Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mukasey on the Spot-How will the AG respond to the CIA's destruction of interrogation videotapes?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 05:33 PM
Original message
Mukasey on the Spot-How will the AG respond to the CIA's destruction of interrogation videotapes?
http://www.newsweek.com/id/74317

Mukasey on the Spot

How will the new attorney general respond to the CIA's destruction of interrogation videotapes?
Aggressive interrogation techniques of terror suspects is under scrutiny
By Michael Isikoff, Mark Hosenball and Michael Hirsh | NEWSWEEK
Dec 17, 2007 Issue


The CIA revealed last week that it had destroyed tapes of Al Qaeda detainees being questioned despite at least three official requests for evidence relating to the agency's interrogation practices. The disclosure provoked demands for a Justice Department investigation, casting a spotlight on new Attorney General Michael Mukasey. A former federal judge, Mukasey pledged during his confirmation hearings to exercise independent judgment at Justice, saying he wouldn't hesitate to make tough calls that might displease the White House. But such an investigation could ultimately touch on some of the most sensitive secrets of the Bush administration: the use of aggressive interrogation techniques—such as waterboarding—that critics say amount to torture. The methods were approved at the highest levels of the White House, and Mukasey himself almost saw his nomination derailed when he refused to say whether waterboarding was illegal. Last week Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the assistant Senate Democratic leader, wrote to Mukasey requesting a probe into whether the CIA violated any laws by destroying the tapes. "The CIA apparently withheld information about the existence of these videotapes from official proceedings, including the 9/11 Commission and a federal court," Durbin said.

Justice officials refused to comment on what the new A.G. will do, but White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said that if he does open an investigation, the White House would support him. The videotapes, made in 2002, showed the questioning of two high-level Qaeda detainees, including logistics chief Abu Zubaydah, whose interrogation at a secret cell in Thailand sparked an internal battle within the U.S. intelligence community after FBI agents angrily protested the aggressive methods that were used. In addition to waterboarding, Zubaydah was subjected to sleep deprivation and bombarded with blaring rock music by the Red Hot Chili Peppers. One agent was so offended he threatened to arrest the CIA interrogators, according to two former government officials directly familiar with the dispute.

CIA officials said last week that the decision to destroy the tapes was made three years later, in an effort to protect the identities of the interrogators on the chance the tapes were to leak. As it turns out, the CIA destroyed the tapes despite requests for records of the interrogations by the Senate intelligence committee and the 9/11 Commission; in an earlier letter, Rep. Jane Harman, the then ranking member of the House intelligence committee, also specifically asked the agency not to dispose of any such tapes. The Senate committee's then vice chairman, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, disclosed last week that he had written a letter, in May 2005, seeking more than 100 documents related to the detention and interrogation practices, including a previously unknown CIA Office of General Counsel report, and that the agency refused to comply. The agency also told a federal judge in the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui that it had no videotapes of interrogations related to the case. But federal prosecutors recently disclosed that the CIA's declarations contained "factual errors" after they discovered that the agency had retained two videos and an audiotape of detainee interrogations.

A major focus of a Justice probe into the tapes would be who actually ordered their destruction—and why. The director of the CIA at the time, Porter Goss, thought he had an "understanding" with operational officials that such tapes would be preserved, and he "wasn't happy" when he found out "after the fact" that the tapes had been destroyed, according to a person familiar with Goss's views who asked for anonymity discussing a sensitive matter. An intelligence official indicated that the decision was made by the head of the CIA's Clandestine Service at the time, Jose Rodriguez. Still other ex-agency officials say Rodriguez was a loyal subordinate who would not have made such a decision on his own. Whoever ordered it, all eyes are on Mukasey now.

© 2007 Newsweek, Inc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. I heard on PBS a hour or so ago that it was a good thing the tapes were destroyed because
basically, if the tapes leaked out what we were doing to the imprisoned Muslims, it would up set the Muslims in the middle east and we don't want that. Nothing was said about protecting bu$h/cheney.
I was driving and didn't get the idiots name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That reasoning means we have to destroy everything at CIA, I guess.
Because it might leak. RIGHT :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R & Impeach two too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Transcripts need to be Subpoened by the Court
that requested the tapes in the 1st place. This should not be left to
the DOJ or Congress because they will bury the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. NEW: MUKASEY, Torture, and a Special Prosecutor. A Conflict of Interest Conundrum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC