Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stick a fork in Rudy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 07:13 AM
Original message
Stick a fork in Rudy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree with the Daily News.
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 07:25 AM by no_hypocrisy
Rudy humiliated Donna Hanover, his second wife repeatedly by running around in public with his media coordinator, Chrystine Latagano, and then with Judith Nathan, also married at the time, not to mention telling Hanover the marriage was over not only during a press conference but a press conference during the funeral of the archbishop of New York City.

Rudy repeated the mistakes of Woody Allen with "the heart wants what it wants", everyone else be damned. A lot of women would not vote for him as it would be indirectly supporting his personal decisions at which they are appalled.

Putting a white dress,a tiarra, and a wedding band on Judith Nathan doesn't erase his past history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Or hers (Queen J's)
The absolutely last straw was moving his mistress into Gracie Mansion while his wife Donna and their children were living there. That is an absolute outrage not only to Donna and the kids, but to the taxpayers of New York. Why should they have to subsidize his bimbo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Even those disastrous numbers are hugely weighted in Rudy's favor.
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 07:25 AM by Perry Logan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. This would appear to be based on the presumption...
...that the outcome of presidential election 2008 is to be decided by the will of the people.

Do we have good reason to believe this will be the case?

From what I saw of 2000 and 2004 it was our representative democracy on the receiving end of the proverbial fork.

Did I miss something? Or has something changed in the way votes are to be collected and counted?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rAVES Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Theres a slightly more glaring presumption here.. no?
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 07:45 AM by rAVES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. And that would be?
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 07:48 AM by Mr_Jefferson_24
...Hillary as the Dem nominee? I did notice that, and sadly, expect it is a safe one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rAVES Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bingo.. I hope you're wrong.. Obama or Biden would be much better.. well Kucinich if there was any
Justice... but alas..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solar Power Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. WELL........
YOU KNOW IT COULDN'T HAPPEN TO A NICER GUY..LET THE FIRE ROAST HIM TELL HE IS WELL DONE..
.............VERY WELL DONE, HELL..........THAT IS WHAT HE WOULD TO TO US..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. I would agree only if
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 08:45 AM by NI4NI
there weren't so many hypocritical family value republicans, or lying, war-mongering neo-cons still around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. This poll would be valid if men were not voting!
They only asked the question to 500 women. Rudy would probably do better if men were asked the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. The ivory hunters want Ru911dy's teeth when it's over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC