Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Lowest of Scum: Charities gave Less than one-third raised to Veterans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 01:31 PM
Original message
The Lowest of Scum: Charities gave Less than one-third raised to Veterans
Edited on Thu Dec-13-07 01:37 PM by spanone
Support the Troops My Ass

~snip~Americans gave millions of dollars in the past year to veterans charities designed to help troops wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan, but several of the groups spent relatively little money on the wounded, according to a leading watchdog organization and federal tax filings.

Eight veterans charities, including some of the nation's largest, gave less than a third of the money raised to the causes they champion, far below the recommended standard, the American Institute of Philanthropy says in a report. One group passed along 1 cent for every dollar raised, the report says. Another paid its founder and his wife a combined $540,000 in compensation and benefits last year, a Washington Post analysis of tax filings showed.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2007/12/13/ST2007121300732.html?hpid=topnews

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. This pisses me off to damn near blindness
We give to several charities each year and some of them are on that list. And it puts our vets in a catch-22. My first reaction is to say fuck you you will not get another penny of my money. I will eventually calm down and refigure my charitable giving plans for next year. Christ, I guess those who want to assist vets will have to personally give them money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. i also gave to veterans charities this year.....or i thought i did.
i'm not sure what i will do next year. this sure pisses me off too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I gave to Operation Helmet, IAVA and VoteVets.org.
Edited on Thu Dec-13-07 02:01 PM by IanDB1

http://www.operation-helmet.org/



http://www.iava.org/


http://www.votevets.org/


I was literally MOMENTS away from donating to Homes For Our Troops, when I came across THIS guy's story, and changed my mind:

Iraqi war vet suing Michael Moore BUSTED!!!

<snip>

If Sgt. Damon wasn't "left behind" by the military, Bush, and goverment...
... then why did it take a private charity, Homes for our Troops, along with 59 corporate donors, to put a roof over his head?

More:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1336739

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would appreciate any positive experiences anyone has had
in dealing with "Vets" groups and charitable givings to them. I am rethinking my spending plans for next year. Thank you in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Operation Helmet never sent me a thank-you letter. I think I pissed them off.
Edited on Thu Dec-13-07 02:04 PM by IanDB1
When you donated, you could specify which state or units, etc. you wanted your helmet upgrade kits to go to. I donated enough for 1-2 kits, and specified that they were not to go to units involved in the transport, interrogation, or guarding of prisoners.

I think I pissed-off the guy running the charity, which might be why I never got a thank-you letter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. here is a group working hard on behalf of vets-Veterans for Commonsense-hearing tomorrow in SF
Edited on Thu Dec-13-07 03:09 PM by fed-up
http://www.veteransforcommonsense.org/articleid/8923

Here is an update about our Veterans for Common Sense (VCS) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Veterans for Common Sense and Veterans United for Truth v. Gordon Mansfield, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

On December 14, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Senior Judge Samuel Conti, U.S. District Court for Northern California, will hear oral arguments about VA’s motion to dismiss our law suit. The Federal court is located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco. VCS is vigorously opposing VA’s attempt to stop our lawsuit.

On July 23, 2007, VCS filed a class action lawsuit against VA in order to force them to provide prompt healthcare and disability benefits for our returning Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans, especially those suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

VCS is ably represented by the law firm, Morrison & Foerster located in San Francisco and Disability Rights Advocates located in Berkeley, California. Both represent VCS pro bono as a service to our Nation’s veterans.


what the case is about, follow link for hotlinks in article

http://www.veteransptsdclassaction.org/index.html

What This Case Is About

Many veterans who have fought in Iraq and/or Afghanistan, as well as those who served in earlier conflicts, are not being given the disability compensation, medical services and care they need. A much higher percentage of these veterans suffer with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder ("PTSD") than veterans of any previous war, due to the multiple tours many are serving, the unrelenting vigilance required by the circumstances, the greater prevalence of brain injuries caused by the types of weaponry in use, among other reasons. Despite this, the Department of Veterans' Affairs ("DVA") is failing to provide adequate and timely benefits and medical care. This federal lawsuit, on behalf of veterans with pending claims based upon PTSD, regardless of the conflict in which they served, is for declaratory and injunctive relief, based primarily on the due process clause of the Constitution. We will focus on the following issues:

The widespread breakdown of the DVA's adjudication and health care systems for veterans experiencing PTSD. For example, the application process is too complicated; even veterans with "successful" claims are given ratings that are too low; veterans who are rated as disabled continue to be denied appropriate medical care and ongoing support;
The prolonged administrative delays in processing PTSD claims, at both the regional office and appellate levels. Applications are often bounced up and down through a complicated appeals process. We estimate that the average time for a claim to go through the entire appeals process, from the Regional Office to a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court, is between twelve and fifteen years;
A variety of statutory and regulatory impediments to a veteran's ability to collect PTSD compensation. These include the inability to obtain discovery, the absence of subpoena power for documents and witnesses, and the inability to hire a lawyer to help out at the regional office level, among other impediments; and
A pattern and practice of internal DVA abuses and improper rules. These are difficult to detect or prove without discovery.
You are invited to familiarize yourselves with these issues by visiting our Resources, to fill out and submit the Veteran Information Intake Form, to read the pivotal Court-filed Documents in the case and to read relevant News Articles. We appreciate your interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. What about that charity that Limbaugh is involved in? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. You mean *Draft Dodging Lying Propagandist Sunzabitches r Us*?



:shrug:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC