Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So the church parishioner should have just let a potential massacre happen?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:40 AM
Original message
So the church parishioner should have just let a potential massacre happen?
Every thread regarding the CO chuch shootings seems to have some post along the lines of "I guess "thou shall not kill" is open to interpretation".

For those posters, I have a simple question. What was the alternative?

Don't give me "shoot to disarm" as that only works in movies and fantasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think that
she did the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. I thought she did shoot to disarm first. But he wouldn't stop.
I'm afraid that my compassion is for the woman who will have that selfish asshole's face in front of her eyes for the rest of her life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. One account was that she gave the shooter a chance to surrender
Edited on Tue Dec-11-07 08:47 AM by Mike Daniels
and the perp shot at her first forcing her to return fire.

The account seems to change every so often as things of this nature tend to do.

Either way, anyone who chooses this event to make some supposedly witty comment about "thou shall not kill" is simply an idiot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UnyieldingHierophant Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Honestly, I would have gave no warning to the guy
If she did, she's a cool customer, I would have just dumped the clip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. There's really no use arguing with those people.
You can say what you want on the Internet, annoy lots of people with it, and face little consequences. That's what's happening here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. No, She did her job
What people need to remember is that the actual translation is "Thou Shalt not Murder", as far as alternatives there's always the New Testament line of "turning the other cheek"!

Shooting to disarm can be accomplished, but shooting to kill is what most law enforcement and the military train their personnel for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. .That was simple self defense
note SHE did what she had to do. No imaginary god shot anyone or provided her with inspiration. That interpretation may make her feel better but it pisses me the hell off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. your anger at her "interpretation" had she been aboard a plane in 2001?
Me, I don't care if she was a Moonie thinking the criminal was an alien that just stepped off his spaceship.

I don't care if the potted plant next to the door told her to do it.

She saved lives.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omphaloskepsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. I thought we already had a few threads about the shootings..
Why drop your litter here with starting a new thread instead of posting your thoughts in one of the many that already exist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Because I find the concept that self-defense is moral hypocrisy to be intriguing in its own right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. I have no problem with what she did, but it's very odd to hear the "God is my co-shooter" thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Armed Guards at Churches
Look at the bigger picture -- this is what is happening in the United States of America.

We have armed guards patrolling these mega-churches?

How rampant is our fear?

How angry and distraught are our youth?

How much alienation from society is seething among our people?

What is also of great interest -- as a sign of the state of our culture -- is that there are so many folks positively giddy over the armed guard shooting and killing this kid. The focal point of this tragedy is increasingly about how it was 'heroic' that a guard killed a crazy man. The call for everyone to carry a weapon to defend themselves is already growing. That should tell us how afraid and fearful so many people have become in Bush's 9/11 America -- they cheer for the killing of the 'bad guys' whether here or in Iraq or in Afghanistan.

Sadly, this incident, the mall massacre last week, Virginia Tech, etc., are solid indications that civil society in this country is breaking down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. When you realize that these places are less "churches" than...
indoctrination camps for the military/industrial/capitalistic/fascist complexes you will have fewer questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. ITA. They are living and dying by the sword, so to speak. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I agree with that...
any church that is so large and impersonal, they need to have security guards for the parishioners and body guards for the ministers, that would not be a church that I would attend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. If you had conned as many people as
Ted Haggart did along the way, you'd need armed guards. All mega-churches have bodyguards for their con men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. No, no, no
Don't look at any bigger picture; focus only on one small, tightly circumscribed incident. Otherwise the argument begins to crack, fragment and fall apart, and the High Church of Redemptive Violence will not brook heresy. In my congregation (and lots of others), we call it "proof texting," a device designed to squelch all further discussion by slamming down a selected verse like the ace of trumps. Same thing's happening here, but you're not supposed to notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. I wonder how many other kids are being raised the same way
as the shooter. Somehow, he got the idea that he was "justified" in doing this. He had some rationale for doing what he had been taught was wrong. If churches are becoming militant in the way they behave politically and in how they raise their kids, is it any wonder that they need security systems and armed guards for a house of worship, which should be a house of peace?

Maybe putting schools on church property is not such a good idea; maybe that changes the perception that a place is "holy".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
15. I haven't been through these threads you cite here..
however, maybe at least some of the snark is more directed at the hypocritical fundies who pick and choose which of God's laws are open to interpretation, and which aren't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
18. Of course not. She did right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
20. If I'm going to judge anyone....
it's going to be the nut who took the time to plan for and follow through on slaughtering innocent people in their place of worship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
21. I was struck...
by her contention that the police training she recieved while working in law enforcement, had absolutely nothing to do with the actions she took. Looks like, if you choose the "right" people for law enforcement jobs, any training for said occupation would be unnecessary. Just an observation. Thanks.
quickesst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC