Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Veteran's group criticizes SOTU

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 04:05 AM
Original message
Veteran's group criticizes SOTU



A group composed of veterans of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq criticized President Bush for "ignoring" America's 1.6 million new veterans in Tuesday's State of the Union speech.

"Tonight President Bush once again failed to demonstrate a real commitment to the 1.6 million new American veterans who have been created under his watch," Paul Rieckhoff, the executive director of IAVA: Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said in a press release sent to RAW STORY. "For the second year in a row, the President in his State of the Union address chose to mention the troops only as a prop for his failing policies and ignored the nation's new veterans entirely."

Transcript of IAVA's press release:
#

NEW YORK - The nation's first and largest non-partisan organization representing veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, IAVA, released the following statement from Executive Director Paul Rieckhoff in response to the President's State of the Union address:

"Tonight President Bush once again failed to demonstrate a real commitment to the 1.6 million new American veterans who have been created under his watch," said Paul Rieckhoff, an Iraq War Veteran and the executive director of IAVA (www.iava.org). "For the second year in a row, the President in his State of the Union address chose to mention the troops only as a prop for his failing policies and ignored the nation's new veterans entirely."

"Over the past four years, this country has watched its men and women in uniform answer the call to duty over and over again, yet somehow today these new veterans are still faced with a drastically under-funded Veterans' Administration and an outdated GI Bill. It's time to reward our troops' sacrifices with more than just bureaucratic hassles and token gestures."

"Mr. President, this nation's new veterans and this new Congress will together rewrite the book on our approach to veterans' services, and we'll do it with or without your help," Rieckhoff said. "Tonight you demonstrated your willingness to send more troops into harms way. A demonstration of your commitment to preserving this nation's promise to its veterans is long overdue."

"In the coming weeks, the nation's first and largest Iraq and Afghanistan veterans group, IAVA, will release a legislative agenda that, if adopted, will go a long way towards addressing the many unacceptable problems facing our troops as they return from Iraq and Afghanistan," said Rieckhoff.

"Supporting our troops and veterans is not only our national obligation, it is also critical to maintaining a strong military and ensuring our national security. Shortages of armor, troops and equipment have hampered progress in theatre," Rieckhoff said. "Poor treatment of veterans and an inadequate G.I. Bill make recruitment more difficult. The use of National Guardsmen and Reservists leaves fewer troops at home for domestic emergencies. It is time that these force-readiness issues are treated with the urgency they deserve. And it is time that this nation, and our elected officials, renew the commitment to our troops and veterans."

IAVA: Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, is the nation's first and largest organization for veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, representing more than 60,000 members in all 50 states.
#

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/Group_President_Bush_ignored_Americas_1.6_0123.htmlhttp://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/Group_President_Bush_ignored_Americas_1.6_0123.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
As with most Republicans Bush loves to use the Armed Forces but then, sadly, he neglects to support them after they've outlived their usefulness to them. Some of these people are on their 3rd or 4th rotation in Iraq. They're tired, spent, used up and Bush just wipes his hands of them after he can't use them anymore.

There's going to be a whole new generation of post-war veterans who have myriad problems readapting to civilian life, just like the post Viet Nam era. And Bush wants to sweep them under the rug.

No way. Not this time. Hurray for the Vets! :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. For sure.


Thanks for the R. The voices on this subject need to get much louder while Congress is in session.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarbyUSMC Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC