|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Toots
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:46 AM Original message |
Do you believe a three day waiting period saves lives? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
1. I would like to see some evidence, but I defintely think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:48 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Or battered wives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
21. or battered husbands - otherwise, it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nachoproblem
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
3. I don't know, but it probably saves more lives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alphafemale
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
4. I think it can. In some isolated cases. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
5. only if it is applied to the morning after pill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
24. Do you mean doing away with morning after pill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:50 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. it was a joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:02 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Got it, thanks. I can't keep everyone straight here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSPS
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
6. Homer SImpson: "Waiting period? But I'm mad now!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ingac70
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. "Despite 3-day waiting period, 7,000 guns obtained illegally" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:22 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Humorous but exactly my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
7. If you mean gun purchases, I'd like to see some data to support your opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:25 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. What would such data look like? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Perhaps a comparison of rates of certian types of crimes among states with varying laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I think you're right when you say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peregrine
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. There is no waiting period if a person has a CCL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 11:03 AM Response to Reply #16 |
34. Yes, in my case I get around it with my Federal Firearms License |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ingac70
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
8. I don't think so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
10. Maybe but I see it as a minimalist approach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
12. prolly does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheFriendlyAnarchist
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
17. It seems to me like a way to make those crimes premeditated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. or just use other means. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michreject
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
18. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
19. Before you have sex? hell ...that's what rubbers are for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
20. As a firm believer in the individual's right to bear arms I believ this is a reasonable regulation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 09:09 AM Response to Reply #20 |
28. All Laws become obsolete with that attitude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:10 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. "feelgood" laws are obsolete before passage, BIG waste of time/effort/taxes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamthebandfanman
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
23. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paladin
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
27. Yes (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Irreverend IX
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
29. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
30. Do you have evidence or data that says it does? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
32. What three-day waiting period? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 11:05 AM Response to Reply #32 |
35. In California we figured out how to accommodate a 10-day wait even at gun shows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 11:12 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Yes, that's a workaround ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hangingon
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
33. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC