45 |
81. have fun with that. I will not sit idly by while our country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
colbertforpresident
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #45 |
200. It's not just this issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:49 PM Response to Reply #200 |
202. yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #23 |
34. I don't need to wise up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:00 AM Response to Reply #34 |
49. Read more, scream less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #49 |
58. Apparently you missed it then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:25 AM Response to Reply #34 |
57. I would extend to you the right you deny them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:29 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. On the contrary, I fully support their right to defend themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:00 AM Response to Reply #59 |
68. You do know that your opinion has no bearing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:50 AM Response to Reply #68 |
74. You're absolutely right, it has nothing to do with my opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:03 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. well, you are talking about two things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:06 AM Response to Reply #75 |
76. When did I allude to a call for ignoring the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #76 |
106. Thanks for your previous post, very well said. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
46. I hate to publucly agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:09 AM Response to Reply #4 |
53. I think I have enough information to make an intelligent assessment of the situation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
6. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
9. I watched a documentary on torture tonight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 08:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
226. perhaps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
11. And we think Congress can be trusted to fund our healthcare? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:29 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. And you shoot the idea down every chance you get. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. healthcare reform is nothing but crap being passed off as chocolate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bryan Buchan
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
13. It is called the DCCC... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
21. Pelosi has long advocated unconditional support for Israel, and human rights groups |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClayZ
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
25. It just keeps getting more shameful! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
37. Dem leaders in Congress will sell us out on health care reform, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #37 |
118. yes, i fear they will also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
41. What is this worldview of perfection? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:56 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. nice post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:58 PM Response to Reply #41 |
48. "My government tortures people, my government is imperfect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:31 AM Response to Reply #48 |
60. it's not wrong to complain or fight against injustices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:47 AM Response to Reply #60 |
64. I agree with you that being reactive, just tearing politicians down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:29 PM Response to Reply #64 |
102. Okay, I gotcha now. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #60 |
113. Counterpunch are dickheads indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:33 AM Response to Reply #41 |
63. Now you're equating torture with being imperfect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:58 AM Response to Reply #63 |
66. At least I don't smoke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:53 AM Response to Reply #41 |
65. Who's asking for perfection? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spag68
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
43. I have to add my two cents worth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #43 |
95. I've written pelosi before and have again with this issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
67. like a poster upthread said - "hook, line , and sinker" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #67 |
94. Deleted message |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:51 PM Response to Reply #67 |
133. Yeah it is an anachary symbol because like a good american, I question everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #133 |
159. you took the WaPo article at face value... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #159 |
169. Perhaps that is my real crime. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
72. What CRAP! "dems are not dems at all" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:50 AM Response to Reply #72 |
93. Deleted message |
Lochloosa
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 07:18 AM Response to Original message |
78. BULLSHIT! AS A MEMBER OF THE GANG OF EIGHT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 10:02 AM Response to Reply #78 |
86. The Gang of Eight is exactly that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #78 |
89. fine whatever, as long she keeps silient on violations of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lochloosa
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #89 |
98. You don't understand what I'm saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:27 PM Response to Reply #98 |
101. So no one is supposed to know that she was silent on the issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lazer47
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:19 PM Response to Reply #98 |
110. Bullshit,,,you cannot classifiy or make secret,,crimes within the Gov. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 10:29 PM Response to Reply #78 |
238. It was her DUTY to reveal what she knew. Secrecy is what BushCo does...and Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
87. Don't think we know enough yet about the facts of the matter to come to any intelligent conclusions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
88. The closer Dems get to the center the easier it is for them to cross over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
90. "who else in congress knew"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salib
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
97. Time to redouble our efforts to Take Back Our Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyskye
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
99. Waterboarding "description" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
100. Well Said and To The Point! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
112. Nancy Pelosi cares only about keeping Nancy Pelosi in power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
116. We've all been betrayed. Let us join hands and jump into the river. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #116 |
139. Nice solution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #139 |
224. I totally support what you did with this thread --- and I think those objecting are few -- ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
117. at this point we ONLY have the cia claim--no official rebuttal as to what this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #117 |
207. That is right...and the administration did the same thing with another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
119. Anyone and I mean anyone who voted to allow this ignorant fool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
120. Every fucking one of them should be arrested for being an accomplice after the fact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
122. TOTAL PROPAGANDA AND BULLSHIT. You wish you knew Jack (Kennedy) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #122 |
158. So if I'm so wrong please provide me with proof to the contrary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 06:01 PM Response to Reply #122 |
213. standing ovation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stlsaxman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:25 PM Response to Reply #122 |
229. Hear Hear!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
123. Pelosi was subject to "stict rules of secrecy" according to the WA PO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #123 |
141. So, what's stopping her now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:09 PM Response to Reply #141 |
242. Where did I suggest such a thing, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:57 AM Response to Reply #242 |
245. Impeach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #245 |
253. I want them both impeached |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 10:22 PM Response to Reply #123 |
237. Rockefeller on the Sunday Pundit shows said "I Can't talk about any of it because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:01 PM Response to Reply #237 |
241. Believable to whom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
groovedaddy
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
124. Does this mean that KKKarl Rove was right and the war in Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #124 |
160. Hmmm, I don't know where the hell you pulled that from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
128. Jesus effin' Cristo. Time to call for the rubber truck. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:40 PM Response to Reply #128 |
129. Time to admit what percentage of posters are actually freeper trolling worms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:57 PM Response to Reply #129 |
137. The extreme reactions from left and right sometimes collide on the far side of the universe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #137 |
149. Thank you but I can defend myself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:20 PM Response to Reply #149 |
150. Are you running out of breath yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:24 PM Response to Reply #150 |
154. Sounds like you were to me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #154 |
157. LOL! So, your intent is simply to argue about everything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #157 |
164. sigh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #164 |
235. so with all this noble "questioning" that you claim to do.. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #235 |
251. Good god. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:11 PM Response to Reply #129 |
145. Some facts are more easily faced than others, it seems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:07 PM Response to Reply #145 |
182. "Duly noted." What exactly are you going to do with this "notation"? Put in my file? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 05:12 PM Response to Reply #182 |
209. Not likely, since I wasn't TALKING to you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #129 |
152. it's easy for you to cast stones when you are blocked... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:53 PM Response to Reply #128 |
134. right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #134 |
136. Questioning her motives, my butt. You've condemned her and accused her of treason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #136 |
140. And, if your parents are abusive, talk to the authorities. Misdirected anger is wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #136 |
142. I have said nothing of treason, please don't put words in my mouth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #142 |
146. Didn't accuse her of treason? I guess you just described it without using the word. My bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #146 |
156. Then provide proof of the contrary. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #156 |
184. Provide proof that she didn't commit treason? Or that she isn't guilty of "bullshit"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #184 |
189. Oh good god. give it a rest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #128 |
173. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scytherius
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
130. We must let her know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notanotherday
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
131. Pelosi " I was too stupid to know water boarding was torture' duh.. duh.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
132. The little gem is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #132 |
144. "acknowledged that Pelosi did not raise objections at the time." nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #144 |
172. What does that mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #172 |
174. Here's the full quote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:02 PM Response to Reply #174 |
177. How disgusting is that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:05 PM Response to Reply #174 |
178. I read it, that's why I wrote in the thread linked to that it's BS! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:07 PM Response to Reply #178 |
180. And you know that how? please provide me with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
147. The rot within is DLC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
153. there are a lot of people here at du who think this article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #153 |
155. If true, I will be the first to apologize, but until that point.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #155 |
165. i too am wondering where her statement is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #165 |
170. Thanks for the support. :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
163. Nothing has changed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:37 PM Response to Reply #163 |
166. Eloquently put. :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:06 PM Response to Reply #166 |
179. Word too big? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #179 |
183. How old are you? I forgot to use spell check, good lord. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
168. K*R You ask: "who else in congress knew about this water-boarding?? " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #168 |
171. Thanks :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #168 |
185. Do not delude yourself into thinking anyone in Congress reads DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:12 PM Response to Reply #185 |
186. I have it on good authority that most Dems in Congress read the DUzy Awards faithfully. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #186 |
188. Nice to know they take us, the frustrated few, so seriously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #185 |
187. Why should it matter whether or not congress people read this site? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #185 |
194. what`s why they hire a staff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
debunkthelies
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
175. welcome to the light |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaryRN
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
195. Well done, Javaman. You can watch my back anytime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #195 |
197. Thanks. :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
datavg
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
201. But Even... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #201 |
203. Heck, I know that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
datavg
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 06:41 PM Response to Reply #203 |
217. Sorry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
205. now do we know why impeachment was off the fucking table? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
208. Here's a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:03 PM Response to Reply #208 |
256. Never asked her to step down... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
210. Regardless of whether or not the article represents the truth, what is clear is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #210 |
252. Well said. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
211. K&R. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
212. I am so pissed, K&R this: Bad enough you get lied to & shafted by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roxnev
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
216. If it wasn't a Republican Rag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
219. Hey, Don't Count Me IN With This Bunch & I Don't Think I'm Even A Progressive! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
221. Yeah, now we know! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
222. Yeah, lets get rid of her and put us a Repuke in there., |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaryRN
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 07:53 PM Response to Reply #222 |
223. Ya, How about Lieberman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
225. From the day Pelosi made her unilateral declaration that 'Impeachment is off the table," I've been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
228. You know I find DU entertaining |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockybelt
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
234. Who are the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
239. Video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC