|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:01 PM Original message |
Poll question: If you're not guaranteed a win, you shouldn't even try. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. It depends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Please explain? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Because things are complex |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Well as I said I'm most concerned about healthcare right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:48 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Maybe 6 million people saw Sicko |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Thanks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:11 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:13 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. But that's where we need more visibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
2. Depends on the stakes and the circumstances {nt} |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Since we have two examples in current events... sCHIP and Medicare for All |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
5. Give me ambiguity or give me something else. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 06:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
54. It can be applied to lots of situations in real life. The answer is always the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
7. The Way Things Have Been Going:--- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. The media is going to do that no matter what. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zorahopkins
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
8. Bully Pulpit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Indeed! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. The term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. It does not only mean that office. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. That's what Teddy Roosevelt referred to when he coined it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Yes I know that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
12. It's a calculation you work the odds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Exactly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
17. Don't even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmokingJacket
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
21. Big difference between Not Guaranteed, and Guaranteed Not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. I don't understand why the fight to lose sCHIP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
necso
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
24. Your referenced examples |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Thanks for your thoughtful response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
necso
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. And I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
28. Disagree. However, if you're guaranteed a loss, you shouldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:03 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. So they shouldn't have tried with sCHIP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. First, S-CHIP wasn't a guaranteed loss. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. It was a guaranteed failure. Bush vowed to veto it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. The failure to override wasn't guaranteed, especially given public sentiment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:19 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Failure to override was guaranteed... look at the way pukes behave. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. This is a catastrophic viewpoint. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Launch media circuses for political gain? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Potayto, potahto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:31 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. However you characterize it, it is what is done in every legislature. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:40 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. The fact that it is frequently done does not mean that we should consciously push |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:45 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Characterizing a discussion about single-payer care as "pandering"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:54 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. No, that isn't pandering. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 06:00 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. It's not "Dems" vs. "Republicans" and I don't know why you're trying to turn it into that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 06:03 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. No, that isn't pandering. It's sloganeering. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 06:04 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Who do you expect it should be, then? Or will be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 06:11 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. This is where we come in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 06:18 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. I used to agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike03
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
35. Absolutely, Try |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloudbase
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
37. You gotta show up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
38. Even the fox tried before stalking off muttering "sour grapes!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. As is so often the case... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:37 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. So since no Senator is sponsoring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 05:42 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. I just assume that's hyperbole. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC