|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Dems Will Win (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 10:10 AM Original message |
Senior Lecturer in Constitutional Law Pledges to REVERSE Bush Signing Statements When Elected Prez!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
1. Executive Orders are more than just the signing statements. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 10:20 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Who better to do it? Hillary won't even undo the torture signing statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 01:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
31. Personally, I am supporting Edwards, but Obama is my second choice. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
2. K&R... I'm gonna have to check Obama out a little better... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
4. Yup that tens to sway me a little too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
5. And yet he opposes Impeachment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Because there aren't enough Republican votes to impeach Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 10:46 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Not exactly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 10:52 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. You're right I should have said CONVICT. What Obama is saying that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #11 |
23. I won't grant that conviction is impossible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Impeachment can happen with zero Republican votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
30. Yes. Upholding the Constitution.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
7. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wizard777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
8. I'm starting to like Obama. At least he realizes that his first term as President will be about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
12. I would like a president who doesn't use the word "MY" when talking about the US AT's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. You have to understand the context this answer was given. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
13. He's not my first choice but I like him and this is a very good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
15. attention Mr.Obama - ALL signing statements are unconstitutional if ACTED upon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
16. Sorry But This One Won't Fly As Far As I'm Concerned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobendorfer (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
17. okay, think about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. You're wrong and here's why: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobendorfer (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. They could pass laws undoing specific signing statements, but not a single law banning them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. The courts have YET to rule on"signing ststements" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
18. good to read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
20. "The Constitutional Law Expert that wants to REVERSE unconstitutional Bush signing statements. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. They have standing in that they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Thanks, igil. The Constitution and the enacted laws of the land .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
State the Obvious (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
22. This belongs on homepage "Greatest Threads" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
24. If he really knows the Constitution, he would push for impeacment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
25. Two small points: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
33. University of Chicago, very impressive. Did he teach on this topic: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
34. Go O! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diane in sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-16-07 03:19 AM Response to Original message |
35. I can endorse this! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Oct 18th 2024, 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC