|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 03:45 AM Original message |
"Nancy Pelosi Is An Accomplice" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 03:55 AM Response to Original message |
1. more turley quotes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sce56 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 08:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
103. Now you have to understand Harmon is the keeper of the Aerospace defense contractor dist in congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 08:53 PM Response to Reply #103 |
108. That's pretty telling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 03:56 AM Response to Original message |
2. R&K |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lint Head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:03 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Great post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 02:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
54. yet there are people on this board who still defend pelosi. may she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Far easier to hate Pelosi than it is to find 16 republican Senators who'll vote to convict |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:55 PM Response to Reply #55 |
96. And if Pelosi would put impeachment BACK on the table and let the investigations happen, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 07:51 AM Response to Reply #96 |
177. The American people are demanding we w/draw from Iraq too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:03 PM Response to Reply #55 |
121. There are 22 of them that face having to be reelected in 2008! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 07:52 AM Response to Reply #121 |
178. Far more would fall if they had an impeached president from their party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 09:17 AM Response to Reply #178 |
182. Hmm... I suppose they wanted Carter to win back in the 70's then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #182 |
184. It's difficult to compare the aftermath of Watergate with a hypothetical but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 02:16 PM Response to Reply #184 |
186. The point is, if they were just concerned about partisan politics and winning reelection then WHY... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:52 PM Response to Reply #54 |
95. Amen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #54 |
189. Amazing, isn't it! I'm with you- may she burn in hell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 04:19 AM Response to Original message |
3. I've said my piece on this subject |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 04:56 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. and you are spot on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:31 AM Response to Original message |
6. Blackmail most foul. What were these people thinking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:45 AM Response to Original message |
7. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. ...yes it was. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #7 |
30. And Turley has no fucking proof of anything you just quoted. It sure sounds good, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. blah blah blah blah blah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #35 |
63. LOL n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 01:19 PM Response to Reply #30 |
45. He doesn't have proof of a quid pro quo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:19 PM Response to Reply #45 |
72. You are lying. Those are not the facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:29 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. You're damn right I insulted the so-called leadership |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 11:40 AM Response to Reply #72 |
185. Thanks Coyote for some sanity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:11 PM Response to Reply #30 |
68. You are so correct. There are too many Bush Junta enablers aiding and abetting the crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:52 PM Response to Reply #30 |
94. prove it wasn;t true. the proof dagger cuts both ways, I will trust |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 09:23 PM Response to Reply #30 |
111. Nonsense . . . do you see any investigations going forward? On wiretapping ?? On torture??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
31. Indeed it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:10 AM Response to Original message |
8. so does Turley provide any evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:13 AM Response to Reply #8 |
170. No, that's like Nancy Pelosi said, before she was even installed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
187. Nancy has assured the WORLD that impeachment is off the table... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:30 AM Response to Original message |
9. Democrats attacking Democrats. A surefire road to victory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:44 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. When "Democrats" start joining the torture crimes, they lose their status as "Democrats" in my book. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. You've no proof, nor does Turley, of your assertion Dems joined torture crimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 01:12 PM Response to Reply #27 |
43. but elected Democrats suck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. No, we just need to get rid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #27 |
76. Jonathan Turley is not the "WaPo." He is a professor at George Washington University Law School. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 09:57 PM Response to Reply #27 |
119. Has Speaker Pelosi denied that she was told about the torture --- ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
117. Aren't we talking about DLC-Democrats . . . ???? And how many here are pro-DLC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 07:16 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. please why would you want these people in power anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnyxCollie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #13 |
61. Authoritarian personalities need not be right-wing exclusively. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:01 PM Response to Reply #61 |
120. Authoritarianism is the driving force of the right -- of fascism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnyxCollie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:54 AM Response to Reply #120 |
175. The Authoritarians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 10:13 PM Response to Reply #175 |
190. Wrong . . . Even J. Edgar Hoover used to refer to "totalitarian Communism" --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
67. Because they are our elected Representatives, chosen by the People, and because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:07 PM Response to Reply #67 |
123. We did not vote for Pelosi; that's an inside deal --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 09:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
118. OK -- agree --- but Democrats understanding what may have already happened --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #9 |
17. there are those who would walk all over our party for power and a paycheck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
124. We have a "corporate wing" of the Democratic Party in the D L C --- !!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. So, if Bush stuck a D beside his name, you would support him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #9 |
64. victory in what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
D23MIURG23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 07:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
98. On the contrary... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
115. Yep --- let's get there BY ANY MEANS . . . . !!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:38 AM Response to Original message |
10. She's terrible- a terrible leader. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 07:07 AM Response to Original message |
12. I generally like Turley, but never forget ......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
125. OK --- that's a huge strike against Turley . . . . that we should all keep in mind --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 08:33 AM Response to Original message |
14. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
15. Who the hell is Turley, and why should I buy into what he is saying? Was he there? Does he have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 09:06 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Background on Turley. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:21 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. I've heard Turley wander off the truth road in this kind of talk setting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Your post on Turley neglects the point he provides ZERO facts when he trashes Dems whilst spinning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:14 PM Response to Reply #23 |
69. I'm interested what theory you have that is more plausible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
92. WHY is Pelosi sticking to this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:20 PM Response to Reply #23 |
126. Turley has been on with Randi twice ....in regard to the same subject --- "no impeachment deal" --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
73. And Cut His Public Teeth, Sir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:57 PM Response to Reply #73 |
97. I've read his remarks, and nowhere did I read where he was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:28 PM Response to Reply #73 |
128. OK -- let's take Turley out of it --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
77. Here is a fact. Pelosi and Harman said, "HELL NO" and where is that legal opinion?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:35 PM Response to Reply #77 |
131. Pelso must recognize as we do that Busco can't produce the "legal opinion" --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
81. more than anything else, Turley is a shameless self-promoter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stlsaxman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 08:30 PM Response to Reply #81 |
104. that's becoming clearer and clearer to me each time i hear from him... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
19. I call BULLSHIT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. I usually agree with you but can't on this because the Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #26 |
36. They are acting like they were lied to. But, instant gratification is elusive in politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Have you heard what Jane Harmon has to say? I can't find anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #39 |
49. She is seeking declassification of her letter of protest. Bring it into the light, she says. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Good. I'm glad to hear that. They need to get their response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 01:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
47. Sticks and stones L. Coyote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 01:57 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Wrong. First check your facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Check YOUR facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. If "waterboarding" was in fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:44 PM Response to Reply #53 |
79. If Pelosi is now expected to respond to all the BULLSHIT, she needs a staff of 20 for DU alone! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:56 PM Response to Reply #79 |
84. She doesn't say she was not told about waterboarding in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:00 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. Again, try to keep up. She has responded. Do your homework. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:14 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. Link? You assert, you link. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #86 |
91. OK, I read her statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #91 |
135. Let's try to be real. She does not deny going to the moon either. Did she go? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngharry (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:15 PM Response to Reply #19 |
70. I call bullshit on your disinformation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:46 PM Response to Reply #70 |
80. And, do tell us what is disinformation in it?? Easy to say, without further analysis! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngharry (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
74. bullshit on your disinformation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
133. Disagree re Randi --- she is usually very on the button --- good intelligence --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
22. This is the SECOND time Turley was on Randi flinging shit he has no proof of, trashing Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #22 |
134. I, for one, requested that they go back to this subject --- and I made sure . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 01:36 AM Response to Reply #22 |
159. trashing dems? turley has been talking about the crap bushco has been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notanotherday (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
24. Go Randi GO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
25. Turley: "The fact that Democrats may have known about this since 2002 is a shocking revelation." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notanotherday (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:34 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. actualy we DO KNOW. that the use of water boarding was told to Pelosi a long time ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. No, you don't know. And it's sad that you already swallowed that mouthful without realisingo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. No you don't know ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notanotherday (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Yes, we do, the Pelosi and others are spining it. There needs to be a special prosecuter to invstig |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. "stooge or blinded by partisan" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #40 |
136. This is untrue --- Pelosi comes in and tells us "no impeachment" --- we're wondering WHY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #136 |
139. What is untrue? You're wondering why so she is an accomplice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:16 PM Response to Reply #139 |
146. No -- the CIA doesn't impeach presidents -- the USHR does . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:22 PM Response to Reply #146 |
149. What does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:49 PM Response to Reply #149 |
152. What does the CIA torture program have to do with Pelosi taking Bush off impeachment hook? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 12:10 AM Response to Reply #152 |
156. No it's not the same thing. Faulty logic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 12:20 AM Response to Reply #156 |
157. You have a failed president; a failed Iraq war; criminals in charge --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 01:58 AM Response to Reply #156 |
163. faulty logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-13-07 12:27 PM Response to Reply #163 |
195. No . . . that's what YOU said . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-13-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #195 |
196. i agree. i was quoting ms. "prosense" when i said "faulty logic" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:27 AM Response to Reply #196 |
197. Sorry -- I still on occasion get confused with the way these threads are laid out --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:38 AM Response to Reply #197 |
198. no problem. and thanks for kicking the thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 01:54 AM Response to Reply #139 |
161. complicit. accomplice. pick your poison. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 01:43 AM Response to Reply #33 |
160. um...people in his profession (lawyers) tend to use the term "may have" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Oh, another thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. No one's forgotten them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. What serious crime? Randi: nancy pelosi is an accomplice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. The crime that was serious enough to warrant a classified letter of protest from Harman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. You mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Yes. That includes Pelosi's statement. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:52 PM Response to Reply #41 |
82. Harmon protested the "enhanced interrogation" and asked toi see the legal opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:43 PM Response to Reply #82 |
150. Deleted message |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 01:56 AM Response to Reply #82 |
162. Um no, the "Dems" didn't, Harman did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #38 |
58. and when you witness a crime and do not report it--are you totally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:51 PM Response to Reply #58 |
93. Who said she witnessed a crime then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 09:27 PM Response to Reply #93 |
112. i thought she saw it on video. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 09:35 PM Response to Reply #112 |
113. You thought wrong! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 02:02 AM Response to Reply #113 |
164. she was briefed. so YOU THOUGHT WRONG. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #38 |
137. Pelosi was on the Intelligence Panel = oversight duties --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #137 |
143. The facts are there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:14 PM Response to Reply #143 |
145. Did you think that said that Pelosi wasn't informed of Torture ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:18 PM Response to Reply #145 |
148. Did you think it did? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:52 PM Response to Reply #148 |
153. Obviously, not . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
42. I'm calling BS on the Pelosi hate unless someone can show me how we convince 15 republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eagleswing963 (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #42 |
57. Well how do we send a message to ALL the Senate Republicans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #42 |
62. We convict by indicting and putting them on trial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 07:53 AM Response to Reply #62 |
179. Pretty difficult to understand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #42 |
66. Step one is the House we only need 219 there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:56 PM Response to Reply #66 |
83. and you can't get 219 at the moment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 08:11 PM Response to Reply #83 |
102. Check out this article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngharry (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:38 PM Response to Reply #42 |
78. Convicting Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 07:54 AM Response to Reply #78 |
180. I'm not willing to let them walk away from their crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #42 |
138. The GOP would have to respond to a public who may want to impeach Bush --- ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 02:04 AM Response to Reply #42 |
165. yeah...that fucking constitution is hardly worth it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 07:55 AM Response to Reply #165 |
181. That doesn't tell me how we're going to find 16 republican senators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caretha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 11:11 AM Response to Reply #181 |
183. Here's how we find 16 republican senators and more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #181 |
188. oh left coast--you don't need any senators to impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #42 |
199. This is not simply a matter of impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eagleswing963 (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
56. I think its time to email the "speaker" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 03:59 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. she's BEEN ignoring them. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 04:03 PM Response to Reply #56 |
60. If they're not complicit then impeachment would be the proper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:04 PM Response to Reply #56 |
140. americanvoices@mail.house.gov |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
65. well, no shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:16 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. consistently, its the same group of people that want us to ignore these things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:20 PM Response to Reply #71 |
90. I have something to say.......................... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #90 |
100. good luck with that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 08:06 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. So far there appears to be some silence on that matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:36 PM Response to Reply #101 |
132. just change one word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:30 PM Response to Reply #90 |
129. exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #71 |
141. Obviously, the DLC wants to ignore a lot of this --- !!! Including corp warprofiteers --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
85. Would somebody please explain to me why impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:12 PM Response to Reply #85 |
87. simple: either complicity or gross dereliction of duty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 06:19 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. Okay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #89 |
99. When Pelosi announced: "Impeachment is off the table." I knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #85 |
142. Because of $$ interests --- corporations making $$$ from war --- and MSM making $ from war --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 11:31 PM Response to Reply #85 |
193. becuse the public isn't demanding it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
105. Look |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
specimenfred1984 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
106. Logged in just to ignore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
107. Deleted message |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
109. Talk-talk-talk, that's all it'll ever be, it's all it will ever amount to, face it we're screwed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
110. WOULD WATER-BOARDING WORK ON THEM??????????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigBearJohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
114. HOW MUCH MORE CAN THE FUCKING DEMS BE EMBARRASSED? I'M RED IN THE FACE AS IT IS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
116. She may be feckless, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingFlorez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
122. I find all of this very suspect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:22 PM Response to Reply #122 |
127. But she didn't deny it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 10:34 PM Response to Reply #127 |
130. That's the thing I wonder about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 07:38 AM Response to Reply #127 |
176. And with her crediblility already is shambles- she didn't lash out. She made a 'statement' . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:09 PM Response to Reply #122 |
144. Is Pelosi denying that she was told about the torture program . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:48 PM Response to Reply #144 |
151. Read what she has said, and what her staff have said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:53 PM Response to Reply #151 |
154. I've read it and basically it says nothing --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetheonlyway (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
147. ANSWER THIS QUESTION: Why is Justice Department Only Place to go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 11:54 PM Response to Reply #147 |
155. Have you heard any Democratic candidate call for a Special Prosecutor --- ????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 01:20 AM Response to Reply #155 |
158. didn't biden? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 02:56 AM Response to Reply #155 |
169. well, biden called for one for the destruction of the cia tapes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 02:31 AM Response to Original message |
166. Accomplice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solar_Power (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 10:44 PM Response to Reply #166 |
191. co-conspirator is correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 02:52 AM Response to Original message |
167. What possible National security risk was involved that this committee should honor secrecy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 02:56 AM Response to Reply #167 |
168. Look at all the comments.Pelosi et al actions now making sense, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WakingUpUSA (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:23 AM Response to Original message |
171. When is the Speaker of the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:48 AM Response to Reply #171 |
174. she has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:27 AM Response to Original message |
172. Yep. K*R Very nice one! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:47 AM Response to Reply #172 |
173. (thank you) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
192. Questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-13-07 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
194. RawStory: Intel Chair "was kept in the dark about severe interrogations" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 08:54 AM Response to Reply #194 |
200. Kept in the dark? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC