Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Dept.: Back Off on CIA Tapes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 06:20 PM
Original message
Justice Dept.: Back Off on CIA Tapes
Justice Department Wants Courts, Congress to Stay Out of Probe Into CIA Interrogation Tapes

CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden stops to speak to the media on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Dec. 13, 2007, upon his arrival for a closed-door hearing of the House Select Intelligence Oversight Panel. The controversy over destroyed CIA interrogation tapes is shaping up as a turf battle involving the courts, Congress and the White House, with the Bush administration telling its constitutional coequals to stay out of the investigation.

The Justice Department says it needs time and the freedom to probe the destruction of hundreds of hours of recordings of two suspected terrorists. After Attorney General Michael Mukasey refused congressional demands for information Friday, the Justice Department filed late-night court documents urging a federal judge not to begin his own inquiry.

The documents represent the first time the government has addressed the issue in court. In the papers, acting Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey S. Bucholtz said Kennedy lacked jurisdiction and he expressed concern that the judge might order CIA officials to testify.

rest of the article @ the link:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=4005598

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. neocons love to use the (bogus) argument of jurisdiction
they've done it time and again. Seems no one has 'jurisdiction' but the those who torture others. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, the House does have jurisdiction for impeachment.
Forget conviction in the Senate, but at least move on impeaching Mucuus-Eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. OK then, is there anything else you'd
Edited on Sat Dec-15-07 07:13 PM by jimshoes
like us not to look into? Just make a list, it'll be easier that way m'kay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC