|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
pamela
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:30 AM Original message |
"Edwards is the only Democrat who beats all four Republicans" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:35 AM Response to Original message |
1. He's the easy win. The way to go ... Edwards '08 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pamela
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Another quote from that article just kills me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. I don't get that comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:43 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. it means surrender |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. And what's wrong with Edwards' principals ? He's intelligent, informed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 10:25 PM Response to Reply #35 |
47. what's wrong with Edwards' principals ? EVERYTHING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 02:31 AM Response to Reply #47 |
58. What total utter bullshit. But go on and continue to foam at the mouth. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 10:12 AM Response to Reply #58 |
64. mad because I called a spade a spade? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 09:32 PM Response to Reply #29 |
45. I think they mean, "perceived electability" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southtpa
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 06:33 AM Response to Reply #3 |
61. win? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 08:14 AM Response to Reply #3 |
62. "Electability" is a phony issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 10:17 AM Response to Reply #62 |
65. going down a slippery slope? we're already at the bottom covered in muck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AdHocSolver
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #62 |
70. Electability is a perfectly valid criterion, provided you choose someone electable. Kerry was not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 09:30 AM Response to Reply #1 |
63. The easy way out is what got us into our many crises. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #63 |
66. lowest common denominator rules. USA! USA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:56 AM Response to Original message |
2. kick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SecularMotion
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
4. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
5. i think a blind monkey could beat all the thugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. It's not that we have to beat the "thugs" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
49. Great. Anybody KNOW a blind monkey that wants to get in? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 05:04 AM Response to Reply #49 |
60. The blind monkey has already served two terms.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sancho
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
6. Not really, if you look at the national neutral polls head to head: Hillary wins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SecularMotion
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
8. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
9. Look at these numbers from the Linked Article... Edwards Rocks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
10. Sounds about right to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
11. Like the GOP strategist told Tim Russert this morning.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:19 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Absolutely.Edwards 08 is the only answer if we want to win! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:39 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Kick for a reality check. JRE is OVERWHELMINGLY the best candidate. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. I agree!Back at cha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elspeth
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:13 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:14 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. The new CNN poll has Edwards beating all Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
46. Because they are frothing at the mouth to run against... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbackjon
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
15. Fortunately, the Democratic Candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
16. R&K ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stump
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
17. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Plucketeer
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #17 |
43. INDEED!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FatDave
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
18. John Edwards can bring us Mondale's Revenge on election night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pamela
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. "but Edwards could turn that whole fucking map blue" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:17 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Funny you should mention that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:16 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Oh yeah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
39. As Minnesotan and Mondale supporter in general, I'll say that would be DIVINE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pamela
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 10:36 PM Response to Reply #39 |
48. Here's a nice visual... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:53 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. That is down right therapeutic! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nosferaustin
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:02 AM Response to Reply #48 |
52. nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pamela
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. We can dream. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
19. Yet another good reason to vote for him in the primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:35 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. What's funny, here in Virginia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting for hope
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
20. Damn - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
26. Perception time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 10:26 AM Response to Reply #26 |
67. thank you for your intelligent comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
27. Works for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiethm75
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
28. kick n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
31. John Edwards is my second choice, and I will volunteer for him enthusiastically if he gets the nod.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
32. Of course. And he would expand our hold on Congress the most too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
33. R&K |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
36. Huh?? This statement makes no logical sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:14 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Edwards beats 4 Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
38. That's the primary reason I support JE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
downindixie
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
40. Edwards is my choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
41. K&R. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
42. Kick this, great news for the Edwards campaign, nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlingBlade
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 09:20 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Kick it high |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AgadorSparticus
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
50. I must say, of the leading 3 Dems, I like Edwards the best anyways. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 10:29 AM Response to Reply #50 |
68. what's the point of having a choice when you're choosing between 3 of the same thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theHandpuppet
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:09 AM Response to Original message |
53. I'm leaning towards Edwards more and more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. that's my only objection also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 10:32 AM Response to Reply #53 |
69. "He's a fighter and in the political arena, a true heavyweight" - since when? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenTea
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
56. Edwards will win the presidency.... No doubt! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinrobot
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 02:08 AM Response to Original message |
57. He's got my vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 02:45 AM Response to Original message |
59. Geaux Edwards!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC