|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
mudesi
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:29 PM Original message |
What if every Democrat was like Kucinich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. very very much better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. Better, without a doubt. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BringEmOn
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. The world would be better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. BETTER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. much worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. I'll agree with the Senate, but I think you underestimate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
35. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. Ah, I had completely forgotten about that aspect of it. Thank you for bringing that to my attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
36. You really hate liberals, don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWatcher
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:57 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. "I love Liberals, I am One." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. This is why Kucinichites will always be a very small |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:50 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. And that's why moderates will always be essentially useless... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #48 |
56. When have you ever seen me oppose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:20 PM Response to Reply #56 |
65. You oppose them by default... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:53 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. Again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #71 |
80. I don't have to marginalize myself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #41 |
69. don't feed them, Watcher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:55 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. You want liberals to go away? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:59 PM Response to Reply #69 |
74. Deleted message |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:03 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. Now Skittles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:04 AM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Deleted message |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:27 AM Response to Reply #76 |
78. You're responding to yourself now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #38 |
51. In all the months I've been aware of your presence here, I've never read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:56 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. You're simply wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:05 PM Response to Reply #51 |
59. Pay no attention to those polished black shoes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #51 |
70. Deleted message |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:56 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. I'm a troll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lil Missy
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
44. That's what I'm afraid of too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
45. Would that be because his ideas are actually progressive and therefore inherently unamerican... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #45 |
57. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:31 PM Response to Reply #57 |
68. His support is actually far broader... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #5 |
50. You're assuming the country was ever actually conservative, or is permanently so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:01 PM Response to Reply #50 |
58. well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:18 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. That is true. But Kucinich's views(especially those on the war, healthcare, and trade) are popular |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
6. i might consider a moderate republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam_Smith
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
7. Much better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
8. Better. But there would be a hell of a fight ahead of them.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angela Shelley
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
9. It would be easier to find a wife |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
10. The Democrats would have maybe 25 Senators and 160 Representatives, so yeah, I'm guessin' worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
11. Who the fuck would want NO diversity of thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. You mean conservative thought? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. no. I mean diversity. Bernie Sanders is not like Dennis kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stimbox
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. All of those people are in the minority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:59 PM Response to Reply #21 |
52. Uh, you're taking "like" a bit too literally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
13. Uh, worse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stimbox
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
14. If every Democrat were like Kucinich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. yes, let's have a clone congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stimbox
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. hook, line, sinker... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
16. The gene pool would be shorter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
begin_within
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
17. Meat would go away. War would go away. Pollution would go away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. yes, totalitarianism is so appealing- to some of you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
28. meat would go away? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
40. This type of Utopian illogic is why DK is not taken seriously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
18. Unfortunately I belive itwould be worse becase we'd NEVER WIN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:29 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. Why is it a Pug who is so far right can do it twice.. but not a Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:39 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Several reasons. First, the elections were altered. The country is split close enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:48 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Clinton Fatigue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
19. Not only would the country be better, it never would've gotten this bad. -n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
20. It's be amazing. And if all the centrists became Republicans, even better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
23. Far, far better. The Congressional Progressive Caucus are the only ones worth voting for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libertariandemocrat
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
26. Worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Well, according to the Republicans we have diversity right now.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. And so, even though they really ought to be doing life without parole,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. Edit: Never mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
30. That goes without saying: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
32. For one, we'd all have a much higher IQ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
46. Far Worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:01 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. How can you know that? How can you not be sure that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:18 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Oops. My Bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. You have a right to an opinion. I wasn't trying to silence you. I was just responding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:26 PM Response to Reply #61 |
67. LMAO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:56 AM Response to Reply #67 |
83. welcome back OMC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
47. We'd still complain about them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
49. The ideal Democrat would have Kucinich's views and look like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ileus
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
60. there would only be 3 democrats in power at any level...I'll pick worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
63. This country is not ready for someone like Kucinich yet. Too bad, but the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trashcanistanista
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
64. Actually, I think every democrat is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
66. Obviously better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
77. a totalitarian wetdream -- all party members in lockstep with leader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
79. Better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunkerbuster1
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
81. If by "like" you meant far more progressive than they are now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
82. Much worse ... we'd be a nation of robots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CT_Progressive
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
84. Dunno, but we'd be guaranteed a FLILF ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC