|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:42 PM Original message |
Would someone please explain how we're going to get 2/3 of the Senate to vote to convict? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. Three answers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. It does matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
24. "Investigations are ongoing " actually investigations are going nowhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
44. Still doesn't get us 66 votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
56. There have been two Presidents Impeached in our history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. I hate to split hairs, but the Constitution does not compell Congress to impeach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why do we have to convict? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. See post #5 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. SIMPLE: Too many felonies to not convict. Building a case is required. Once that is done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. Faith based reasoning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
4. Once the crimes are outlined, it will be too politically unpopular not to convict |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Investigations are going on now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
64. We can't enforce those investigations because of "executive privilege" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
6. Well, you might start by showing the video of children being raped at Abu Ghraib... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Nothing preventing that from being shown now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. The tapes were ordered to be released after an ACLU lawsuit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. It's pretty clear that investigations are ongoing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
11. January 22, 2008, appoint a special prosecutor..charge them all THEN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I think that's exactly the path to take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
12. Put two million angry citizens in the streets of D.C. during the proceedings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. That sure stopped the Iraq War! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demnan
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
13. Look at Nixon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. "The Republicans would ultimately force them to leave!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Yeah, Nixon resigned... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
17. Call me crazy, but isn't there an investigation first? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. There are investigations going on now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:11 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. They aren't impeachment investigations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:13 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. exactly. that's what I thought... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:19 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. Yes. Impeachment is a process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #37 |
58. Thanks for the clarification. :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #28 |
47. There are some differences. Not enough to get us 66 votes though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #47 |
57. How can anyone say how many votes it'll get or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:11 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. Not really, but keep repeating that, it is amusing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #29 |
48. And that makes you think impeachment will succeed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:39 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. No it makes your argument concerning ongoing investiations false. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:44 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. We're just going to have to disagree here then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
22. innocent until found guilty is the american way of law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:13 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. Prosecutors don't send cases to trial they don't feel they can win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. I totally disagree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. We didn't impeach Reagan for Iran Contra |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:45 PM Response to Reply #43 |
55. whatever, two wrongs make a right everyone knows that, huh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:59 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. We still don't have 66 votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
23. Have hearings, put it in front of the public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
34. More faith based reasoning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:14 PM Response to Reply #34 |
66. Its Democracy, its the Constitution, its the process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
25. Consider that their sole loyalty is to their reelection... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:25 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. I do think otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:58 PM Response to Reply #39 |
60. I think we're fairly close, but a few counterpoints... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. I think we are pretty close on several of these points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. I think re executive privilege... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
27. How will we get ANY votes to convict... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
30. 66 votes. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. 51 + 15 right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #33 |
49. correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. No no no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:55 PM Response to Reply #53 |
59. And I pointed out that Nixon started out the same way. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:21 PM Response to Reply #59 |
63. If people could point to any sort of evidence that the current crop of republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
35. 70 percent of the Republican Senators drop dead of a heart attack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
36. By impeaching the bastards and putting them on trial. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
China_cat
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
38. How can you possibly get Joe Lieberman + 15 other republicans to vote to convict? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:26 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. LOL - Well, then you might have a chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
42. But once we raise awareness, then awareness will be raised! And once that happens, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
45. These historical crimes need to go on record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:39 PM Response to Reply #45 |
51. How is the Constitution defended if we can't convict them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
46. An Impeachment investigation will bring out there crimes and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:41 PM Response to Reply #46 |
52. And we're just supposed to take this on faith? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC