Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Angola Indiana man threatens a tree trimmer and the cops find almost 300 guns and a million rounds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Union Label Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:39 PM
Original message
Angola Indiana man threatens a tree trimmer and the cops find almost 300 guns and a million rounds
Where is this guy getting all of these weapons of war and yes I saw on the video a bunch of assault weapons.
I hope theres a law in the area here that would prohibit storage of that many bullets what if the house caught fire.
This kind of shit needs to stop.

Imagine going to work with no worries in sight, only to have your life threatened just minutes after you arrive.

It happened just yesterday in Angola.

For the crew at Davey Tree Experts, it's a Friday definitely worth celebrating, for a few frightening moments Thursday morning, they didn't think they would live to see the weekend.

"I looked up and was staring right down the barrel of his gun,"says William McCollum.

"You've got 1200 volts of electricity flowing up over your head and got a guy below with a shotgun," says Jimmy Harbin.
http://www.indianasnewscenter.com/news/local/12519526.html#
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sanctified Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Guy was 71 and probably has been a collector for the past 60 of them.
Edited on Mon Dec-17-07 05:50 PM by MiltonF
I don't think there should be a limitation on the amount of
ammunition one should own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. One MILLION Rounds?
No one, I mean no one needs that much ammo.


This is the EXACT type of person why Gun Control/Registration/Limitation is needed - Armed Neo-Nazis with a million rounds of Ammo....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanctified Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. What makes you think he was a Neo-Nazi
More than likely the guy was an avid gun collector and target shooter but because of old age stopped target shooting but probably still bought ammunition out of habit. It's like my Grandma who still buys a ton of Groceries every week and makes sure to buy my Grandpas favorite beer even though she lives by herself and my Grandpa has been dead for 5 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I have an aunt who is the same way
She grew up in a poor family during the Great Depression, and is deathly afraid of starvation.

The amount of food she keeps stockpiled is mind-boggling. I mean things like five one-gallon bottles of ketchup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
30. They found a nazi Fucking flag in his house..I would say he was/is a neo nazi
I would suggest he was at least a white supremist!??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Probably boils black babies
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irreverend IX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #30
53. We know nothing about the Nazi flag he had...
If it was a war trophy packed in a trunk with other military memorabilia, it's a pretty big stretch to say he was a white supremacist. If he had a massive flag of modern manufacture hanging in his living room, then you might have a more compelling argument. Problem is, the story gives us no context for the flag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. At 71, he wouldn't have been old enough to be a WW2 veteran.
He'd have been born around 1936. So it's unlikely that the flag was a trophy of his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irreverend IX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #55
64. Not a trophy of his own...
But it could have been kept with a bunch of other people's captured trophies and military memorabilia he'd collected. If this guy had a lot of flags, uniforms and medals from different countries, calling him a Nazi is foolish. If he had a big Nazi flag and no other historical stuff, it's a different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
51. Maybe the NAZI flag they found????
And Ammo is NOT food...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #51
60. I have a British flag
Does that automatically make me a redcoat?

It's the same thing - the flag of a conquered enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. If and only if the overwhelming message of the Union Jack...
"Does that automatically make me a redcoat?"


If and only if the overwhelming message of the Union Jack symbol is one of oppression as the Nazi flag is. But since we both know that the Union Jack is seen less as a symbol of the Redcoats and more a symbol of Britain, your analogy doesn't quite pass the bullshit test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #62
84. By your reasoning, any object that bears symbols of the Nazi era in Germany automatically flags one
As a Nazi. Or so it appears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #60
75. Actually, I thought Britian was our ally now.
Are you allied with nazis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #75
83. The Germans are our allies now as well
Are you allied with nazis?

No. Are you allied with dipshit assholes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #83
86. The Germans yes, not the NAZIs...
And since we are both Democrats, I guess the answer would be yes..;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
90. he had a nazi flag in his house....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
98. No matter how you parse it, its insane and dangerous to others
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 05:47 PM by OzarkDem
Its not like collecting old newspapers or cats. Its live ordinance in a residential area owned by a crazy person. Other people have rights, too.

I hope they throw his ass in jail for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #98
111. If he's thrown in jail for a year or more, he will lose the right to own a gun
Problem solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I think it's a bit of a leap to say the guy is a neo-Nazi
I own an old Soviet Union flag, and I'm not a communist. Many German flags were taken as war trophies in World War II.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Yep. My grandpa had one, and my uncle has it today.
My grandfather pulled the flag off a building as he went through France. The man was about as far from "Nazi" as you can get, but the flag was a war trophy. He kept it in an old wooden footlocker along with a wehrmacht helmet, an altimeter he pulled from a crashed British bomber, and an old Luger. They were simply trophies of war, or souveniers to send back home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frosty1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Perhaps if the jews had
that much ammo the holocaust could have been prevented?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
43. The Jews turned in the guns
when ordered.

See what happens when the Governing body wants all privately owned guns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. There is only one reason for that much ammo: to kill a LOT of people.
Sounds like an obsessive nutjob to me.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. With ammunition prices as they are now, he was smart to stock up when he did
A million rounds may be enough to last him the rest of his life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanctified Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. But he did not kill anyone.
So your reasoning on why someone would have that much ammo does not work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
76. Sure it does
Because the reasoning is: if he didn't kill anyone yet, he was going to anyway. Nice to convict people before they do something, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
52. Or kill a lot of paper targets
and clay pigeons with all those shotguns.

Buying in bulk saves money in the long haul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
66. oh, but he MUST be an avid collector!
oh, but he MUST be an avid collector/enthusiast (pay no attention to the nazi flag in the background...)! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. Yep. When You Hear Hoofbeats, Think Horses, Not Zebras
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
72. There is only one reason to make that assumption...
Obsessive in its own right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ammunition is not a threat during a fire unlike what people see in movies. Gasoline and all types of
flammables are the real danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. There is no Constitutional right that can be claimed for ammunition. None.
License, limit, and register every damn bullet out there. Enough already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. LOL, I guess you support "License, limit, and register every damn" instrument for writing including
keyboards, pens, ink, pencils, and all other tools necessary to exercise the freedom of expression and press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #29
54. Excellent PWNage!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
50. Since regulation of ammunition
is not reserved for the Federal Government nor specifically denied to the State Governments, it becomes the perview of the various states to regulate ammunition per the Xth amendment to the Consitution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #50
58. And what happens when one state regulates, taxes, etc. something that people want?
You get three guesses, and the first two don't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
77. Why?
Really, why?

What damage did the bullets do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
95. Mate, the government can't even keep track of nukes
much less bullets! There's just no way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CT_Progressive Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
45. What a crock of shit - of course ammo is a threat in a fire.
My buddy was in Iraq and almost died INSIDE THE BASE because some NUMNUT tossed some ammo into their trash burning pit.

Of COURSE ammo cooks off in a fire - its filled with GUNPOWDER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. It's a very minor threat
Edited on Mon Dec-17-07 06:38 PM by slackmaster
Here's how the Corvallis, OR Fire Department addresses it:

How can I store ammunition so that it doesn't harm emergency personnel in the event of a fire?

Firefighters experience the surprise of exploding ammunition in a fire situation with some regularity. When bullets and shells are exposed to fire, as long as they are not chambered in a weapon, they are generally not lethal. They do explode and you certainly would not want to be in the immediate vicinity. Most often, however, they will simply explode and not project the pellets or slugs with much force.

The safety gear worn by firefighters has been fairly effective in protecting them from injury in this case. Loaded weapons exposed to high heat, however, will "shoot;" and semi-automatic weapons will keep shooting, especially if gas-operated as most repeating shotguns and some rifles are. This is a severe hazard for emergency personnel (or anyone in the vicinity).

There is a documented instance (which occurred elsewhere, by the way) in which a loaded rifle, mounted on a wall rack, kept discharging during a fire, hitting the command vehicle, causing fire personnel to believe that they were being shot at. They withdrew to a safe location and, consequently, the house was destroyed. Fortunately, no one was hurt in that instance. So, this is another good reason for not keeping loaded weapons in the home.

Safe storage of shells and bullets would be best in a fire-resistive gun cabinet. Lacking that, there are metal ammunition boxes; however, they create a risk of a larger, more powerful explosion if the components were to detonate due to the confined energy created by the box itself. A personal safe with a fire rating would be the next best, giving security against unwarranted access as well as fire protection.


Link: http://www.ci.corvallis.or.us/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=1565&Itemid=1904#ammo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Certainly small arms ammo cooks off but bullets do not go flying around. It's just a big firecracker
Edited on Mon Dec-17-07 07:03 PM by jody
Your buddy is pulling your leg about ammo in the trash burning pit unless it was a 20 mm explosive round or grenade or mortar round or artillery round or rocket or mine. That's another issue depending on the particular item but the OP article is about small arms ammunition.

You might want to track down Sporting Ammunition and the Firefighter published by Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute (SAAMI) and reduce your ignorance about the subject of small arms ammunition and fires.

"Item #250 - Nearly one million rounds of ammunition were subjected to ten different tests-from open burn conditions to tightly confined burn conditions-to examine what happens to sporting ammunition exposed to severe impact and fire. This video is recommended as an educational tool for fire departments and explains how firefighters face no danger from sporting ammunition in a fire when protected by standard turn-out gear."

I'm glad I could be of help in stamping out ignorance about small arms ammunition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #45
79. Mythbusters had a segment on this
Well, on what happens to ammo in an oven. Outside of a gun, ammo that cooks off doesn't really propel the bullet anywhere; it just kind of goes "pop". The Mythbusters couldn't even get it to break the glass of the oven.

A loaded weapon in a fire, however, is another story...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #79
100. Wonder how many "pops" with a million rounds?
I'm all for letting people have a guns for their own safety and for hobby purposes, but for crying out loud, there has to be limit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #100
107. The only person who would suffer any harm would be the guy himself
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 06:19 PM by slackmaster
The FD would probably just let the place burn to the ground.

Ammo gone. Gun collection gone. House gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #100
117. Assuming a cook off rate of 80%, about 800,000
None of which would launch a projectile with any noticeable force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #117
119. It would make for some good YouTube videos
The fireworks would probably go on for some time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
57. Define "not a threat."
No, a bullet doesn't have the same explosive and directed force when not fired out of a barrel. That doesn't mean it can't be dangerous, and doesn't still explode. That's why the military builds ammo dumps the way they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #57
73. If you don't know what the phrase "not a threat" means, then you have a real problem. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #73
121. Damn, somebody's excessively touchy today.
I define "not a threat" as meaning "not a threat," which is apparently different from your definition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. I collect weapons of war
Edited on Mon Dec-17-07 06:15 PM by slackmaster
300 is a lot more than I own but it isn't really a large collection. I've been collecting only 10 years or so.

Where is this guy getting all of these weapons of war...

If you have a type 03 Federal Firearms License (as I do) you can get them shipped directly to your home from any of numerous wholesale importer/dealers.

You can have one shipped to your door by the Civilian Marksmanship Program without an FFL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
80. You have an FFL?
If you do, there's another point you might like to make while we're talking here: FFL getting and keeping is a real pain in the ass (at least from everything I've heard). They are difficult to qualify for - not at all like simply walking into a gun shop and picking out a gun. Also, the federal government claims the right to inspect the property where guns are kept at any time - like 3 am, if they feel like it.

I bring this up because I know someone is going to look at your post and start in on how people can get guns by mail-order, and how that's so dangerous, etc. etc. There's very few people that can get an FFL, and it's not the same as some street hood getting a gun under-the-counter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #80
89. Yes, a type 03 (Collector of Curios and Relics)
It's not hard to get, but you do have to submit to the same federal background check as for type 01 (dealer's license), or to buy a registered machine gun. I had the same kind of check done when I got a government security clearance, and when I took a job at a bank.

Also, the federal government claims the right to inspect the property where guns are kept at any time - like 3 am, if they feel like it.

They may be able to do that for dealers, but they have to give collectors some notice. I've never been inspected, nor do I know any other "crufflers" who have.

There's very few people that can get an FFL, and it's not the same as some street hood getting a gun under-the-counter.

Any citizen with a clean criminal record who is over 21 can get a type 03 FFL. You have to notify your local chief law enforcement officer (e.g. chief of the San Diego PD), and you have to keep the same kinds of records of acquisitions and dispositions as dealers do (i.e. a "bound book"). Type 03s are specifically prohibited from engaging in a business of transferring firearms, and the penalty for doing so illegally can be severe.

On the plus side, it does allow you to acquire and dispose of C&R firearms through interstate commerce, and the cost for the license is just $30 for three years. It's one of the best deals the federal government offers.

I think there would be more of us if people were aware of the availability of the license.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #89
125. OK...
Most of what I heard about for FFLs was for dealers. Seems like it is a lot more stringent for that class. However, you did bring up a good point, that I was trying to get to also: you have to have a clean criminal record, and you have to go through some recordkeeping, in order to keep one. So it isn't as easy as simply buying a gun off Ebay with no recordkeeping or background check, like some people try to argue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think the limit should be 250 guns and 900,000 rounds
Anything more than that is just excessive. :sarcasm:

Sweet Jesus, how much would that much ammo have cost? Probably more than his house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Probably not, if he bought it a long time ago
Edited on Mon Dec-17-07 06:03 PM by slackmaster
The Civilian Marksmanship Program is offering .30-'06 rifle ammunition for $200 plus S&H for a case of 768 rounds. When I bought three cases a couple of years ago the price was about $110. In past years it has been much lower.

http://www.odcmp.com/ammo.htm

A machine gun collector I know used to buy 8 mm Mauser for less than 5 cents per round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanctified Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Well if it was a million rounds of .22 ammo
It would not cost that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
39. Yep. And you can buy .22 ammo in 5000 round cases.
Even at today's prices a 5000 round case will only set you back about $700. When I was a kid you could pick up a 5000 round case for about $100 to $150. My bet would be that this old man did just that...he bought a "few" cases back when they were cheaper.

It's also interesting to compare the number of guns he had to the amount of ammo. The way it works out, he bought just under one case of ammo for each of his rifles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. a 550 round brick is 12.00
When I was in Tennessee last week, I got a box of 550 for 9.99 at Wal-mart. Only place in town to buy ammo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
82. Maybe he reloaded
In which case he could have put that ammo together at a few pennies per round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. Guns don't kill people...
Edited on Mon Dec-17-07 06:01 PM by BushDespiser12
Idiots behind the trigger kill people

Eliminate the ability to put idiots behind the trigger (much tougher gun laws) and eliminate more killings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Owning firearms and misusing them are very different things
What difference does it make whether an individual owns one or many?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. You don't think this guy distributes?
It does beg the question why so much, does it not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. No, I very much doubt that he does
Edited on Mon Dec-17-07 06:55 PM by slackmaster
With a collection like that, he probably has a Federal Firearms License like mine. Getting caught running an illegal business could land a licensed collector in prison.

Most of his collection consists of old bolt-action rifles, which are unsuitable for most criminal purposes.

Read the article linked to in the OP. It quotes neighbors as saying the man lived like a hermit, and the interior of his house is described as a mess.

It sounds like a lonely old guy, perhaps with a touch of Alzheimer's disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
69. Then... bullets don't kill people?
Then... bullets don't kill people? Bullets don't don't turn muscle and tissue into hamburger meat? The shooter does it? Does he stick his finger in the other guy to cause a hole and then uses a knife to cause damage to the muscle and surrounding tissue?

Damn those Emergency Rooms for calling a wound caused by gunshot a "GSW" or gun-shot wound. They should refer to them for what they really are... "Wounds Caused By Idiots Behind Triggers". Damned liberal doctors and nurses.... :sarcasm:

'cause we all know... when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will accidentally shoot their children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. One gun a month
I did that for 4 years. Some months I bought more. I sold some. 300 guns isn't a big collection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. You should have posted the bit about the Nazi flag
that police found as well.

Might give a little more perspective to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanctified Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. My Grandfather had a Nazi Bayonet and a Hitler youth knife.
Spoils he brought back from WWII, the guy was 71 and more than likely served in WWII so I would be willing to bet it's something he brought back home like my grandfather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Time flies - A 71-year-old is too young to have served in WW II
He would have been no more than nine years old on VJ Day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanctified Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Good Point my bad to assume people that people who are 70 served.
I just remember my Grandfather who served and remember talking to him about it when he was 70 but that 15 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Or not
Edited on Mon Dec-17-07 06:13 PM by slackmaster


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Plenty of people have Nazi memorabilia and aren't Nazis themselves
Figuring he's a Nazi because of some old thing that his dad or his big brother maybe brought back from the war is the wrong conclusion to draw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:24 PM
Original message
And there are new Nazi flags of various kinds
all over the Internet. There just aren't that many Nazis around for all those flags. I imagine that some folks just want them as a backdrop for a WWII display of German weapons or have an interest in 20th Century history. Harmless display purposes in short. I have a big Imperial German naval flag with the iron cross symbol but only because I have an interest in military history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. How long would it take to fire a million rounds?
(one squeeze at a time)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I have shot 600 in a day before
At that rate a million would last about four and a half years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. ah.
Well I suppose that owning a million rounds requires a special kind of crazy, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. My Instant Internet Diagnosis is "Harmless Lovable Old Crackpot"
Maybe with a touch of OCD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. Lovable = 1,000,000 bullets?
Don't expect a Valentine's Day card from me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Think of it as a million rounds of ammo that aren't out on the street
:hi:

BTW I doubt that he really had a million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
91. I contacted a friend who still lives in Angola for some details
According to the friend's report, Mr. Weldon had been employed as a pressman at a local printing company for many years -- the same company, in fact, that my late husband worked for before we left Angola. Whether my husband knew him or not I now have no way of knowing, and it's been over 20 years since we left there anyway.

Again according to the friend, Mr. Weldon's wife left him back in the 60s or so and married another employee of the same company (then later a third), and he seemed to withdraw after the divorce. Never spoke to anyone, kept to himself.

Mr. Weldon's son was employed at one time by a mutual friend of ours, and even as an adult, the son was kept to a strict and early curfew and was occasionally locked out of the house if he did not return home on time. The son's employer "and me tried to get him out of his shell but he was too far gone."

Probably not a "harmless lovable old crackpot."


Tansy Gold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
92. loving guy pointing a shotgun at an unarmed man.... what kinda gun nut are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #92
93. Where did I say he was a "loving guy"?
Have you had your eyes checked lately, dionysus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #93
122. i typed fast, so you said loveable.
what difference does it make? what you said was still stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #122
123. Yes, I often type "ing" instead of "able"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
81. *shrug* I take MSM reporting on guns and ammo with a grain of salt
I have no idea if there actually were "a million" rounds in the house; I generally don't trust MSM stories involving guns because they don't seem to bother to learn the first thing about them.

If he had a million rounds, an active range shooter could go through those in a couple of years (if he had 330 guns, that's roughly 3000 per gun, maybe 8 trips to a shooting range per gun).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
124. Every 31 Seconds 24/7
So figure you'd at least have to multiply by 3 (8 hours per day), and then add in reloading time, (unless the gun had a REALLY BIG megazine), it would be nearly impossible to fire that off in less than 18 months. And, that would be really, really dedicated to it.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
27. If I got caught with more than an ounce of weed...
I'd get busted with intent to sell.

Isn't there - or shouldn't there be a similar law about guns? I mean, there's personal use, then there's this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. Please present sources supporting the natural, inherent, inalienable/unalienable right to smoke weed
I support legalization of marijuana but I've never seen a legal argument that its an inalienable/unalienable right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
68. Pursuit of happiness?
If alcohol is legal, there is no reason to ban the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. There is no limit
I know of a man in Texas who owns more than 9,000 Luger pistols. Good collectable ones are worth over $1,000 each.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. The argument that you're just a "collector" is a weak one
when it comes to weed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. I prefer to call myself an "enthusiast".
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. A friend of mine collected more than 700 kinds of marijuana
Including US Government-issued stuff.

He kept it in little plastic boxes, all labelled, catalogued, and indexed.

The stuff dried out and went bad years ago, and he had to quit smoking it because of a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
101. Very good point
Interesting how the 2nd amendment extremists don't think the same Constitutional arguments apply to recreational drugs.

"Damn dirty pot smokin' hippies! Lock em up and throw away the key!"

How do they feel about pot smoking hippies with guns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #101
114. You sure about that?
Most 2nd amendment "extremists" I know are quick to point out how fruitless the War on Drugs has been and what a bad idea prohibition in general is. Come to think of it, it's kind of a stock response to gun-control arguments, "seeing how badly prohibition has failed for pot and cocaine, I don't see any need to apply it to guns". Etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #101
118. Add me to the list of 2A people who think drugs should be legalized
:hi:

Some stereotypes have a kernel of truth, some don't add up to squat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
34. I watched the video - his collection is mostly bolt-action rifles
Mausers and such. Curios and relics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
56. Gun nuts like these are the best advertisment
for the gun control advocacy groups. 1 million rounds and 300 guns??? Jeez, who should have a "right" to that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Any American citizen who isn't a felon...or nuts.
next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #59
103. We'll he's nuts
and obviously not responsible enough to be trusted with a bunker full of arms and ammo. Rule of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #103
110. If a judge agrees with you and declares him incompetent, the guns will have to go
Rule of law indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. I think you should have the right to own as many guns and rounds of ammo as you want
I expect the same consideration from you in return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
63. "assault weapons"
And once again, the term gets looser and looser.

Now it means "any gun that scares me".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
65. fear mongering anti-gun folks will love this guy nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
67. I lived in Angola, IN, for 15 years. My sister-in-law's ex was/is
a gun dealer there. He's a piece of slime, so I have no idea if he's still in business or not. There were those who believed that when his "sporting goods" store was robbed several years ago, it was an inside job planned for the insurance money. No one knows where those guns are now.

It is a staunchly, sometimes rabidly Republican area. When I took a psych 101 course at the local Tri-State College (now University) in the mid-70s, the instructor had worked on research that showed the four-county area -- Steuben (Angola is the county seat), DeKalb, LaGrange, Noble -- had one of the highest concentrations of commitably mentally ill persons in the country. Families tended to keep such family members at home rather than hospitalize or institutionalize them. The reason was not compassion or because they felt the ill persons would receive better care at home, since often they received no care at all, even to the point of being neglected or abused. Rather, it was because of the social stigma attached to having a "crazy" person in the family. Since "crazy" people were in "asylums," if the person was at home they weren't considered "crazy" and the family suffered no stigma.

I was personally acquainted with two families in which this was the case, and in both instances the ill person's untreated illness posed a serious safety threat to the rest of the family and the community at large.

Tansy Gold, who left Angola 22 years ago and would not willingly go back for more than a day to visit dear friends, but I'd much rather they come to Arizona to visit me!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #67
105. Boo Radley with an arsenal
:scared:

Perhaps one of the mentally ill raised at home who ended up inheriting the family home.

I can understand why you don't want to move back there. No sympathy for people so backward they refuse to get care for mentally ill family members.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
71. What is with people and their gun obsessions?
Thats the only word to describe it. An Obsession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
74. Who cares how much ammo he has...
He can still only fire one bullet at a time....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
78. Where did you see "assault weapons" in the video?
I must have missed them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #78
85. Same here - I saw mostly old bolt-action rifles
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
87. "almost a hundred handguns, 200 long guns, a million rounds of ammunition and a Nazi flag."
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 04:49 PM by Javaman
and can someone please explain to me why anyone would need this many guns and a nazi flag?

this guy sounds a little angry, yes?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. Pursuit of happiness
Same reason a philatelist "needs" a bunch of old postage stamps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #87
106. No, its a mental health problem
as is the case when anyone collects such items to an extreme, in this case, where it puts his life and safety at risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #106
109. Other than the possible hazard of a fire that would destroy his home and belongings
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 06:24 PM by slackmaster
What "life and safety" risk are you referring to?

BTW - In case you are not aware of it, one of the provisions of the Gun Control Act of 1968 is that a person who has been declared mentally incompetent by a court, or committed involuntarily to a psychiatric institution, can't have guns. I don't know how the law is applied in Indiana, but it's likely that a judge who found him incompetent would order that his collection be sold off by his administrator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #109
113. I think you just answered your own question
Its a shame someone was nearly killed before it was discovered what a danger this guy was to himself and to others.

One would think someone would have noticed his problems before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #113
116. I think it's a stretch to say "someone was nearly killed"
The guy brandished a weapon in order to intimidate people. That's bad and wrong and stupid for sure, but it doesn't rise to the level of someone being nearly killed IMO.

One would think someone would have noticed his problems before.

That's one of the problems of our society: Older people isolated from friends, neighbors, and family. Parents neglected by their own children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
94. It strikes me as a new height in idiocy that people here are defending this nut
sigh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #94
96. Let me make something clear - The guy is an asshole for brandishing a shotgun
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 05:53 PM by slackmaster
It may even be a crime. If he's convicted of a felony, he will lose his gun collection as well as his freedom and his right to vote. But that's the only thing the information provided suggests that he did wrong.

The knee-jerk responses here branding him as mentally ill, a neo-Nazi, even a racist are over the top. He might be any or all of those things, but we don't have enough information to pass that kind of judgement. Bigotry cuts many ways, and liberals and "progressives" aren't immune to the disease.

We have one reply by someone who knows people who know him, and report that he's basically been a hermit for about 40 years, and maybe a general dickhead. That's all we really know about the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #96
115. I'm envisioning an old and somewhat eccentric guy who was pissed about his tree being cut down...
I could believe my 90 year old mom having a similar reaction if somebody was chopping on one of her 150 year old red oaks. She doesn't have a shotgun though...just a .38 revolver. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #94
120. What I, at least, am defending...
...is the notion that someone can have a collection of guns, even a large collection of guns, and that not be dispositive proof that he or she is a "nut".

Brandishing a shotgun at the construction worker, presumably, was criminal. It would have been criminal for him to do it with one gun in his house. The fact that he collected guns was not a problem (and he can say goodbye to that collection if he gets convicted); the problem was that he misused one of them.

What troubles me (and I assume the other people sticking up for the guy) is that the fact that he owns 300 guns has been brought up in this thread as unquestionable proof that he's mentally unstable, which I don't think is remotely fair, and perpetuates the gun-ownership-as-mental-illness delusion our party seems to suffer from too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
97. I live about 30 miles from Angola
and it is a weird, weird place sometimes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #97
99. Less weird now that I'm outta there, but. . . .
definitely still weird.

See my post 67 above for part of the reason why it's weird.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #99
102. I am leaving this FK'd up place
as soon as I can. I stay by myself and don't discuss religion or politics with very many people. I know that is cowardly to some , but I am 67 yr old and live alone.


My neighbor ( a woman in her 40s) said she didn't know the difference between a Republican and a Democrat until I explained it to her !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
104. If they found a single 'Nazi flag' he's almost certainly not a WN
WN usually have a *ton* of WN literature and memorabilia (a lot of it not even Nazi related). I mean stuff like the Turner Diaries, music from the old Resistance Records, 14 words / 88 decals and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #104
108. WN? Do you mean White Nationalist?
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 06:35 PM by slackmaster
I'm not familiar with that TLA.

And if so yes, I agree that a real 88er would have a whole lot more than one flag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #108
112. Yes. What most people in the "Movement" call themselves.
(Many categorically state that they are *not* White supremacists, as the media calls them, btw)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC