Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An excerpt from The Des Moines Register's 2004 endorsement:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 12:31 AM
Original message
An excerpt from The Des Moines Register's 2004 endorsement:
John Edwards -- his time is now By Register Editorial Board

The more we watched him, the more we read his speeches and studied his positions, the more we saw him comport himself in debate, the more we learned about his life story, the more our editorial board came to conclude he's a cut above the others.... Edwards grew up around the textile mills in the Southeast. He describes his family as close-knit and hard-working - the kind of family that had to sit around the kitchen table to figure out what to sacrifice to send their son to college. Edwards played high school football, worked some summers in the mills and studied textiles at North Carolina State University, figuring on returning to the mills as his family's first college graduate.

Instead, he went on to law school at the University of North Carolina, where he met his future bride. Both became lawyers. John specialized in trial law, winning some of the most spectacular verdicts in North Carolina history and earning a small fortune by the time he was in his 40s. The couple endured the loss of a 16-year-old son in a highway accident in 1996. They have three surviving children.

In his first try for public office, Edwards defeated an incumbent Republican in 1998 to win a seat in the U.S. Senate from North Carolina. He financed his own campaign, avoiding contributions from lobbyists. ... Roll back some or all of the Bush tax cuts and redirect the money into health care and education. Conduct a foreign policy that is more collaborative and less bellicose.... it is Edwards who most eloquently and believably expresses this point of view, with his trial-lawyer skill for distilling arguments into compelling language that moves a jury of ordinary people. He speaks of there being two Americas:

"One America does the work, while another America reaps the reward. One America pays the taxes, while another America gets the tax breaks. If we want America to be a growing, thriving democracy with the strongest middle class on Earth, we must choose a different path."

If Edwards wins the Democratic nomination, voters this fall would have a choice between two men who almost perfectly embody the rival political philosophies in America today. George W. Bush and John Edwards are attractive, likable, energetic. They have about the same level of prior experience in government - and they are polar opposites.

Bush is from a prominent family, attended Ivy League universities, made his fortune in business and fervently believes the philosophy of "a rising tide lifts all boats." His policies flow from the conviction that all Americans will gain if business is largely unfettered and if investors are better rewarded.

Edwards is from a working-class family, attended public universities, made his fortune representing ordinary people in the courtroom and fervently believes that America does best when doors of opportunity are open to anyone willing to work and get ahead. He says those opportunities are being choked off in an America today that rewards wealth, not work. Emblematic of his approach is his proposal to pay the first year's tuition to a state university or community college for any student willing to work.... What a clear and attractive choice an Edwards vs. Bush fall campaign would offer. Beginning in the Iowa caucuses next Monday, Democrats would do well to give that choice to Americans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder what the chances are that they endorse him again? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'd say it is between Edwards and Obama... I think Edwards may get the Endorsement Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. They could make the same Endorsement of Edwards This Time
THink how different the last 7 years would have been with Edwards as President.

THink how different the next 8 years would be if Edwards were President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. My problem with Edwards is
I am not sure it would have been much different given his record while he actually held office. Maybe he is a changed man. I may never know for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Gore has evolved further from his electoral record than Edwards. One can either accept that Gore and
Edited on Sat Dec-15-07 01:02 AM by Stop Cornyn
Edwards are really changed or you can vote for Obama or Hillary who neither vote as anything but moderates and offer moderate platforms too. Or we can vote for a true liberal who has a liberal platform and who votes liberal, too, and see how Kucinich does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Isn't Edwards a completely different candidate than 2004?
Not knocking Johnny, he's my very close second choice, but I've seen this meme tossed about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Actually Edwards was my Senator, and he was always progressive in his thinking...
He gets criticized incessantly by posters who only know what 'they have heard' about him and his time in the Senate.

Edwards beat one of the most entrenched Jesse Helms machine backed Republican Incumbent Senators you could find.

Edwards defended Clinton in the Removal Trial in the Senate, and during the cross-examination of key witnesses in the Monica affair. His closing argument on Clinton's behalf in the Senate was described as 'jaw dropping' and his handling of the matters gained him lots of respect in the Senate.

It is true Edwards introduced a few bills, but he worked with many of the most senior Democrats to improve bills on Education and Healthcare. He was smart enough to know he had to learn how things were done, and Gore came close to picking him instead of Leiberman.

Edwards is honest, and he would follow through on the agenda he is putting forth. He just needs the chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bongo Prophet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. You mean the last 3 years? Actually, I wanted 8 Kerry and maybe 8 Edwards.
I think VP would have allowed JE to mature a bit, and move a domestic agenda while Kerry focused on nuclear non-proliferation and global climate change/environment, etc etc.
Each to their strengths.

Kerry/ Edwards was a GREAT ticket, screw the detractors.
Still have the bumpersticker on my truck.
Used to get shit about it on occasion. No more.
...even in Texas.

It would be a better world.
And if Gore had chosen Kerry as VP instead of that x-dem, we would be in a WHOLE different place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct 18th 2024, 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC